OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of an electronic learning (e-learning) programme on the performance of nurses in the recognition of child abuse in a simulated case in the Emergency Department (ED). DESIGN: Blinded, randomised controlled trial using pre- and postintervention design. SETTING: The ED of a University Medical Center in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 38 ED nurses were included, 25 nurses were analysed. INTERVENTION: Half of the participants followed a 2-hour e-learning programme focused on the recognition of child abuse, the others acted as a control group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Individual performance during a case-simulated parent interview to detect child abuse and self-reported self-efficacy for the detection of child abuse. Performance on the simulation was scored by an expert panel using a standardised assessment form which was designed to score quantity and quality of the questions posed by the nurse (minimum score 0; maximum score 114). RESULTS: During post-test, nurses in the intervention group performed significantly better during the simulation than the control group, (89 vs 71, 95% CI 2.9 to 33.3), and reported higher self-efficacy (502 vs 447, 95% CI -25.4 to 134.7). Performance in detecting child abuse correlated positively with the self-efficacy score (Spearman correlation 0.387, p value 0.056). Comparing post- and pretest results separately for the intervention and the control group showed a significant increase in performance in the intervention group. CONCLUSION: E-learning improved the performance in case simulations and the self-efficacy of the nurses in the ED in the detection of child abuse. Wider implementation of the e-learning programme to improve the first step in the detection of child abuse is recommended.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of an electronic learning (e-learning) programme on the performance of nurses in the recognition of child abuse in a simulated case in the Emergency Department (ED). DESIGN: Blinded, randomised controlled trial using pre- and postintervention design. SETTING: The ED of a University Medical Center in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 38 ED nurses were included, 25 nurses were analysed. INTERVENTION: Half of the participants followed a 2-hour e-learning programme focused on the recognition of child abuse, the others acted as a control group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Individual performance during a case-simulated parent interview to detect child abuse and self-reported self-efficacy for the detection of child abuse. Performance on the simulation was scored by an expert panel using a standardised assessment form which was designed to score quantity and quality of the questions posed by the nurse (minimum score 0; maximum score 114). RESULTS: During post-test, nurses in the intervention group performed significantly better during the simulation than the control group, (89 vs 71, 95% CI 2.9 to 33.3), and reported higher self-efficacy (502 vs 447, 95% CI -25.4 to 134.7). Performance in detecting child abuse correlated positively with the self-efficacy score (Spearman correlation 0.387, p value 0.056). Comparing post- and pretest results separately for the intervention and the control group showed a significant increase in performance in the intervention group. CONCLUSION: E-learning improved the performance in case simulations and the self-efficacy of the nurses in the ED in the detection of child abuse. Wider implementation of the e-learning programme to improve the first step in the detection of child abuse is recommended.
Authors: René Aloisio da Costa Vieira; Ana Helena Lopes; Almir José Sarri; Zuleica Caulada Benedetti; Cleyton Zanardo de Oliveira Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Kerryann Walsh; Elizabeth Eggins; Lorelei Hine; Ben Mathews; Maureen C Kenny; Sarah Howard; Natasha Ayling; Elizabeth Dallaston; Elizabeth Pink; Dimitrios Vagenas Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2022-07-05
Authors: Sean Wharton; David Macklin; Marie-Philippe Morin; Jessica Blavignac; Stuart Menzies; Laura Garofalo; Michelle A Francisco; Carol Thomas; Maxime Barakat Journal: BMC Prim Care Date: 2022-05-02
Authors: Judith S Sittig; Cuno S P M Uiterwaal; Karel G M Moons; Edward E S Nieuwenhuis; Elise M van de Putte Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2011-10-18 Impact factor: 2.125
Authors: Remco H A Ebben; Pierre M van Grunsven; Marie Louise Moors; Peter Aldenhoven; Jordan de Vaan; Roger van Hout; Theo van Achterberg; Lilian C M Vloet Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2015-04-16 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Maartje C M Schouten; Henk F van Stel; Theo J M Verheij; Michiel L Houben; Ingrid M B Russel; Edward E S Nieuwenhuis; Elise M van de Putte Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Eveline C F M Louwers; Ida J Korfage; Marjo J Affourtit; Harry J De Koning; Henriëtte A Moll Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2012-10-23 Impact factor: 2.125
Authors: Veerajalandhar Allareddy; Rahimullah Asad; Min Kyeong Lee; Romesh P Nalliah; Sankeerth Rampa; David G Speicher; Alexandre T Rotta; Veerasathpurush Allareddy Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-06-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Maartje C M Schouten; Henk F van Stel; Theo J M Verheij; Edward E S Nieuwenhuis; Elise M van de Putte Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2016-11-08 Impact factor: 2.497