Literature DB >> 21233186

Variations in clinical PET/CT operations: results of an international survey of active PET/CT users.

Thomas Beyer1, Johannes Czernin, Lutz S Freudenberg.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This study gathered information about clinical PET/CT operations worldwide to help guide discussions on the use and standardization of clinical PET/CT.
METHODS: A Web-based survey of PET/CT users was initiated in November 2009 through e-mail advertising using Academy of Molecular Imaging databases. Recipients were asked 58 questions related to demographics (e.g., location, number of PET/CT systems, and staffing), PET/CT operations and use, and variations in (18)F-FDG oncology imaging protocols.
RESULTS: The responders were from centers in the Americas (71%), Europe (22%), Asia-Pacific (6%), and Middle East (1%), with most responding sites representing public health care institutions (60%). PET/CT systems were most frequently installed in nuclear medicine departments (59%). Of the sites operating a PET/CT system, 16% had 10 y or more of stand-alone PET experience. About 40% of all sites operated at least 2 PET/CT systems. PET/CT was most frequently used for applications in torso or whole-body oncology (87%), radiation therapy planning (4%), cardiology (4%), and neurology (5%). The average interval of fasting before an (18)F-FDG PET/CT examination was 7 ± 3 h (range, 4-12 h). Blood glucose levels were measured at 99% of sites, but acceptable maximal glucose levels varied substantially (an upper limit of 200 mg/dL was applied at >50% of the institutions). A weight-based radioactivity dose injection was performed at 44% of sites. The mean (18)F-FDG activity injected was 390 MBq (range, 110-585 MBq) for 3-dimensional PET of a 75-kg patient. The mean uptake time was 64 ± 14 min (range, 20-90 min). Split protocols involving patient repositioning and adapted imaging parameters were used at 51% of sites. Only 41% used patient positioning aids. Intravenous or oral CT contrast material was used at 52% of sites in up to 25% of patients. Most sites (90%) measured maximum standardized uptake value as an index of tissue glucose use. Only 62% of sites provided a fully integrated PET/CT report.
CONCLUSION: An international survey among clinical PET/CT users revealed significant variations in standard (18)F-FDG PET/CT protocols. This finding illustrates the need for continuous training and ongoing standardization in an effort to optimize PET/CT in oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21233186     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.110.079624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  46 in total

1.  Nuclear medicine 2013: from status quo to status go.

Authors:  Thomas Beyer; Marcus Hacker; August Schubiger; Irene Virgolini; Hans-Jürgen Wester
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Comparison of CT, PET, and PET/CT for staging of patients with indolent non-hodgkin's lymphoma: statistical errors in Fueger et al. (2009).

Authors:  Larry R White
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Minimizing the radiation dose of CT attenuation correction while improving image quality: The case for innovation.

Authors:  James A Case
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Effect of blood glucose level on standardized uptake value (SUV) in 18F- FDG PET-scan: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 20,807 individual SUV measurements.

Authors:  Mahsa Eskian; Abass Alavi; MirHojjat Khorasanizadeh; Benjamin L Viglianti; Hans Jacobsson; Tara D Barwick; Alipasha Meysamie; Sun K Yi; Shingo Iwano; Bohdan Bybel; Federico Caobelli; Filippo Lococo; Joaquim Gea; Antonio Sancho-Muñoz; Jukka Schildt; Ebru Tatcı; Constantin Lapa; Georgia Keramida; Michael Peters; Raef R Boktor; Joemon John; Alexander G Pitman; Tomasz Mazurek; Nima Rezaei
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Optimisation and harmonisation: two sides of the same coin?

Authors:  Ronald Boellaard
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Patient's weight: a neglected cause of variability in SUV measurements? A survey from an EARL accredited PET centre in 513 patients.

Authors:  Charline Lasnon; Benjamin Houdu; Emmanuel Kammerer; Thibault Salomon; Jeremy Devreese; Adrien Lebasnier; Nicolas Aide
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Life is not black and white, nor just Shades of Gray.

Authors:  T Beyer; R J Hicks; L S Freudenberg
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  CT protocol optimisation in PET/CT: what we learn from a systematic review.

Authors:  V Bertolini; V Trojani; M Bertolini
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Comparison of PET metabolic indices for the early assessment of tumour response in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated by polychemotherapy.

Authors:  Jacques-Antoine Maisonobe; Camilo A Garcia; Hatem Necib; Bruno Vanderlinden; Alain Hendlisz; Patrick Flamen; Irène Buvat
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Variance of SUVs for FDG-PET/CT is greater in clinical practice than under ideal study settings.

Authors:  Virendra Kumar; Kavindra Nath; Claudia G Berman; Jongphil Kim; Tawee Tanvetyanon; Alberto A Chiappori; Robert A Gatenby; Robert J Gillies; Edward A Eikman
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 7.794

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.