Literature DB >> 21222290

Apparent diffusion coefficients for evaluation of the response of brain tumors treated by Gamma Knife surgery.

Chuan-Fu Huang1, Shyh-Ying Chiou, Ming-Fang Wu, Hsien-Tang Tu, Wen-Shan Liu, Jim-Chao Chuang.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Cellular density is a major factor for change in the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). The authors hypothesized that loss of tumor cells after Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) may alter the ADC value and used diffusion weighted MR imaging (DW imaging) to evaluate cellular changes in brain tumors to detect their treatment response and the efficacy of GKS.
METHODS: In this paper the authors describe a prospective trial involving 86 patients harboring 38 solid or predominantly solid brain metastases, 30 meningiomas, and 24 acoustic neuromas that were treated by GKS. The patients underwent serial MR imaging examinations, including DW imaging, before treatment and at multiple intervals following GKS. Follow-up MR images and clinical outcomes were reviewed at 3-month intervals for metastatic lesions and at 6-month intervals for benign tumors. Apparent diffusion coefficients were calculated from echo planar DW images, and mean ADC values were compared at each follow-up.
RESULTS: The mean ADC value for all meningiomas was 0.82 ± 0.15 × 10-3 mm2/sec before GKS. The mean ADC value as of the last mean follow-up of 42 months was 1.36 ± 0.19 × 10-3 mm2/sec, a significant increase compared to that before treatment (p < 0.0001). Calcification (p = 0.006) and tumor recurrence (p = 0.025) significantly prevented a rise in the ADC level.The mean ADC value for all solid acoustic neuromas was 1.06 ± 0.17 × 10-3 mm2/sec before GKS. The mean ADC value as of the last mean follow-up of 36 months was 1.72 ± 0.26 × 10-3 mm2/sec, a significant increase (p =0.0002) compared with values before GKS. At the last mean MR imaging follow-up there appeared to be tumor enlargement in 3 patients (12.5%); however, since the ADC values in these patients were significantly higher than the preradiosurgery values, the finding was considered to be a sign of radiation necrosis rather than tumor recurrence. The mean ADC value of metastatic tumors was 1.05 ± 0.12 × 10-3 mm2/sec before GKS. This value rose significantly(p < 0.0001) to 1.64 ± 0.18 × 10-3 mm2/sec after GKS at a mean follow-up of 9.4 months. Magnetic resonance imaging showed that 89% of these tumors had been controlled by GKS. In 2 patients there were enlarged lesions, but the ADC values were the same as pre-GKS levels, and therefore, the lesions were deemed recurrent.
CONCLUSIONS: Apparent diffusion coefficient values may be useful in evaluating treatment results before a definitive change in volume is evident on imaging studies. In some patients in whom imaging findings are equivocal, ADC values may also be used to distinguish radiation-induced necrosis from tumor recurrence.(DOI: 10.3171/2010.7.GKS10864)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21222290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  7 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of treatment response in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: role of state-of-the-art cross-sectional imaging.

Authors:  Venkata S Katabathina; Nathalie Lassau; Ivan Pedrosa; Chaan S Ng; Srinivasa R Prasad
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Conventional MRI does not reliably distinguish radiation necrosis from tumor recurrence after stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Abigail L Stockham; Andrew L Tievsky; Shlomo A Koyfman; Chandana A Reddy; John H Suh; Michael A Vogelbaum; Gene H Barnett; Samuel T Chao
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Apparent diffusion coefficient of intracranial germ cell tumors.

Authors:  Hideki Ogiwara; Yoshiyuki Tsutsumi; Kentarou Matsuoka; Chikako Kiyotani; Keita Terashima; Nobuhito Morota
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Imaging challenges of immunotherapy and targeted therapy in patients with brain metastases: response, progression, and pseudoprogression.

Authors:  Norbert Galldiks; Martin Kocher; Garry Ceccon; Jan-Michael Werner; Anna Brunn; Martina Deckert; Whitney B Pope; Riccardo Soffietti; Emilie Le Rhun; Michael Weller; Jörg C Tonn; Gereon R Fink; Karl-Josef Langen
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 5.  Diffusion MRI in early cancer therapeutic response assessment.

Authors:  C J Galbán; B A Hoff; T L Chenevert; B D Ross
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 6.  Stereotactic radiotherapy for brain oligometastases.

Authors:  Marco Lupattelli; Paolo Tini; Valerio Nardone; Cynthia Aristei; Simona Borghesi; Ernesto Maranzano; Paola Anselmo; Gianluca Ingrosso; Letizia Deantonio; Michela Buglione di Monale E Bastia
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2022-03-22

7.  Serial MR diffusion to predict treatment response in high-grade pediatric brain tumors: a comparison of regional and voxel-based diffusion change metrics.

Authors:  Daniel Rodriguez Gutierrez; Muftah Manita; Tim Jaspan; Robert A Dineen; Richard G Grundy; Dorothee P Auer
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 12.300

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.