Literature DB >> 21231982

Incorrect performance of the breath hold method in the old underestimates cerebrovascular reactivity and goes unnoticed without concomitant blood pressure and end-tidal CO(2) registration.

Arenda H E A van Beek1, Helena M de Wit, Marcel G M Olde Rikkert, Jurgen A H R Claassen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The breath hold maneuver is a convenient and frequently used method to assess cerebrovascular reactivity (CR). This study aimed to assess feasibility and reproducibility of this method in healthy older persons.
METHODS: Twenty-five healthy volunteers, aged 75 (SD 4) years, performed 2 consecutive breath holds after careful instruction. Blood pressure (BP-Finapres), cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV-Transcranial Doppler), and end-tidal CO(2) (capnography) were measured continuously. As reference standard, CR was determined by hyperventilation and CO(2) -inhalation. These measurements were repeated after 3 months in 11 randomly selected subjects.
RESULTS: Despite apparent compliance with instructions during performance of breath holding, only 29 of the 50 breath holds (58%) had been accurately executed, which was identified only from BP and end-tidal CO(2) measurements. Incorrect breath holds led to underestimation of CR. For valid breath holds, reproducibility was comparable to the reference method (coefficient of variation 19.4% and 17.6%, respectively).
CONCLUSION: The number of inaccurate breath holds was unacceptably high, moreover, these could not be identified from CBFV registrations alone. Therefore, reports of CR based on breath holds in older subjects without coregistration of BP and either end-tidal CO(2) or chest-expansion should no longer be acceptable.
© 2010 by the American Society of Neuroimaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21231982     DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2010.00517.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neuroimaging        ISSN: 1051-2284            Impact factor:   2.486


  5 in total

1.  Effects of thoracic pressure changes on MRI signals in the brain.

Authors:  Paula Wu; Peter A Bandettini; Ronald M Harper; Daniel A Handwerker
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 6.200

2.  Compact, multi-exposure speckle contrast optical spectroscopy (SCOS) device for measuring deep tissue blood flow.

Authors:  Tanja Dragojević; Joseph L Hollmann; Davide Tamborini; Davide Portaluppi; Mauro Buttafava; Joseph P Culver; Federica Villa; Turgut Durduran
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Reproducibility of cerebrovascular reactivity measurements: A systematic review of neuroimaging techniques.

Authors:  Moss Y Zhao; Amanda Woodward; Audrey P Fan; Kevin T Chen; Yannan Yu; David Y Chen; Michael E Moseley; Greg Zaharchuk
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 6.960

4.  Fine tuning breath-hold-based cerebrovascular reactivity analysis models.

Authors:  Christiaan Hendrik Bas van Niftrik; Marco Piccirelli; Oliver Bozinov; Athina Pangalu; Antonios Valavanis; Luca Regli; Jorn Fierstra
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 2.708

5.  Confounding of Cerebral Blood Flow Velocity by Blood Pressure During Breath Holding or Hyperventilation in Transient Ischemic Attack or Stroke.

Authors:  Alastair J S Webb; Matteo Paolucci; Sara Mazzucco; Linxin Li; Peter M Rothwell
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 7.914

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.