Literature DB >> 21233502

Hemodynamic perturbations during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in 45° Trendelenburg position.

Melinda Lestar1, Lars Gunnarsson, Lars Lagerstrand, Peter Wiklund, Suzanne Odeberg-Wernerman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy has gained widespread use. However, circulatory effects in patients subjected to an extreme Trendelenburg position (45°) are not well characterized.
METHODS: We studied 16 patients (ASA physical status I-II) with a mean age of 59 years scheduled for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (45° head-down tilt, with an intraabdominal pressure of 11-12 mm Hg). Hemodynamics, echocardiography, gas exchange, and ventilation-perfusion distribution were investigated before and during pneumoperitoneum, in the Trendelenburg position and, in 8 of the patients, also after the conclusion of surgery.
RESULTS: In the 45° Trendelenburg position, central venous pressure increased almost 3-fold compared with the initial value, with an associated 2-fold increase in mean pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (P<0.01). Mean arterial blood pressure increased by 35%. Heart rate, stroke volume, cardiac output, and mixed venous oxygen saturation were unaffected during surgery, as were echocardiographic heart dimensions. After induction of anesthesia, isovolumic relaxation time was prolonged, with no further change during the study. Deceleration time was normal and stable. In the horizontal position after pneumoperitoneum exsufflation, filling pressures and mean arterial blood pressure returned to baseline levels. Pneumoperitoneum reduced lung compliance by 40% (P<0.01). Addition of the Trendelenburg position caused a further decrease (P<0.05). Arterial blood acid-base balance was normal. End-tidal carbon dioxide tension increased whereas arterial carbon dioxide was unaffected with unchanged ventilation settings. Pneumoperitoneum increased PaO2 (P<0.05). Ventilation-perfusion distribution, shunt, and dead space were unaltered during the study.
CONCLUSIONS: Pneumoperitoneum and 45° Trendelenburg position caused 2- to 3-fold increases in filling pressures, without effects on cardiac performance. Filling pressures were normalized immediately after surgery. Lung compliance was halved. Gas exchange was unaffected. No perioperative cardiovascular complications occurred.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21233502     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182075d1f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  30 in total

1.  [Sacropolpopexy - pro robotic].

Authors:  C Hampel; C Thomas; J W Thüroff; F Roos
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Anesthetic considerations for robotic surgery.

Authors:  Jeong Rim Lee
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2014-01-28

3.  Does steep Trendelenburg positioning effect the ocular hemodynamics and intraocular pressure in patients undergoing robotic cystectomy and robotic prostatectomy?

Authors:  Muhammet Fuat Ozcan; Ziya Akbulut; Canan Gurdal; Sinan Tan; Yelda Yildiz; Serdar Bayraktar; Ayse Nur Ozcan; Kemal Ener; Serkan Altinova; Muhammed Ersagun Arslan; Mevlana Derya Balbay
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Prolonged steep Trendelenburg position: risk of postoperative upper airway obstruction.

Authors:  Vimi Rewari; Rashmi Ramachandran
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2013-05-08

Review 5.  Anesthetic considerations in robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Alan D Kaye; Nalini Vadivelu; Nitin Ahuja; Sukanya Mitra; Dan Silasi; Richard D Urman
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2013

6.  Low Tidal Volume Positive End-Expiratory Pressure versus High Tidal Volume Zero-Positive End-Expiratory Pressure and Postoperative Pulmonary Functions in Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Murat Haliloglu; Beliz Bilgili; Mehtap Ozdemir; Tumay Umuroglu; Nurten Bakan
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 1.927

7.  Positive end-expiratory pressure-induced increase in external jugular venous pressure does not predict fluid responsiveness in laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Min Hur; Seokha Yoo; Jung-Yoon Choi; Sun-Kyung Park; Dhong Eun Jung; Won Ho Kim; Jin-Tae Kim; Jae-Hyon Bahk
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 2.078

8.  Less is more: clinical impact of decreasing pneumoperitoneum pressures during robotic surgery.

Authors:  Christine E Foley; Erika Ryan; Jian Qun Huang
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-06-22

9.  Corneal abrasion in hysterectomy and prostatectomy: role of laparoscopic and robotic assistance.

Authors:  Ajay Sampat; Isaac Parakati; Rangesh Kunnavakkam; David B Glick; Nita K Lee; Meaghan Tenney; Scott Eggener; Steven Roth
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 10.  Anesthetic Challenges in Robotic-assisted Urologic Surgery.

Authors:  Richard L Hsu; Alan D Kaye; Richard D Urman
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2013
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.