Rubén Milla1, Peter B Reich. 1. Área de Biodiversidad y Conservación, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, c/Tulipán s/n, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain. ruben.milla@gmail.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Despite long-held interest, knowledge on why leaf size varies widely among species is still incomplete. This study was conducted to assess whether abiotic factors, phylogenetic histories and multi-trait interactions act together to shape leaf size. METHODS: Fifty-seven pairs of altitudinal vicariant species were selected in northern Spain, and leaf area and a number of functionally related leaf, shoot and whole plant traits were measured for each pair. Structural equation modelling helped unravel trait interactions affecting leaf size, and Mantel tests weighed the relative relevance of phylogeny, environment and trait interactions to explain leaf size reduction with altitude. KEY RESULTS: Leaves of highland vicariants were generally smaller than those of lowlands. However, the extent of leaf size reduction with increasing altitude was widely variable among genera: from approx. 700 cm(2) reduction (96 % in Polystichum) to approx. 30 cm(2) increase (37 % in Sorbus). This was partially explained by shifts in leaf, shoot and whole plant traits (35-64 % of explained variance, depending on models), with size/number trade-offs more influential than shifts in leaf form and leaf economics. Shifts in traits were more important than phylogenetic distances or site-specific environmental variation in explaining the degree of leaf size reduction with altitude. CONCLUSIONS: Ecological filters, constraints due to phylogenetic history (albeit modest in the study system), and phenotypic integration contribute jointly to shape single-trait evolution. Here, it was found that phenotypic change was far more important than shared ancestry to explain leaf size differences of closely related species segregated along altitudes.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Despite long-held interest, knowledge on why leaf size varies widely among species is still incomplete. This study was conducted to assess whether abiotic factors, phylogenetic histories and multi-trait interactions act together to shape leaf size. METHODS: Fifty-seven pairs of altitudinal vicariant species were selected in northern Spain, and leaf area and a number of functionally related leaf, shoot and whole plant traits were measured for each pair. Structural equation modelling helped unravel trait interactions affecting leaf size, and Mantel tests weighed the relative relevance of phylogeny, environment and trait interactions to explain leaf size reduction with altitude. KEY RESULTS: Leaves of highland vicariants were generally smaller than those of lowlands. However, the extent of leaf size reduction with increasing altitude was widely variable among genera: from approx. 700 cm(2) reduction (96 % in Polystichum) to approx. 30 cm(2) increase (37 % in Sorbus). This was partially explained by shifts in leaf, shoot and whole plant traits (35-64 % of explained variance, depending on models), with size/number trade-offs more influential than shifts in leaf form and leaf economics. Shifts in traits were more important than phylogenetic distances or site-specific environmental variation in explaining the degree of leaf size reduction with altitude. CONCLUSIONS: Ecological filters, constraints due to phylogenetic history (albeit modest in the study system), and phenotypic integration contribute jointly to shape single-trait evolution. Here, it was found that phenotypic change was far more important than shared ancestry to explain leaf size differences of closely related species segregated along altitudes.
Authors: Ian J Wright; Peter B Reich; Mark Westoby; David D Ackerly; Zdravko Baruch; Frans Bongers; Jeannine Cavender-Bares; Terry Chapin; Johannes H C Cornelissen; Matthias Diemer; Jaume Flexas; Eric Garnier; Philip K Groom; Javier Gulias; Kouki Hikosaka; Byron B Lamont; Tali Lee; William Lee; Christopher Lusk; Jeremy J Midgley; Marie-Laure Navas; Ulo Niinemets; Jacek Oleksyn; Noriyuki Osada; Hendrik Poorter; Pieter Poot; Lynda Prior; Vladimir I Pyankov; Catherine Roumet; Sean C Thomas; Mark G Tjoelker; Erik J Veneklaas; Rafael Villar Journal: Nature Date: 2004-04-22 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Scott L Wing; Guy J Harrington; Francesca A Smith; Jonathan I Bloch; Douglas M Boyer; Katherine H Freeman Journal: Science Date: 2005-11-11 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Karl J Niklas; Edward D Cobb; Ulo Niinemets; Peter B Reich; Arne Sellin; Bill Shipley; Ian J Wright Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-05-14 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Sandra Díaz; Jens Kattge; Johannes H C Cornelissen; Ian J Wright; Sandra Lavorel; Stéphane Dray; Björn Reu; Michael Kleyer; Christian Wirth; I Colin Prentice; Eric Garnier; Gerhard Bönisch; Mark Westoby; Hendrik Poorter; Peter B Reich; Angela T Moles; John Dickie; Andrew N Gillison; Amy E Zanne; Jérôme Chave; S Joseph Wright; Serge N Sheremet'ev; Hervé Jactel; Christopher Baraloto; Bruno Cerabolini; Simon Pierce; Bill Shipley; Donald Kirkup; Fernando Casanoves; Julia S Joswig; Angela Günther; Valeria Falczuk; Nadja Rüger; Miguel D Mahecha; Lucas D Gorné Journal: Nature Date: 2015-12-23 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Evan Weiher; Deborah Freund; Tyler Bunton; Artur Stefanski; Tali Lee; Stephen Bentivenga Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2011-08-27 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: Lucas D Gorné; Sandra Díaz; Vanessa Minden; Yusuke Onoda; Koen Kramer; Christopher Muir; Sean T Michaletz; Sandra Lavorel; Joanne Sharpe; Steven Jansen; Martijn Slot; Eduardo Chacon; Gerhard Boenisch Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2022-05-12 Impact factor: 5.040
Authors: Gijsbert D A Werner; William K Cornwell; Johannes H C Cornelissen; E Toby Kiers Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-06-03 Impact factor: 11.205