Literature DB >> 21226898

Patient specific ankle-foot orthoses using rapid prototyping.

Constantinos Mavroidis1, Richard G Ranky, Mark L Sivak, Benjamin L Patritti, Joseph DiPisa, Alyssa Caddle, Kara Gilhooly, Lauren Govoni, Seth Sivak, Michael Lancia, Robert Drillio, Paolo Bonato.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prefabricated orthotic devices are currently designed to fit a range of patients and therefore they do not provide individualized comfort and function. Custom-fit orthoses are superior to prefabricated orthotic devices from both of the above-mentioned standpoints. However, creating a custom-fit orthosis is a laborious and time-intensive manual process performed by skilled orthotists. Besides, adjustments made to both prefabricated and custom-fit orthoses are carried out in a qualitative manner. So both comfort and function can potentially suffer considerably. A computerized technique for fabricating patient-specific orthotic devices has the potential to provide excellent comfort and allow for changes in the standard design to meet the specific needs of each patient.
METHODS: In this paper, 3D laser scanning is combined with rapid prototyping to create patient-specific orthoses. A novel process was engineered to utilize patient-specific surface data of the patient anatomy as a digital input, manipulate the surface data to an optimal form using Computer Aided Design (CAD) software, and then download the digital output from the CAD software to a rapid prototyping machine for fabrication.
RESULTS: Two AFOs were rapidly prototyped to demonstrate the proposed process. Gait analysis data of a subject wearing the AFOs indicated that the rapid prototyped AFOs performed comparably to the prefabricated polypropylene design.
CONCLUSIONS: The rapidly prototyped orthoses fabricated in this study provided good fit of the subject's anatomy compared to a prefabricated AFO while delivering comparable function (i.e. mechanical effect on the biomechanics of gait). The rapid fabrication capability is of interest because it has potential for decreasing fabrication time and cost especially when a replacement of the orthosis is required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21226898      PMCID: PMC3024934          DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-8-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil        ISSN: 1743-0003            Impact factor:   4.262


  5 in total

Review 1.  A review of rapid prototyping (RP) techniques in the medical and biomedical sector.

Authors:  P A Webb
Journal:  J Med Eng Technol       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug

Review 2.  Stereolithography for craniofacial surgery.

Authors:  Douglas P Sinn; Joseph E Cillo; Brett A Miles
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.046

3.  A preliminary investigation into the development of 3-D printing of prosthetic sockets.

Authors:  Nicholas Herbert; David Simpson; William D Spence; William Ion
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr

4.  Development of tissue scaffolds using selective laser sintering of polyvinyl alcohol/hydroxyapatite biocomposite for craniofacial and joint defects.

Authors:  C K Chua; K F Leong; K H Tan; F E Wiria; C M Cheah
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Manufacture of Passive Dynamic ankle-foot orthoses using selective laser sintering.

Authors:  Mario C Faustini; Richard R Neptune; Richard H Crawford; Steven J Stanhope
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.538

  5 in total
  26 in total

1.  Foot Orthosis and Sensorized House Slipper by 3D Printing.

Authors:  Lorenzo Brognara; Massimiliano Fantini; Kavin Morellato; Gabriela Graziani; Nicola Baldini; Omar Cauli
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 3.748

Review 2.  A Review of Additive Manufacturing Studies for Producing Customized Ankle-Foot Orthoses.

Authors:  Rui Silva; António Veloso; Nuno Alves; Cristiana Fernandes; Pedro Morouço
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-09

3.  Reliability and validity of 3D limb scanning for ankle-foot orthosis fitting.

Authors:  Olivia A Powers; Jeff R Palmer; Jason M Wilken
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 1.672

4.  Accuracy and Repeatability of Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters Measured with an Inertial Measurement Unit.

Authors:  Jorge Posada-Ordax; Julia Cosin-Matamoros; Marta Elena Losa-Iglesias; Ricardo Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo; Laura Esteban-Gonzalo; Carlos Martin-Villa; César Calvo-Lobo; David Rodriguez-Sanz
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Embracing additive manufacture: implications for foot and ankle orthosis design.

Authors:  Scott Telfer; Jari Pallari; Javier Munguia; Kenny Dalgarno; Martin McGeough; Jim Woodburn
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  3D-manufactured patient-specific models of congenital heart defects for communication in clinical practice: feasibility and acceptability.

Authors:  Giovanni Biglino; Claudio Capelli; Jo Wray; Silvia Schievano; Lindsay-Kay Leaver; Sachin Khambadkone; Alessandro Giardini; Graham Derrick; Alexander Jones; Andrew M Taylor
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Application Experience and Patient Feedback Analysis of 3D Printed AFO with Different Materials: A Random Crossover Study.

Authors:  Xianzhong Meng; Min Ren; Yan Zhuang; Yu Qu; Linling Jiang; Zhenjing Li
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Study of mandible reconstruction using a fibula flap with application of additive manufacturing technology.

Authors:  Ming-June Tsai; Ching-Tsai Wu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  Dynamic bowtie filter for cone-beam/multi-slice CT.

Authors:  Fenglin Liu; Qingsong Yang; Wenxiang Cong; Ge Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Normative Data for an Instrumental Assessment of the Upper-Limb Functionality.

Authors:  Marco Caimmi; Eleonora Guanziroli; Matteo Malosio; Nicola Pedrocchi; Federico Vicentini; Lorenzo Molinari Tosatti; Franco Molteni
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-11       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.