Literature DB >> 21233977

Episiotomy in low-risk deliveries: physician factors.

B Arroll, A Giles, S B Sheps.   

Abstract

From 376 randomly selected nulliparous women who delivered at the Grace Hospital in 1986, we selected 133 low-risk women and performed a retrospective chart review to ascertain the episiotomy rate for physicians by sex, years since graduation, and specialty status. There was a statistically significant difference between the rate for specialists (65%) and general practitioners (38%). A non-significant difference was found between male physicians (41%) and female physicians (56%) and between physicians who had graduated within 15 years (42%) and those who graduated more than 15 years ago (52%). Subgroup analysis of the general practitioner data revealed different patterns for male and female physicians according to their graduation cohort.

Entities:  

Year:  1990        PMID: 21233977      PMCID: PMC2280488     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  9 in total

1.  Episiotomy in low risk patients.

Authors:  B Arroll
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Routine episiotomy: a possible answer.

Authors:  B Arroll
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Differences in intrapartum obstetric care provided to women at low risk by family physicians and obstetricians.

Authors:  A J Reid; J C Carroll; J Ruderman; M A Murray
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Routine prophylactic episiotomy. Is it always necessary.

Authors:  L S Formato
Journal:  J Nurse Midwifery       Date:  1985 May-Jun

5.  Changes in the management of labour: 1. Length and management of the second stage.

Authors:  J L Reynolds; P L Yudkin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1987-05-15       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Injury to innervation of pelvic floor sphincter musculature in childbirth.

Authors:  S J Snooks; M Setchell; M Swash; M M Henry
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-09-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Benefits and risks of episiotomy: an interpretative review of the English language literature, 1860-1980.

Authors:  S B Thacker; H D Banta
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 2.347

8.  Is routine episiotomy necessary?

Authors:  R F Harrison; M Brennan; P M North; J V Reed; E A Wickham
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-06-30

9.  West Berkshire perineal management trial.

Authors:  J Sleep; A Grant; J Garcia; D Elbourne; J Spencer; I Chalmers
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-09-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.