Literature DB >> 17003613

Stereolithography for craniofacial surgery.

Douglas P Sinn1, Joseph E Cillo, Brett A Miles.   

Abstract

Advances in computer technology have aided in the diagnostic and clinical management of complex congenital craniofacial deformities. The use of stereolithographic models has begun to replace traditional milled models in the treatment of craniofacial deformities. Research has shown that stereolithography models are highly accurate and provide added information in treatment planning for the correction of craniofacial deformities. These include the added visualization of the complex craniofacial anatomy and preoperative surgical planning with a highly accurate three-dimensional model. While the stereolithographic process has had a beneficial impact on the field of craniofacial surgery, the added cost of the procedure continues to be a hindrance to its widespread acceptance in clinical practice. With improved technology and accessibility the utilization of stereolithography in craniofacial surgery is expected to increase. This review will highlight the development and current usage of stereolithography in craniofacial surgery and provide illustration of it use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17003613     DOI: 10.1097/01.scs.0000230618.95012.1d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  8 in total

1.  Stereolithographic models to guide orbital and oculoplastic surgery.

Authors:  Bijan Beigi; Tristan F W McMullan; Deepak Gupta; Mona Khandwala
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Preliminary development of a workstation for craniomaxillofacial surgical procedures: introducing a computer-assisted planning and execution system.

Authors:  Chad R Gordon; Ryan J Murphy; Devin Coon; Ehsan Basafa; Yoshito Otake; Mohammed Al Rakan; Erin Rada; Srinivas Susarla; Sriniras Susarla; Edward Swanson; Elliot Fishman; Gabriel Santiago; Gerald Brandacher; Peter Liacouras; Gerald Grant; Mehran Armand
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.046

Review 3.  Three-Dimensional Printing: Custom-Made Implants for Craniomaxillofacial Reconstructive Surgery.

Authors:  Mariana Matias; Horácio Zenha; Horácio Costa
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2017-01-03

Review 4.  3D printing in dentistry.

Authors:  A Dawood; B Marti Marti; V Sauret-Jackson; A Darwood
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.626

5.  Patient specific ankle-foot orthoses using rapid prototyping.

Authors:  Constantinos Mavroidis; Richard G Ranky; Mark L Sivak; Benjamin L Patritti; Joseph DiPisa; Alyssa Caddle; Kara Gilhooly; Lauren Govoni; Seth Sivak; Michael Lancia; Robert Drillio; Paolo Bonato
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 4.262

6.  Application of visible light-based projection stereolithography for live cell-scaffold fabrication with designed architecture.

Authors:  Hang Lin; Dongning Zhang; Peter G Alexander; Guang Yang; Jian Tan; Anthony Wai-Ming Cheng; Rocky S Tuan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Exploratory benchtop study evaluating the use of surgical design and simulation in fibula free flap mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  Heather Logan; Johan Wolfaardt; Pierre Boulanger; Bill Hodgetts; Hadi Seikaly
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-06-24

8.  Pilot study: evaluation of the use of the convergent interview technique in understanding the perception of surgical design and simulation.

Authors:  Heather Logan; Johan Wolfaardt; Pierre Boulanger; Bill Hodgetts; Hadi Seikaly
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-06-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.