Literature DB >> 21225001

Percutaneous cecostomy in the management of organic fecal incontinence in children.

Ragab Hani Donkol1, Ahmed Al-Nammi.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess the effectiveness and safety of imaging-guided percutaneous cecostomy in the management of pediatric patients with organic fecal incontinence.
METHODS: Twenty three cecostomies were performed on 21 children with organic fecal incontinence (13 males, 8 females), aged from 5 to 16 years (mean 9.5 years). Thirteen patients had neurogenic fecal incontinence and 8 patients had anorectal anomalies. Procedures were performed under general anesthesia and fluoroscopic guidance. Effectiveness and complication data were obtained for at least 1 year after the procedure.
RESULTS: Cecostomy was successful in 20 patients (primary technical success rate 95%). Cecostomy failed in one patient due to tube breakage (secondary technical success rate 100%). The tubes were in situ for an average of 18 mo (range 12-23 mo). Eighteen patients (87%) expressed satisfaction with the procedures. Resolution of soiling was achieved in all patients with neurogenic fecal incontinence (100%) and in 5 of 8 patients with anorectal anomalies (62.5%). Eleven patients (52%) experienced minor problems. No major complications were noted.
CONCLUSION: Percutaneous cecostomy improves the quality of life in children with organic fecal incontinence. A satisfactory outcome is more prevalent in patients with neurogenic fecal incontinence than anorectal anomalies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cecostomy; Fecal incontinence; Interventional radiology; Pediatric radiology

Year:  2010        PMID: 21225001      PMCID: PMC3018554          DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v2.i12.463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Radiol        ISSN: 1949-8470


  22 in total

1.  The cecostomy button.

Authors:  P G Chait; B Shandling; H F Richards
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.545

2.  Preliminary report: the antegrade continence enema.

Authors:  P S Malone; P G Ransley; E M Kiely
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-11-17       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  The antegrade continence enema procedure why, when and how?

Authors:  P S Malone; J I Curry; A Osborne
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Transcolonoscopic extraperitoneal cecostomy. A new therapeutic and technical proposal.

Authors:  A J Ganc; A J Netto; A C Morrell; H Plapler; J C Ardengh
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 10.093

5.  Management of neurogenic fecal incontinence in myelodysplastic children by a modified continent appendiceal stoma and antegrade colonic enema.

Authors:  M Goepel; H Sperling; M Stöhrer; T Otto; H Rübben
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Percutaneous cecostomy: a new technique in the management of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  B Shandling; P G Chait; H F Richards
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.545

7.  Percutaneous cecostomy: updates in technique and patient care.

Authors:  Peter G Chait; Eran Shlomovitz; Bairbre L Connolly; Michael J Temple; Ricardo Restrepo; Joao G Amaral; Sergio Muraca; Helen F Richards; Sigmund H Ein
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-02-11       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Biofeedback for fecal incontinence: short-term outcomes of 513 consecutive patients and predictors of successful treatment.

Authors:  Christopher M Byrne; Michael J Solomon; Jane M Young; Jenny Rex; Christine L Merlino
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Impact of cecostomy and antegrade colonic enemas on management of fecal incontinence and constipation: ten years of experience in pediatric population.

Authors:  Andrew L Wong; Dragan Kravarusic; Sarah L Wong
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.545

10.  Achieving fecal continence in patients with spina bifida: a descriptive cohort study.

Authors:  S Vande Velde; S Van Biervliet; K Van Renterghem; E Van Laecke; P Hoebeke; M Van Winckel
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Bowel Obstruction: Decompressive Gastrostomies and Cecostomies.

Authors:  Zoe A Miller; Prasoon Mohan; Robert Tartaglione; Govindarajan Narayanan
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  Safety and efficacy of percutaneous cecostomy/colostomy for treatment of large bowel obstruction in adults with cancer.

Authors:  Sanjit O Tewari; George I Getrajdman; Elena N Petre; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Robert H Siegelbaum; Joseph P Erinjeri; Martin R Weiser; Raymond H Thornton
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 3.682

Review 3.  2017 WSES guidelines on colon and rectal cancer emergencies: obstruction and perforation.

Authors:  Michele Pisano; Luigi Zorcolo; Cecilia Merli; Stefania Cimbanassi; Elia Poiasina; Marco Ceresoli; Ferdinando Agresta; Niccolò Allievi; Giovanni Bellanova; Federico Coccolini; Claudio Coy; Paola Fugazzola; Carlos Augusto Martinez; Giulia Montori; Ciro Paolillo; Thiago Josè Penachim; Bruno Pereira; Tarcisio Reis; Angelo Restivo; Joao Rezende-Neto; Massimo Sartelli; Massimo Valentino; Fikri M Abu-Zidan; Itamar Ashkenazi; Miklosh Bala; Osvaldo Chiara; Nicola De' Angelis; Simona Deidda; Belinda De Simone; Salomone Di Saverio; Elena Finotti; Inaba Kenji; Ernest Moore; Steven Wexner; Walter Biffl; Raul Coimbra; Angelo Guttadauro; Ari Leppäniemi; Ron Maier; Stefano Magnone; Alain Chicom Mefire; Andrew Peitzmann; Boris Sakakushev; Michael Sugrue; Pierluigi Viale; Dieter Weber; Jeffry Kashuk; Gustavo P Fraga; Ioran Kluger; Fausto Catena; Luca Ansaloni
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 5.469

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.