Literature DB >> 21228133

Subjective well-being and national satisfaction: findings from a worldwide survey.

Mike Morrison1, Louis Tay, Ed Diener.   

Abstract

We examined the relationship between satisfaction with one's country (national satisfaction) and subjective well-being utilizing data from a representative worldwide poll. National satisfaction was a strong positive predictor of individual-level life satisfaction, and this relationship was moderated by household income, household conveniences, residential mobility, country gross domestic product per capita, and region (Western vs. non-Western country). When individuals are impoverished or more bound to their culture and surroundings, national satisfaction more strongly predicts life satisfaction. In contrast, reverse trends were found in analyses predicting life satisfaction from satisfaction in other domains (health, standard of living, and job). These patterns suggest that people are more likely to use proximate factors to judge life satisfaction where conditions are salutary, or individualism is salient, but are more likely to use perceived societal success to judge life satisfaction where life conditions are difficult, or collectivism predominates. Our findings invite new research directions and can inform quality-of-life therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21228133     DOI: 10.1177/0956797610396224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  14 in total

1.  Are burns a chronic condition? Examining patient reported outcomes up to 20 years after burn injury-A Burn Model System National Database investigation.

Authors:  Cailin A Abouzeid; Audrey E Wolfe; Pengsheng Ni; Gretchen J Carrougher; Nicole S Gibran; Flora M Hammond; Radha Holavanahalli; Kara A McMullen; Kimberly Roaten; Oscar Suman; Barclay T Stewart; Steven Wolf; Ross Zafonte; Lewis E Kazis; Colleen M Ryan; Jeffrey C Schneider
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 3.697

2.  Sacred spaces, healing places: therapeutic landscapes of spiritual significance.

Authors:  Geraldine Perriam
Journal:  J Med Humanit       Date:  2015-03

3.  Revisiting the Link between Job Satisfaction and Life Satisfaction: The Role of Basic Psychological Needs.

Authors:  Wenceslao Unanue; Marcos E Gómez; Diego Cortez; Juan C Oyanedel; Andrés Mendiburo-Seguel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-09

4.  Basque Ethnic Identity and Collective Empowerment: Two Key Factors in Well-Being and Community Participation.

Authors:  Jon Zabala; Susana Conejero; Aitziber Pascual; Itziar Alonso-Arbiol; Alberto Amutio; Barbara Torres-Gomez; Sonia Padoan De Luca; Saioa Telletxea
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-11-23

5.  Trust Buffers Against Reduced Life Satisfaction When Faced With Financial Crisis.

Authors:  Jocelyne Clench-Aas; Ingrid Bergande; Ragnhild Bang Nes; Arne Holte
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-24

6.  Positive psychology interventions in the United Arab Emirates: boosting wellbeing - and changing culture?

Authors:  Louise Lambert; Meg A Warren; Allison Schwam; Michael T Warren
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2021-07-16

7.  A Bifactor Model of Subjective Well-Being at Personal, Community, and Country Levels: A Case With Three Latin-American Countries.

Authors:  Javier Torres-Vallejos; Joel Juarros-Basterretxea; Juan Carlos Oyanedel; Masatoshi Sato
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-03

8.  The Multidimensional Structure of Subjective Well-Being In Later Life.

Authors:  Bram Vanhoutte
Journal:  J Popul Ageing       Date:  2014-01-29

9.  The Satisfaction with Life Scale and the Subjective Well-Being Inventory in the General Korean Population: Psychometric Properties and Normative Data.

Authors:  Young Ho Yun; Ye Eun Rhee; Eunkyo Kang; Jin-Ah Sim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  The Relationship between Just World Beliefs and Life Satisfaction.

Authors:  Warren G Harding; Jasmin Tahmaseb McConatha; V K Kumar
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.