Literature DB >> 21220547

Identification of compounds that decrease the fidelity of start codon recognition by the eukaryotic translational machinery.

Julie E Takacs1, Timothy B Neary, Nicholas T Ingolia, Adesh K Saini, Pilar Martin-Marcos, Jerry Pelletier, Alan G Hinnebusch, Jon R Lorsch.   

Abstract

Translation initiation in eukaryotes involves more than a dozen protein factors. Alterations in six factors have been found to reduce the fidelity of start codon recognition by the ribosomal preinitiation complex in yeast, a phenotype referred to as Sui(-). No small molecules are known that affect the fidelity of start codon recognition. Such compounds would be useful tools for probing the molecular mechanics of translation initiation and its regulation. To find compounds with this effect, we set up a high-throughput screen using a dual luciferase assay in S. cerevisiae. Screening of over 55,000 compounds revealed two structurally related molecules that decrease the fidelity of start codon selection by approximately twofold in the dual luciferase assay. This effect was confirmed using additional in vivo assays that monitor translation from non-AUG start codons. Both compounds increase translation of a natural upstream open reading frame previously shown to initiate translation at a UUG. The compounds were also found to exacerbate increased use of UUG as a start codon (Sui(-) phenotype) conferred by haploinsufficiency of wild-type eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 1, or by mutation in eIF1. Furthermore, the effects of the compounds are suppressed by overexpressing eIF1, which is known to restore the fidelity of start codon selection in strains harboring Sui(-) mutations in various other initiation factors. Together, these data strongly suggest that the compounds affect the translational machinery itself to reduce the accuracy of selecting AUG as the start codon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21220547      PMCID: PMC3039144          DOI: 10.1261/rna.2475211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  RNA        ISSN: 1355-8382            Impact factor:   4.942


  48 in total

1.  Recognition of cognate transfer RNA by the 30S ribosomal subunit.

Authors:  J M Ogle; D E Brodersen; W M Clemons ; M J Tarry; A P Carter; V Ramakrishnan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-05-04       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Early nonsense: mRNA decay solves a translational problem.

Authors:  Nadia Amrani; Matthew S Sachs; Allan Jacobson
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 94.444

3.  Translational efficiency of a non-AUG initiation codon is significantly affected by its sequence context in yeast.

Authors:  Shun-Jia Chen; Grace Lin; Kuang-Jung Chang; Lu-Shu Yeh; Chien-Chia Wang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Regulatory elements in eIF1A control the fidelity of start codon selection by modulating tRNA(i)(Met) binding to the ribosome.

Authors:  Adesh K Saini; Jagpreet S Nanda; Jon R Lorsch; Alan G Hinnebusch
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Genetic selection for mutations that reduce or abolish ribosomal recognition of the HIS4 translational initiator region.

Authors:  T F Donahue; A M Cigan
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Genetic characterization of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae translational initiation suppressors sui1, sui2 and SUI3 and their effects on HIS4 expression.

Authors:  B Castilho-Valavicius; H Yoon; T F Donahue
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Interactions of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 (eIF3) subunit NIP1/c with eIF1 and eIF5 promote preinitiation complex assembly and regulate start codon selection.

Authors:  Leos Valásek; Klaus H Nielsen; Fan Zhang; Christie A Fekete; Alan G Hinnebusch
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  The yeast eukaryotic initiation factor 4G (eIF4G) HEAT domain interacts with eIF1 and eIF5 and is involved in stringent AUG selection.

Authors:  Hui He; Tobias von der Haar; C Ranjit Singh; Miki Ii; Bin Li; Alan G Hinnebusch; John E G McCarthy; Katsura Asano
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Translation initiation from a naturally occurring non-AUG codon in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Kuang-Jung Chang; Chien-Chia Wang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-01-19       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Genome-wide analysis in vivo of translation with nucleotide resolution using ribosome profiling.

Authors:  Nicholas T Ingolia; Sina Ghaemmaghami; John R S Newman; Jonathan S Weissman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  14 in total

1.  Functional elements in initiation factors 1, 1A, and 2β discriminate against poor AUG context and non-AUG start codons.

Authors:  Pilar Martin-Marcos; Yuen-Nei Cheung; Alan G Hinnebusch
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Emerging therapeutics targeting mRNA translation.

Authors:  Abba Malina; John R Mills; Jerry Pelletier
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 10.005

3.  The mammalian orthoreovirus bicistronic M3 mRNA initiates translation using a 5' end-dependent, scanning mechanism that does not require interaction of 5'-3' untranslated regions.

Authors:  Vidya Sagar; Kenneth E Murray
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 3.303

4.  eIF2γ mutation that disrupts eIF2 complex integrity links intellectual disability to impaired translation initiation.

Authors:  Guntram Borck; Byung-Sik Shin; Barbara Stiller; Aviva Mimouni-Bloch; Holger Thiele; Joo-Ran Kim; Meghna Thakur; Cindy Skinner; Lara Aschenbach; Pola Smirin-Yosef; Adi Har-Zahav; Gudrun Nürnberg; Janine Altmüller; Peter Frommolt; Kay Hofmann; Osnat Konen; Peter Nürnberg; Arnold Munnich; Charles E Schwartz; Doron Gothelf; Laurence Colleaux; Thomas E Dever; Christian Kubisch; Lina Basel-Vanagaite
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Ribosomes slide on lysine-encoding homopolymeric A stretches.

Authors:  Kristin S Koutmou; Anthony P Schuller; Julie L Brunelle; Aditya Radhakrishnan; Sergej Djuranovic; Rachel Green
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Translation Initiation from Conserved Non-AUG Codons Provides Additional Layers of Regulation and Coding Capacity.

Authors:  Ivaylo P Ivanov; Jiajie Wei; Stephen Z Caster; Kristina M Smith; Audrey M Michel; Ying Zhang; Andrew E Firth; Michael Freitag; Jay C Dunlap; Deborah Bell-Pedersen; John F Atkins; Matthew S Sachs
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 7.786

Review 7.  How Ribosomes Translate Cancer.

Authors:  Sergey O Sulima; Isabel J F Hofman; Kim De Keersmaecker; Jonathan D Dinman
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 39.397

8.  Specialized yeast ribosomes: a customized tool for selective mRNA translation.

Authors:  Johann W Bauer; Clemens Brandl; Olaf Haubenreisser; Bjoern Wimmer; Manuela Weber; Thomas Karl; Alfred Klausegger; Michael Breitenbach; Helmut Hintner; Tobias von der Haar; Mick F Tuite; Lore Breitenbach-Koller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Conserved residues in yeast initiator tRNA calibrate initiation accuracy by regulating preinitiation complex stability at the start codon.

Authors:  Jinsheng Dong; Antonio Munoz; Sarah E Kolitz; Adesh K Saini; Wen-ling Chiu; Hafsa Rahman; Jon R Lorsch; Alan G Hinnebusch
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  Influence of translation factor activities on start site selection in six different mRNAs.

Authors:  Daine Barth-Baus; C Ramana Bhasker; Wendy Zoll; William C Merrick
Journal:  Translation (Austin)       Date:  2013-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.