Literature DB >> 23674210

Optimisation and harmonisation: two sides of the same coin?

Ronald Boellaard.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2013        PMID： 23674210     DOI： 10.1007/s00259-013-2440-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN： 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


× No keyword cloud information.
  24 in total

1.  Clinical use of PET-CT data for radiotherapy planning: what are we looking for?

Authors:  Arturo Chiti; Margarita Kirienko; Vincent Grégoire
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  PET in radiotherapy planning: particularly exquisite test or pending and experimental tool?

Authors:  Vincent Gregoire; Arturo Chiti
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Chaperoning drug development with PET.

Authors:  Wolfgang A Weber
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 4.  Improvements in cancer staging with PET/CT: literature-based evidence as of September 2006.

Authors:  Johannes Czernin; Martin Allen-Auerbach; Heinrich R Schelbert
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 5.  Standards for PET image acquisition and quantitative data analysis.

Authors:  Ronald Boellaard
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group.

Authors:  H Young; R Baum; U Cremerius; K Herholz; O Hoekstra; A A Lammertsma; J Pruim; P Price
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 7.  Predictive and prognostic value of FDG-PET in nonsmall-cell lung cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Henricus F M van der Heijden; Frans H M Corstens; Wim J G Oyen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors.

Authors:  Richard L Wahl; Heather Jacene; Yvette Kasamon; Martin A Lodge
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study.

Authors:  Ronald Boellaard; Nanda C Krak; Otto S Hoekstra; Adriaan A Lammertsma
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Harmonizing SUVs in multicentre trials when using different generation PET systems: prospective validation in non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Charline Lasnon; Cédric Desmonts; Elske Quak; Radj Gervais; Pascal Do; Catherine Dubos-Arvis; Nicolas Aide
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 9.236
View more
  2 in total

1.  Staging the axilla in breast cancer patients with ¹⁸F-FDG PET: how small are the metastases that we can detect with new generation clinical PET systems?

Authors:  Dimitri Bellevre; Cécile Blanc Fournier; Odile Switsers; Audrey Emmanuelle Dugué; Christelle Levy; Djelila Allouache; Cédric Desmonts; Hubert Crouet; Jean-Marc Guilloit; Jean-Michel Grellard; Nicolas Aide
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Towards enhanced PET quantification in clinical oncology.

Authors:  Habib Zaidi; Nicolas Karakatsanis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.039
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.