Literature DB >> 21227693

A spot check for assessing static orientation consistency of inertial and magnetic sensing units.

Pietro Picerno1, Andrea Cereatti, Aurelio Cappozzo.   

Abstract

Despite the widespread use of Magnetic and Inertial Measurement Units (MIMUs) for movement reconstruction, only a few studies have tackled issues related to their accuracy. It has been proved that their performance decreases over a period of use since calibration parameters become no longer effective. Good practice rules recommend to assess, prior to any experimental session, the instrumental errors associated to the relevant measures. Aim of this study was to provide a practical and reproducible spot check for assessing the performance of MIMUs in terms of consistency in determining their orientation with respect to a common (inter-MIMUs consistency, IC) and invariant (self-MIMU consistency, SC) global frame. IC was assessed by verifying the hypothesis that the orientation of 9 MIMUs aligned to each other on a rigid Plexiglas plank coincided at any orientation of the plank. SC was assessed separately by verifying differences between measured and imposed known rotations imparted to each MIMU. The orientation of MIMUs relative to the global frame was expressed in terms of quaternion. IC test showed that MIMUs defined their orientation differently. This difference was not constant but varied according to the plank's orientation. The least consistent MIMU showed discrepancy up to 5.7°. SC test confirmed the same MIMU as that affected by the highest inaccuracy (8.4°), whereas it revealed errors within limits (1°) in correspondence to other MIMUs. A tool has been proposed that allows the users to be aware of the errors that may be expected when using MIMUs for the estimate of absolute and relative segments kinematics.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21227693     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  18 in total

Review 1.  Trends Supporting the In-Field Use of Wearable Inertial Sensors for Sport Performance Evaluation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Valentina Camomilla; Elena Bergamini; Silvia Fantozzi; Giuseppe Vannozzi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 2.  The Use of Wearable Sensors for Preventing, Assessing, and Informing Recovery from Sport-Related Musculoskeletal Injuries: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Authors:  Ezio Preatoni; Elena Bergamini; Silvia Fantozzi; Lucie I Giraud; Amaranta S Orejel Bustos; Giuseppe Vannozzi; Valentina Camomilla
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Estimation of 3D Body Center of Mass Acceleration and Instantaneous Velocity from a Wearable Inertial Sensor Network in Transfemoral Amputee Gait: A Case Study.

Authors:  Emeline Simonetti; Elena Bergamini; Giuseppe Vannozzi; Joseph Bascou; Hélène Pillet
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Inertial measures of motion for clinical biomechanics: comparative assessment of accuracy under controlled conditions - changes in accuracy over time.

Authors:  Karina Lebel; Patrick Boissy; Mathieu Hamel; Christian Duval
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A new calibration methodology for thorax and upper limbs motion capture in children using magneto and inertial sensors.

Authors:  Luca Ricci; Domenico Formica; Laura Sparaci; Francesca Romana Lasorsa; Fabrizio Taffoni; Eleonora Tamilia; Eugenio Guglielmelli
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Estimation of step-by-step spatio-temporal parameters of normal and impaired gait using shank-mounted magneto-inertial sensors: application to elderly, hemiparetic, parkinsonian and choreic gait.

Authors:  Diana Trojaniello; Andrea Cereatti; Elisa Pelosin; Laura Avanzino; Anat Mirelman; Jeffrey M Hausdorff; Ugo Della Croce
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 4.262

7.  Inertial measures of motion for clinical biomechanics: comparative assessment of accuracy under controlled conditions - effect of velocity.

Authors:  Karina Lebel; Patrick Boissy; Mathieu Hamel; Christian Duval
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Estimating orientation using magnetic and inertial sensors and different sensor fusion approaches: accuracy assessment in manual and locomotion tasks.

Authors:  Elena Bergamini; Gabriele Ligorio; Aurora Summa; Giuseppe Vannozzi; Aurelio Cappozzo; Angelo Maria Sabatini
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  A Machine Learning Framework for Gait Classification Using Inertial Sensors: Application to Elderly, Post-Stroke and Huntington's Disease Patients.

Authors:  Andrea Mannini; Diana Trojaniello; Andrea Cereatti; Angelo M Sabatini
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  On the Orientation Error of IMU: Investigating Static and Dynamic Accuracy Targeting Human Motion.

Authors:  Luca Ricci; Fabrizio Taffoni; Domenico Formica
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.