Literature DB >> 21236817

Interpreting phenotypic variation in plants.

J S Coleman1, K D McConnaughay, D D Ackerly.   

Abstract

Plant ecologists and evolutionary biologists frequently examine patterns of phenotypic variation across variable environments or genetic identities. Too often, we ignore the fact that most phenotypic traits change throughout growth and development of individual plants, and that rates of growth and development are highly variable. Plants growing in different environments are likely to grow at different rates, and will be of different sizes and stages of development at a particular age. When we compare plants as a function of plant size or developmental stage, as well as a function of age, we broaden our understanding of phenotypic variation between plants.
Copyright © 1994. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Year:  1994        PMID: 21236817     DOI: 10.1016/0169-5347(94)90087-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  52 in total

1.  Multi-trait interactions, not phylogeny, fine-tune leaf size reduction with increasing altitude.

Authors:  Rubén Milla; Peter B Reich
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-01-03       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Key plant structural and allocation traits depend on relative age in the perennial herb Pimpinella saxifraga.

Authors:  Ulo Niinemets
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2005-06-19       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Interactive effects of nutrient and mechanical stresses on plant morphology.

Authors:  Sara Puijalon; Jean-Paul Lena; Gudrun Bornette
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  A general model for allometric covariation in botanical form and function.

Authors:  Charles A Price; Brian J Enquist; Van M Savage
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-07-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A standardized method for analysis of Medicago truncatula phenotypic development.

Authors:  Bruna Bucciarelli; Jim Hanan; Debra Palmquist; Carroll P Vance
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Frequent fires prime plant developmental responses to burning.

Authors:  Kimberley J Simpson; Jill K Olofsson; Brad S Ripley; Colin P Osborne
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Tradeoff between height and relative growth rate in a dominant grass from the Serengeti ecosystem.

Authors:  G Hartvigsen; S J McNaughton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Elevated CO2 alters anatomy, physiology, growth, and reproduction of red mangrove (Rhizophora mangle L.).

Authors:  E J Farnsworth; A M Ellison; W K Gong
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Sensitivity of growth and biomass allocation patterns to increasing nitrogen: a comparison between ephemerals and annuals in the Gurbantunggut Desert, north-western China.

Authors:  Xiaobing Zhou; Yuanming Zhang; Karl J Niklas
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  Biomass and nitrogen distribution ratios reveal a reduced root investment in temperate lianas vs. self-supporting plants.

Authors:  Tomasz P Wyka; Marcin Zadworny; Joanna Mucha; Roma Żytkowiak; Kinga Nowak; Jacek Oleksyn
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 4.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.