Literature DB >> 21236532

Should extramedullary fixations for hip fractures be removed after bone union?

Sebastian Eberle1, Christof Wutte, Christoph Bauer, Geert von Oldenburg, Peter Augat.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Osteosynthesis implants, which remain in the patient after fracture union to save additional surgery, may affect the strain distribution within the bone. A reduction of strain within the bone is known to result in localized bone loss ("stress shielding") and increased fracture risk. The purpose of this study was to examine whether extramedullary fixations for femoral neck fractures have to be removed after fracture union to prevent reductions in cortex strains.
METHODS: In a biomechanical experiment, six pairs of human cadaver femora (mean age 56 years, range 48 to 64) were supplied with five strain gauges per bone. The bones were equally supplied with a compression hip screw or a femoral neck plate. Before surgery, after surgery and after removal of the implants, axial compression tests were conducted to measure surface strains during loading.
FINDINGS: The compression hip screw reduced the amount of strain at the superior neck by 88% (P=0.015) and at the lesser trochanter by 51% (P=0.038). The femoral neck plate reduced the amount of strain at the superior neck by 89% (P=0.001), and increased the amount of strain at the inferior neck by 58% (P=0.02) and at the lesser trochanter by 63% (P=0.005). After implant removal, there was no significant difference in strain compared to pre-fracture levels, except for the compression hip screw with 21% less strain (P=0.047) at the superior neck.
INTERPRETATION: Removal of osteosynthesis implants after bone union reverts bone strains to pre-fracture levels, and might prevent further bone loss induced by stress shielding.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21236532     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  4 in total

1.  The Analysis of Biomechanical Properties of Proximal Femur after Implant Removal.

Authors:  Jae Hyuk Yang; Tae Gon Jung; Arjun Rupanagudi Honnurappa; Jae Min Cha; Chang Hwa Ham; Tae Yoon Kim; Seung Woo Suh
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 1.781

2.  Biomechanical Test after Hip Cannulated Screw Removal (in vitro Analysis).

Authors:  Anderson Freitas; Lucas S Ramos; Érgon Lab Dantas; Vincenzo Giordano Neto; Patrick F Godinho; Antônio C Shimano
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-08-20

3.  Energy Required for Fracture in Synthetic Proximal Femoral Models After Synthesis Material Removal: a Biomechanical Study Using Cannulated Screws, Dynamic Hip Screws, and Proximal Femoral Nails.

Authors:  Anderson Freitas; Landwehrle de Lucena da Silva; Renilton Rodrigues Costa; Lucas Sacramento Ramos; Marcos Norberto Giordano; Henrique Mansur Gonçalves
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2021-03-31

4.  Static bending test after proximal femoral nail (PFN) removal - in vitro analysis.

Authors:  Leonardo Morais Paiva; Sílvio Leite de Macedo Neto; Diogo Ranier de Macedo Souto; George Neri Barros Ferreira; Hélio Ismael da Costa; Anderson Freitas
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2017-08-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.