Literature DB >> 21232002

Individual patient data meta-analysis of enoxaparin vs. unfractionated heparin for venous thromboembolism prevention in medical patients.

S Laporte1, J Liotier, L Bertoletti, F-X Kleber, G F Pineo, C Chapelle, N Moulin, P Mismetti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) are both recommended for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients.
OBJECTIVE: To perform an individual patient data meta-analysis to evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of the LMWH enoxaparin and UFH in preventing VTE in hospitalized medical patients.
METHODS: Randomized clinical trials comparing subcutaneous enoxaparin (4000 IU once-daily) and UFH (5000 IU subcutaneous two- or three-times daily) for VTE prevention were identified by a systematic search. Individual patient data were obtained from each eligible trial.
RESULTS: Overall, four trials were eligible, including 3600 patients randomized to receive enoxaparin (n = 1799) or UFH (n = 1801). Median patient age was 71 years, and 49.3% were female. Compared with UFH, enoxaparin was associated with risk reductions of 37% for total VTE [relative risk (RR) 0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51-0.77] and 62% for symptomatic VTE (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.17-0.85) at day 15. RR for total VTE in stroke and non-stroke patients was 0.59 (95% CI 0.47-0.74) and 0.87 (95% CI 0.51-1.50), respectively. Major bleeding rates were consistently low and similar between treatment groups at day 15 (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.53-2.44). There was a trend towards reduced risk for mortality in patients receiving enoxaparin (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.64-1.08), compared with UFH.
CONCLUSIONS: Enoxaparin significantly reduces VTE in hospitalized medical patients, compared with UFH, without increasing the risk for major bleeding, and was associated with a trend towards reduced all-cause mortality.
© 2011 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21232002     DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04182.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 1538-7836            Impact factor:   5.824


  10 in total

1.  Clinical use of low-dose parenteral anticoagulation, incidence of major bleeding and mortality: a multi-centre cohort study using the French national health data system.

Authors:  Jacques Bouget; Frédéric Balusson; Sandrine Kerbrat; Pierre-Marie Roy; Damien Viglino; Karine Lacut; Laure Pavageau; Emmanuel Oger
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  International consensus on the prevention of venous and arterial thrombotic events in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Pablo A Olivera; Stephane Zuily; Paulo G Kotze; Veronique Regnault; Sameer Al Awadhi; Peter Bossuyt; Richard B Gearry; Subrata Ghosh; Taku Kobayashi; Patrick Lacolley; Edouard Louis; Fernando Magro; Siew C Ng; Alfredo Papa; Tim Raine; Fabio V Teixeira; David T Rubin; Silvio Danese; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 46.802

3.  Risk factors for inpatient venous thromboembolism despite thromboprophylaxis.

Authors:  Tzu-Fei Wang; Catherine A Wong; Paul E Milligan; Mark S Thoelke; Keith F Woeltje; Brian F Gage
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.944

Review 4.  Anticoagulation for the long-term treatment of venous thromboembolism in people with cancer.

Authors:  Lara A Kahale; Maram B Hakoum; Ibrahim G Tsolakian; Charbel F Matar; Irene Terrenato; Francesca Sperati; Maddalena Barba; Victor Ed Yosuico; Holger Schünemann; Elie A Akl
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-06-19

5.  Using knowledge translation for quality improvement: an interprofessional education intervention to improve thromboprophylaxis among medical inpatients.

Authors:  Melissa K Myers; Claire L Jansson-Knodell; Darrell R Schroeder; John G O'Meara; Sara L Bonnes; John T Ratelle
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2018-09-18

6.  Enoxaparin is associated with lower rates of mortality than unfractionated Heparin in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Colin Pawlowski; A J Venkatakrishnan; Christian Kirkup; Gabriela Berner; Arjun Puranik; John C O'Horo; Andrew D Badley; Venky Soundararajan
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-03-09

7.  Critically ill patients with edema and ascites may experience subtherapeutic anti-factor Xa levels following abdominal subcutaneous enoxaparin treatment.

Authors:  Vichapat Tharanon; Theerasuk Kawamatawong
Journal:  SAGE Open Med Case Rep       Date:  2022-08-19

8.  Thromboprophylaxis strategies to improve the prognosis of COVID-19.

Authors:  Laurent Bertoletti; Behnood Bikdeli; Stéphane Zuily; Marc Blondon; Patrick Mismetti
Journal:  Vascul Pharmacol       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 5.773

9.  Real-World Comparative Effectiveness and Cost Comparison of Thromboprophylactic Use of Enoxaparin versus Unfractionated Heparin in 376,858 Medically Ill Hospitalized US Patients.

Authors:  S Phani Veeranki; Zhimin Xiao; Andrée Levorsen; Meenal Sinha; Bimal R Shah
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 3.571

Review 10.  Systematic review of methods for individual patient data meta- analysis with binary outcomes.

Authors:  Doneal Thomas; Sanyath Radji; Andrea Benedetti
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 4.615

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.