Literature DB >> 21220605

Therapeutic advances in acute myeloid leukemia.

Alan Burnett1, Meir Wetzler, Bob Löwenberg.   

Abstract

The choice of treatment approach and outcome in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) depends on the age of the patient. In younger patients, arbitrarily defined as being younger than 60 years, 70% to 80% enter complete disease remission with several anthracycline-based chemotherapy combinations. Consolidation with high-dose cytarabine or stem-cell transplantation in high-risk patients will restrict overall relapse to approximately 50%. A number of demographic features can predict the outcome of treatment including cytogenetics and an increasing list of molecular features (ie, FLT3, NPM1, MLL, WT1, CEBPalpha, EVI1). These are increasingly being used to direct postinduction therapy, but they are also molecular targets for a new generation of small molecule inhibitors that are in early development; however, randomized data have yet to emerge. In older patients who comprise the majority, which will increase with demographic change, the initial clinical decision to be made is whether the patient should receive an intensive or nonintensive approach. If the same anthracycline/cytarabine-based approach is deployed, the remission rate will be around 50%, but the risk of subsequent relapse is approximately 85% at 3 years. This difference from younger patients is explained partly by the ability of patients to tolerate effective therapy, and also the aggregation of several poor risk factors compared with the young. There remains a substantial proportion of patients older than 60 years who do not receive intensive chemotherapy. Their survival is approximately 4 months, but there is considerable interest in developing new treatments for this patient group, including novel nucleoside analogs and several other agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21220605     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.1820

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  276 in total

1.  Overexpression of Evi-1 oncoprotein represses TGF-β signaling in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Xiyun Deng; Yanna Cao; Yan Liu; Fazhi Li; Kamalanathan Sambandam; Srinivasan Rajaraman; Archibald S Perkins; Alan P Fields; Mark R Hellmich; Courtney M Townsend; E Aubrey Thompson; Tien C Ko
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 4.784

2.  [Current treatment options in acute myeloid leukemia].

Authors:  M Heuser; R F Schlenk; A Ganser
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 0.743

3.  Elacytarabine has single-agent activity in patients with advanced acute myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  Susan O'Brien; David A Rizzieri; Norbert Vey; Farhad Ravandi; Utz O Krug; Mikkael A Sekeres; Mike Dennis; Adriano Venditti; Donald A Berry; Tove Flem Jacobsen; Karin Staudacher; Trygve Bergeland; Francis J Giles
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 6.998

4.  Acid ceramidase promotes drug resistance in acute myeloid leukemia through NF-κB-dependent P-glycoprotein upregulation.

Authors:  Su-Fern Tan; Wendy Dunton; Xin Liu; Todd E Fox; Samy A F Morad; Dhimant Desai; Kenichiro Doi; Mark R Conaway; Shantu Amin; David F Claxton; Hong-Gang Wang; Mark Kester; Myles C Cabot; David J Feith; Thomas P Loughran
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 5.922

5.  Phase I clinical, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic study of the Akt-inhibitor triciribine phosphate monohydrate in patients with advanced hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  Deepa Sampath; Asifa Malik; William Plunkett; Billie Nowak; Betsy Williams; Michelle Burton; Srdan Verstovsek; Stefan Faderl; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Alan F List; Said Sebti; Hagop M Kantarjian; Farhad Ravandi; Jeffrey E Lancet
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.156

6.  Who should be transplanted in first remission of acute myeloid leukaemia?

Authors:  Alan K Burnett; Robert K Hills
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2011-12

7.  Next-generation sequencing-based multigene mutational screening for acute myeloid leukemia using MiSeq: applicability for diagnostics and disease monitoring.

Authors:  Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Keyur P Patel; Neelima G Reddy; Varan Haghshenas; Mark J Routbort; Michael A Harmon; Bedia A Barkoh; Rashmi Kanagal-Shamanna; Farhad Ravandi; Jorge E Cortes; Hagop M Kantarjian; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Rajesh R Singh
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 8.  Timed sequential therapy for acute myelogenous leukemia: Results of a retrospective study of 301 patients and review of the literature.

Authors:  Kelly J Norsworthy; Amy E DeZern; Hua-Ling Tsai; Wesley A Hand; Ravi Varadhan; Steven D Gore; Ivana Gojo; Keith Pratz; Hetty E Carraway; Margaret Showel; Michael A McDevitt; Douglas Gladstone; Gabriel Ghiaur; Gabrielle Prince; Amy H Seung; Dina Benani; Mark J Levis; Judith E Karp; B Douglas Smith
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 3.156

9.  Prognostic significance of IDH1 mutations in acute myeloid leukemia: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jian-Hua Feng; Xiao-Ping Guo; Yuan-Yuan Chen; Zhu-Jun Wang; Yu-Ping Cheng; Yong-Min Tang
Journal:  Am J Blood Res       Date:  2012-11-25

10.  High-dose idarubicin plus busulfan as conditioning regimen to autologous stem cell transplantation: promising post-remission therapy for acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission?

Authors:  Ming Hong; Kou-Rong Miao; Run Zhang; Hua Lu; Peng Liu; Wei Xu; Li-Juan Chen; Su-Jiang Zhang; Han-Xin Wu; Hong-Xia Qiu; Jian-Yong Li; Si-Xuan Qian
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.