INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the feasibility of employing a self-expanding stent (Neuroform) in treatment of acute cerebral ischemia and compared the results of primary and secondary stenting. METHODS: We analyzed the treatment results of 14 acute ischemic stroke patients (11 men and three women; median age, 65 years) who were treated with Neuroform stents. Seven patients received stent placement for primary recanalization and a further seven for secondary recanalization. We performed between-group comparisons of all of overall procedure duration, recanalization rate immediately after stenting, need for additional measures after stenting, final recanalization rate, occurrence of hemorrhagic transformation, early re-occlusion rate after 24 h, and 3-month functional recovery rate (mRS ≤2). RESULTS: The median interval from femoral puncture to stent placement was 61.5 min and was significantly shorter in the primary than in the secondary group (55 vs. 95 min, p = 0.004). The recanalization rate immediately after stenting was 42.9% and was greater in the primary than in the secondary group (71.4% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.1). Thirteen patients required various additional therapeutic measures. The final recanalization rate was 78.6%, attributable to improvements in the recanalization rate of the secondary group (71.4% vs. 85.7%). Early hemorrhagic transformation was noted in four patients, but only one patient became symptomatic (symptomatic hemorrhage, 7.1%). Good functional recovery was noted in eight patients (57.1%). CONCLUSION: Placement of a self-expanding stent during endovascular recanalization of acute ischemic stroke was both feasible and safe. Primary use of this method may enhance early recanalization.
INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the feasibility of employing a self-expanding stent (Neuroform) in treatment of acute cerebral ischemia and compared the results of primary and secondary stenting. METHODS: We analyzed the treatment results of 14 acute ischemic strokepatients (11 men and three women; median age, 65 years) who were treated with Neuroform stents. Seven patients received stent placement for primary recanalization and a further seven for secondary recanalization. We performed between-group comparisons of all of overall procedure duration, recanalization rate immediately after stenting, need for additional measures after stenting, final recanalization rate, occurrence of hemorrhagic transformation, early re-occlusion rate after 24 h, and 3-month functional recovery rate (mRS ≤2). RESULTS: The median interval from femoral puncture to stent placement was 61.5 min and was significantly shorter in the primary than in the secondary group (55 vs. 95 min, p = 0.004). The recanalization rate immediately after stenting was 42.9% and was greater in the primary than in the secondary group (71.4% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.1). Thirteen patients required various additional therapeutic measures. The final recanalization rate was 78.6%, attributable to improvements in the recanalization rate of the secondary group (71.4% vs. 85.7%). Early hemorrhagic transformation was noted in four patients, but only one patient became symptomatic (symptomatic hemorrhage, 7.1%). Good functional recovery was noted in eight patients (57.1%). CONCLUSION: Placement of a self-expanding stent during endovascular recanalization of acute ischemic stroke was both feasible and safe. Primary use of this method may enhance early recanalization.
Authors: Doris D M Lin; Philippe Gailloud; Norman J Beauchamp; Eric M Aldrich; Robert J Wityk; Kieran J Murphy Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: E I Levy; R Mehta; R Gupta; R A Hanel; A J Chamczuk; D Fiorella; H H Woo; F C Albuquerque; T G Jovin; M B Horowitz; L N Hopkins Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Elad I Levy; Adnan H Siddiqui; Annemarie Crumlish; Kenneth V Snyder; Erik F Hauck; David J Fiorella; L Nelson Hopkins; J Mocco Journal: Stroke Date: 2009-08-20 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: S H Suh; B M Kim; H G Roh; K-Y Lee; S I Park; D I Kim; D J Kim; H S Nam; H S Choi Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2009-11-05 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Elad I Levy; Robert D Ecker; Michael B Horowitz; Rishi Gupta; Ricardo A Hanel; Eric Sauvageau; Tudor G Jovin; Lee R Guterman; L Nelson Hopkins Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: F Dorn; A Kuntze-Soderqvist; S Popp; H Lockau; B Haller; C Zimmer; T Andersson; T Liebig Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2011-10-21 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Jens Fiehler; Michael Söderman; Francis Turjman; Philip M White; Søren Jacob Bakke; Salvatore Mangiafico; Rüdiger von Kummer; Mario Muto; Christophe Cognard; Jan Gralla Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2012-09-05 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: George M Ghobrial; Nohra Chalouhi; Lana Rivers; Samantha Witte; Justin Davanzo; Richard Dalyai; Michelle L Gardecki; Pascal Jabbour; Fernando Gonzalez; Aaron S Dumont; Robert H Rosenwasser; Stavropoula Tjoumakaris Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2012-07-11 Impact factor: 5.836