Literature DB >> 25529188

Safety and efficacy of percutaneous cecostomy/colostomy for treatment of large bowel obstruction in adults with cancer.

Sanjit O Tewari1, George I Getrajdman1, Elena N Petre2, Constantinos T Sofocleous1, Robert H Siegelbaum1, Joseph P Erinjeri1, Martin R Weiser3, Raymond H Thornton1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of image-guided percutaneous cecostomy/colostomy (PC) in the management of colonic obstruction in patients with cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven consecutive patients underwent image-guided PC to relieve large bowel obstruction at a single institution between 2000 and 2012. Colonic obstruction was the common indication. Patient demographics, diagnosis, procedural details, and outcomes including maximum colonic distension (MCD; ie, greatest transverse measurement of the colon on radiograph or scout computed tomography image) were recorded and retrospectively analyzed.
RESULTS: Following PC, no patient experienced colonic perforation; pain was relieved in 24 of 27 patients (89%). Catheters with tip position in luminal gas rather than mixed stool/gas or stool were associated with greater decrease in MCD (-40%, -12%, and -16%, respectively), with the difference reaching statistical significance (P = .002 and P = .013, respectively). Catheter size was not associated with change in MCD (P = .978). Catheters were successfully removed from six of nine patients (67%) with functional obstructions and two of 18 patients (11%) with mechanical obstructions. One patient underwent endoscopic stent placement after catheter removal. Three patients required diverting colostomy after PC, and their catheters were removed at the time of surgery. One major complication (3.7%; subcutaneous emphysema, pneumomediastinum, and sepsis) occurred 8 days after PC and was successfully treated with cecostomy exchange, soft-tissue drainage, and intravenous antibiotic therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Image-guided PC is safe and effective for management of functional and mechanical bowel obstruction in patients with cancer. For optimal efficacy, catheters should terminate within luminal gas.
Copyright © 2015 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25529188      PMCID: PMC9382847          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2014.09.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.682


  27 in total

1.  Percutaneous cecostomy for management of fecal incontinence in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Sergio Sierre; Jose Lipsich; Horacio Questa; Marcela Bailez; Julieta Solana
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.464

2.  Invasive treatment options for malignant bowel obstruction #119.

Authors:  Robert S Krouse
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 3.  Enteral stents in malignant bowel obstruction.

Authors:  A Aziz Aadam; John A Martin
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2013-01

4.  A temporary self-expanding metallic stent for malignant colorectal obstruction.

Authors:  Xiao-Li Ding; Yong-Dong Li; Rui-Min Yang; Fen-Bao Li; Ming-Qiu Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  CT-guided percutaneous catheter cecostomy.

Authors:  J R Haaga; R J Bick; R M Zollinger
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1987

6.  Percutaneous cecostomy for decompression of the massively distended cecum.

Authors:  G Casola; C Withers; E vanSonnenberg; M J Herba; R M Saba; R A Brown
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Percutaneous cecostomy: updates in technique and patient care.

Authors:  Peter G Chait; Eran Shlomovitz; Bairbre L Connolly; Michael J Temple; Ricardo Restrepo; Joao G Amaral; Sergio Muraca; Helen F Richards; Sigmund H Ein
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-02-11       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Advances and challenges in the management of acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ogilvie syndrome).

Authors:  Arpana Jain; H David Vargas
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2012-03

9.  Cecostomy. Therapeutic indications and results.

Authors:  J C Benacci; B G Wolff
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Efficacy of protective tube cecostomy after restorative resection for colorectal cancer: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Aly Saber; Emad N Hokkam
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 6.071

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction.

Authors:  Thomas Arthur; Adele Burgess
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2022-08-12

2.  Subcutaneous cervical emphysema and pneumomediastinum due to a diastatic rupture of the cecum.

Authors:  R Vecchio; E Intagliata; F Basile; C Spataro; G Giulia; V Leanza; S Marchese
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

Review 3.  Bowel Obstruction: Decompressive Gastrostomies and Cecostomies.

Authors:  Zoe A Miller; Prasoon Mohan; Robert Tartaglione; Govindarajan Narayanan
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  An Alternative Approach to the Terminal Management of Ogilvie Syndrome.

Authors:  Daniel Galban; Joshua J Baiel
Journal:  Case Rep Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-05-22

Review 5.  2017 WSES guidelines on colon and rectal cancer emergencies: obstruction and perforation.

Authors:  Michele Pisano; Luigi Zorcolo; Cecilia Merli; Stefania Cimbanassi; Elia Poiasina; Marco Ceresoli; Ferdinando Agresta; Niccolò Allievi; Giovanni Bellanova; Federico Coccolini; Claudio Coy; Paola Fugazzola; Carlos Augusto Martinez; Giulia Montori; Ciro Paolillo; Thiago Josè Penachim; Bruno Pereira; Tarcisio Reis; Angelo Restivo; Joao Rezende-Neto; Massimo Sartelli; Massimo Valentino; Fikri M Abu-Zidan; Itamar Ashkenazi; Miklosh Bala; Osvaldo Chiara; Nicola De' Angelis; Simona Deidda; Belinda De Simone; Salomone Di Saverio; Elena Finotti; Inaba Kenji; Ernest Moore; Steven Wexner; Walter Biffl; Raul Coimbra; Angelo Guttadauro; Ari Leppäniemi; Ron Maier; Stefano Magnone; Alain Chicom Mefire; Andrew Peitzmann; Boris Sakakushev; Michael Sugrue; Pierluigi Viale; Dieter Weber; Jeffry Kashuk; Gustavo P Fraga; Ioran Kluger; Fausto Catena; Luca Ansaloni
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Complementary Role of Intervention Radiology in Palliative Care in Oncology Setting.

Authors:  Ekta Dhamija; Ashwin Deshmukh; Pankaj Meena; Mukesh Kumar; Sushma Bhatnagar; Sanjay Thulkar
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep

Review 7.  Therapeutic utility of percutaneous cecostomy in adults: an updated systematic review.

Authors:  Yasir Mohammed Khayyat
Journal:  Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2022-02-04

8.  Comparison of blowhole colostomy and loop ostomy for palliation of acute malignant colonic obstruction.

Authors:  Yongjun Park; Dong Uk Choi; Hyung Ook Kim; Yong Bog Kim; Chungki Min; Jung Tack Son; Sung Ryol Lee; Kyung Uk Jung; Hungdai Kim
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2022-03-07

9.  Percutaneous Emergency Needle Caecostomy for Prevention of Caecal Perforation.

Authors:  Alexandra M Limmer; Zackariah Clement
Journal:  Case Rep Surg       Date:  2017-08-15
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.