Literature DB >> 21238953

Plasticity of human spatial cognition: spatial language and cognition covary across cultures.

Daniel B M Haun1, Christian J Rapold, Gabriele Janzen, Stephen C Levinson.   

Abstract

The present paper explores cross-cultural variation in spatial cognition by comparing spatial reconstruction tasks by Dutch and Namibian elementary school children. These two communities differ in the way they predominantly express spatial relations in language. Four experiments investigate cognitive strategy preferences across different levels of task-complexity and instruction. Data show a correlation between dominant linguistic spatial frames of reference and performance patterns in non-linguistic spatial memory tasks. This correlation is shown to be stable across an increase of complexity in the spatial array. When instructed to use their respective non-habitual cognitive strategy, participants were not easily able to switch between strategies and their attempts to do so impaired their performance. These results indicate a difference not only in preference but also in competence and suggest that spatial language and non-linguistic preferences and competences in spatial cognition are systematically aligned across human populations.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21238953     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.12.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  18 in total

Review 1.  Cross-cultural research on spatial concept development.

Authors:  Pierre R Dasen
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2018-09

2.  Language unifies relational coding: The roles of label acquisition and accessibility in making flexible relational judgments.

Authors:  Nicole M Scott; Maria D Sera
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 3.059

3.  Language supports young children's use of spatial relations to remember locations.

Authors:  Hilary E Miller; Rebecca Patterson; Vanessa R Simmering
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-02-18

4.  Sun, age and test location affect spatial orientation in human foragers in rainforests.

Authors:  Haneul Jang; Christophe Boesch; Roger Mundry; Vidrich Kandza; Karline R L Janmaat
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Unraveling the contribution of left-right language on spatial perspective taking.

Authors:  Linda Abarbanell; Peggy Li
Journal:  Spat Cogn Comput       Date:  2020-10-05

Review 6.  Structuring Knowledge with Cognitive Maps and Cognitive Graphs.

Authors:  Michael Peer; Iva K Brunec; Nora S Newcombe; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 7.  Using natural travel paths to infer and compare primate cognition in the wild.

Authors:  Karline R L Janmaat; Miguel de Guinea; Julien Collet; Richard W Byrne; Benjamin Robira; Emiel van Loon; Haneul Jang; Dora Biro; Gabriel Ramos-Fernández; Cody Ross; Andrea Presotto; Matthias Allritz; Shauhin Alavi; Sarie Van Belle
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-04-15

8.  Moving Forward in Space and Time: How Strong is the Conceptual Link between Spatial and Temporal Frames of Reference?

Authors:  Andrea Bender; Annelie Rothe-Wulf; Lisa Hüther; Sieghard Beller
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-15

9.  The Thaayorre think of Time Like They Talk of Space.

Authors:  Alice Gaby
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-08-28

10.  Cultural background shapes spatial reference frame proclivity.

Authors:  Caspar Goeke; Suchada Kornpetpanee; Moritz Köster; Andrés B Fernández-Revelles; Klaus Gramann; Peter König
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.