Literature DB >> 21228744

Postoperative complications in prosthesis-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix.

Allen S Liu1, Huang-Kai Kao, Richard G Reish, Charles A Hergrueter, James W May, Lifei Guo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acellular dermal matrix has become a common adjunct in prosthesis-based breast reconstruction. The authors' aim was to determine whether acellular dermal matrix use in immediate prosthesis-based breast reconstruction is associated with higher rate of complications.
METHODS: Over a 5½-year period at the Brigham and Women's Hospital, 470 postmastectomy defects were reconstructed immediately using tissue expanders or implants. These were divided into two groups: reconstructions with or without acellular dermal matrix. Data were collected on patient comorbidities, radiation, intraoperative tumescent solution use, prosthesis size, initial fill volume, and complications.
RESULTS: The risk for major infections that required prosthesis removal was elevated in the acellular dermal matrix group (4.9 versus 2.5 percent), but this increase did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.172). There was a statistically significant increase in overall wound infection rate in the acellular dermal matrix group (6.8 versus 2.5 percent, p = 0.031), but in a multivariate analysis, the use of acellular dermal matrix did not materialize as a significant risk factor for overall wound infection. Overall surgical complication rate was significantly higher in the acellular dermal matrix group at 19.5 percent, compared with the non-acellular dermal matrix group at 12.3 percent (p < 0.001). Other significant risk factors for overall surgical complication included smoking, higher body mass index, higher initial volume, and larger implant size.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient selection for prosthesis reconstruction involving acellular dermal matrix should be judicious, especially among smokers and patients with elevated body mass index. Even though the use of acellular dermal matrix allows higher initial volumes and reduced number of expansions, one should be careful about putting in too high of an initial volume.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21228744     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31820cf233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  38 in total

1.  Acellular dermal matrices: Use in reconstructive and aesthetic breast surgery.

Authors:  Sheina A Macadam; Peter A Lennox
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2012

2.  Surveillance and Prevention of Surgical Site Infections in Breast Oncologic Surgery with Immediate Reconstruction.

Authors:  Margaret A Olsen; Katelin B Nickel; Ida K Fox
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Infect Dis       Date:  2017-05-11

3.  Use of latissimus dorsi muscle onlay patch alternative to acellular dermal matrix in implant-based breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Jeeyeon Lee; Youngtae Bae
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-06

4.  Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Multicenter Assessment of Risks and Benefits.

Authors:  Michael Sorkin; Ji Qi; Hyungjin M Kim; Jennifer B Hamill; Jeffrey H Kozlow; Andrea L Pusic; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Revascularization of AlloDerm Used during Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery.

Authors:  Zahrah M Taufique; Nupur Bhatt; David Zagzag; Richard A Lebowitz; Seth M Lieberman
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2018-07-06

Review 6.  Surgical perspectives regarding application of biomaterials for the management of large congenital diaphragmatic hernia defects.

Authors:  Amulya K Saxena
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 7.  Strategies and considerations in selecting between subpectoral and prepectoral breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Ara A Salibian; Jordan D Frey; Nolan S Karp
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-02

Review 8.  Evidence for the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Paula R Gravina; Rowland W Pettit; Matthew J Davis; Sebastian J Winocour; Jesse C Selber
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.314

9.  Remodeling Characteristics and Collagen Distributions of Biologic Scaffold Materials Biopsied From Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction Sites.

Authors:  Jaime A Cavallo; Noopur Gangopadhyay; Jason Dudas; Andres A Roma; Mateusz S Jasielec; Jack Baty; Sara Baalman; Margaret M Frisella; Marissa M Tenenbaum; Terence M Myckatyn; Brent D Matthews; Corey R Deeken
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.539

10.  Human Acellular Dermis versus Submuscular Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Multivariate Analysis of Short-Term Complications.

Authors:  Armando A Davila; Akhil K Seth; Edward Wang; Philip Hanwright; Karl Bilimoria; Neil Fine; John Ys Kim
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2013-01-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.