Literature DB >> 21219721

Validation of a 2 percent lactic acid antimicrobial rinse for mobile poultry slaughter operations.

Karen M Killinger1, Aditi Kannan, Andy I Bary, Craig G Cogger.   

Abstract

Poultry processing antimicrobial interventions are critical for pathogen control, and organic, mobile operations in Washington seek alternatives to chlorine. Laboratory and field studies (three replications each) evaluated lactic acid efficacy as a chlorine alternative. For the laboratory study, retail-purchased, conventionally processed chicken wings inoculated with Salmonella were randomly assigned to the following treatments: Salmonella inoculation followed by no treatment (10 wings) or by 3-min rinses of water, 50 to 100 ppm of chlorine, or 2% lactic acid (20 wings for each rinse treatment). Wings were sampled for Salmonella enumeration on xylose lysine desoxycholate agar. During pastured poultry processing at mobile slaughter units for each field study replication, 20 chicken carcasses were randomly assigned to each treatment: untreated control or 3-min immersion in lactic acid or chlorine. Whole-carcass rinses were examined for aerobic plate count (APC) on tryptic soy agar and coliforms on violet red bile agar. Untreated controls were also examined for Salmonella. In the laboratory study, lactic acid produced a significant (P < 0.01) Salmonella reduction compared with the inoculated no-rinse, water, and chlorine treatments, which were statistically similar to each other. In the field study, no Salmonella was detected on untreated controls. Lactic acid produced significant >2-log (P < 0.01) reductions in APC and coliforms, whereas chlorine resulted in slight, but significant 0.4-log reductions (P < 0.01) and 0.21-log reductions (P < 0.05) in APC and coliforms compared with untreated controls. Considering laboratory and field studies, lactic acid produced greater reductions in Salmonella, APC, and coliforms, validating its effectiveness as a chlorine alternative in mobile poultry slaughter operations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21219721     DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-73.11.2079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Prot        ISSN: 0362-028X            Impact factor:   2.077


  3 in total

1.  Effects of lactic, malic and fumaric acids on Salmonella spp. counts and on chicken meat quality and sensory characteristics.

Authors:  Marina Mozgovoj; Mariana Cap; Mariano Fernández; Anabel Rodríguez; Micaela Fulco; Trinidad Soteras
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Impact of Built-up-Litter and Commercial Antimicrobials on Salmonella and Campylobacter Contamination of Broiler Carcasses Processed at a Pilot Mobile Poultry-Processing Unit.

Authors:  KaWang Li; Lacey Lemonakis; Brian Glover; Joseph Moritz; Cangliang Shen
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-06-09

Review 3.  Emerging Trends for Nonthermal Decontamination of Raw and Processed Meat: Ozonation, High-Hydrostatic Pressure and Cold Plasma.

Authors:  Ume Roobab; James S Chacha; Afeera Abida; Sidra Rashid; Ghulam Muhammad Madni; Jose Manuel Lorenzo; Xin-An Zeng; Rana Muhammad Aadil
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-07-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.