Literature DB >> 21229475

[The population-based mammography screening programme in Germany: uptake and first experiences of women in 10 federal states].

U S Albert1, M Kalder, H Schulte, M Klusendick, J Diener, B Schulz-Zehden, I Kopp, I Nass-Griegoleit.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Within the statutory health insurance (SHI) cancer early detection programme (KFU) an organised, population-based, quality-assured mammographic screening programme in Germany was initiated for women aged 50-69 years in 2004. The aim of the study was to evaluate uptake and first experiences of participants with this new screening approach and to evaluate the background of knowledge, attitudes and intention to address a needs-assessed communication strategy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A representative, explorative survey within the female population was conducted in 10 federal states. A telephone survey of randomly selected 68,188 contacts was performed, 9,004 women gave informed consent to evaluate rates of invitation and uptake followed by a mailed questionnaire. Of these, 3,469 were returned and 3,226 were analysed.
RESULTS: The invitation rate of the programme was 56.6%, the uptake of mammographic screening was 66%, and the screening coverage rate was 37.3%. 90% of the participants were insured by SHI, women with lower socio-economic strata were attracted in accordance with the data of the general population. 61% of all women did not know that the risk of breast cancer increases with age and 56% believed that screening prevents breast cancer. 62.1% judged their own risk to be low. A physician's recommendation to participate was significantly associated with attendance (p<0.05). 90% of the participants would follow the next invitation.
CONCLUSION: The KFU targeted group of women was reached and the organised mammography screening programme was well perceived by invited women. For developing a lasting communication strategy information deficits have to be considered along with beliefs and attitudes of elegible women. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21229475     DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1268441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gesundheitswesen        ISSN: 0941-3790


  7 in total

1.  The Mode of Detection Is Not Associated with Quality of Life in Women with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Bettina Braun; Marc-André Kurosinski; Laura Khil; Joke Tio; Barbara Krause-Bergmann; Hans-Werner Hense
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Valid comparisons and decisions based on clinical registers and population based cohort studies: assessing the accuracy, completeness and epidemiological relevance of a breast cancer query database.

Authors:  Christian Olaf Jacke; Mathias Kalder; Uwe Wagner; Ute-Susann Albert
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2012-12-27

3.  Participation in breast cancer screening among women of Turkish origin in Germany - a register-based study.

Authors:  Eva-Maria Berens; Lisa Stahl; Yüce Yilmaz-Aslan; Odile Sauzet; Jacob Spallek; Oliver Razum
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 2.809

4.  Can facts trump unconditional trust? Evidence-based information halves the influence of physicians' non-evidence-based cancer screening recommendations.

Authors:  Odette Wegwarth; Gert G Wagner; Gerd Gigerenzer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Mammography Screening 2.0 - How Can Risk-Adapted Screening be Implemented in Clinical Practice?: Results of a Focus Group Discussion with Experts in the RISIKOLOTSE.DE Project.

Authors:  Nicole Fürst; Marion Kiechle; Brigitte Strahwald; Anne S Quante
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 6.  mHealth Interventions to Improve Cancer Screening and Early Detection: Scoping Review of Reviews.

Authors:  Désirée Schliemann; Min Min Tan; Wilfred Mok Kok Hoe; Devi Mohan; Nur Aishah Taib; Michael Donnelly; Tin Tin Su
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 7.076

7.  Determinants of mammography screening participation-a cross-sectional analysis of the German population-based Gutenberg Health Study (GHS).

Authors:  Roman M Pokora; Matthias Büttner; Andreas Schulz; Alexander K Schuster; Hiltrud Merzenich; Andrea Teifke; Matthias Michal; Karl Lackner; Thomas Münzel; Sylke Ruth Zeissig; Philipp S Wild; Susanne Singer; Daniel Wollschläger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 3.752

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.