Literature DB >> 21228656

Baseline neuropsychological testing in managing sport-related concussion: does it modify risk?

Christopher Randolph1.   

Abstract

Baseline neuropsychological testing is mandated at various levels of play for hundreds of thousands of athletes each year. This paper reviews the risks associated with sport-related concussion, and the clinical validity and reliability data for the most commonly used baseline test, the ImPACT program. There is no evidence to suggest that the use of baseline testing alters any risk from sport-related concussion, nor is there even a good rationale as to how such tests might influence outcome. Given the poor sensitivity and low reliability of these measures, they have an associated high false negative rate (i.e., classifying a player's neurocognitive status is normal, when in fact, it is not). The use of baseline neuropsychological testing, therefore, is not likely to diminish risk, and to the extent that there is a risk associated with "premature" return-to-play, the use of these measures even may increase that risk in some cases.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21228656     DOI: 10.1249/JSR.0b013e318207831d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Sports Med Rep        ISSN: 1537-890X            Impact factor:   1.733


  16 in total

Review 1.  Concussions and their consequences: current diagnosis, management and prevention.

Authors:  Charles H Tator
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Computerized neurocognitive testing in the management of sport-related concussion: an update.

Authors:  Jacob E Resch; Michael A McCrea; C Munro Cullum
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 7.444

3.  Prevalence of invalid computerized baseline neurocognitive test results in high school and collegiate athletes.

Authors:  Philip Schatz; Rosemarie Scolaro Moser; Gary S Solomon; Summer D Ott; Robin Karpf
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 4.  Assessment, management and knowledge of sport-related concussion: systematic review.

Authors:  Doug King; Matt Brughelli; Patria Hume; Conor Gissane
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 5.  Concussions in high school sports: are they worth the risk? Should school football be banned?

Authors:  Bran L Mahaffey
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec

Review 6.  Sports-related concussion testing.

Authors:  Mark S Dziemianowicz; Matthew P Kirschen; Bryan A Pukenas; Eric Laudano; Laura J Balcer; Steven L Galetta
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.081

7.  Comparing post-concussive neurocognitive test data to normative data presents risks for under-classifying "above average" athletes.

Authors:  Philip Schatz; Stacey Robertshaw
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 2.813

8.  National Athletic Trainers' Association position statement: management of sport concussion.

Authors:  Steven P Broglio; Robert C Cantu; Gerard A Gioia; Kevin M Guskiewicz; Jeffrey Kutcher; Michael Palm; Tamara C Valovich McLeod
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 9.  Neuropsychological Assessment Following Concussion: an Evidence-Based Review of the Role of Neuropsychological Assessment Pre- and Post-Concussion.

Authors:  Anthony P Kontos; Alicia Sufrinko; Melissa Womble; Nathan Kegel
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2016-06

10.  Quantifying the Value of Multidimensional Assessment Models for Acute Concussion: An Analysis of Data from the NCAA-DoD Care Consortium.

Authors:  Gian-Gabriel P Garcia; Steven P Broglio; Mariel S Lavieri; Michael McCrea; Thomas McAllister
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.