Literature DB >> 21218185

USING POPULATION GENOMICS TO DETECT SELECTION IN NATURAL POPULATIONS: KEY CONCEPTS AND METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS.

Paul A Hohenlohe1, Patrick C Phillips, William A Cresko.   

Abstract

Natural selection shapes patterns of genetic variation among individuals, populations, and species, and it does so differentially across genomes. The field of population genomics provides a comprehensive genome-scale view of the action of selection, even beyond traditional model organisms. However, even with nearly complete genomic sequence information, our ability to detect the signature of selection on specific genomic regions depends on choosing experimental and analytical tools appropriate to the biological situation. For example, processes that occur at different timescales, such as sorting of standing genetic variation, mutation-selection balance, or fixed interspecific divergence, have different consequences for genomic patterns of variation. Inappropriate experimental or analytical approaches may fail to detect even strong selection or falsely identify a signature of selection. Here we outline the conceptual framework of population genomics, relate genomic patterns of variation to evolutionary processes, and identify major biological factors to be considered in studies of selection. As data-gathering technology continues to advance, our ability to understand selection in natural populations will be limited more by conceptual and analytical weaknesses than by the amount of molecular data. Our aim is to bring critical biological considerations to the fore in population genomics research and to spur the development and application of analytical tools appropriate to diverse biological systems.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21218185      PMCID: PMC3016716          DOI: 10.1086/656306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Plant Sci        ISSN: 1058-5893            Impact factor:   1.785


  83 in total

1.  Personal genomes: The case of the missing heritability.

Authors:  Brendan Maher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  From genotype to phenotype: systems biology meets natural variation.

Authors:  Philip N Benfey; Thomas Mitchell-Olds
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Molecular networks as sensors and drivers of common human diseases.

Authors:  Eric E Schadt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Positive natural selection in the human lineage.

Authors:  P C Sabeti; S F Schaffner; B Fry; J Lohmueller; P Varilly; O Shamovsky; A Palma; T S Mikkelsen; D Altshuler; E S Lander
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-06-16       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations.

Authors:  Y X Fu; W H Li
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection.

Authors:  W G Hill; A Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

Review 8.  Linkage disequilibrium--understanding the evolutionary past and mapping the medical future.

Authors:  Montgomery Slatkin
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 53.242

9.  Detecting positive selection from genome scans of linkage disequilibrium.

Authors:  Chad D Huff; Henry C Harpending; Alan R Rogers
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  The genetics of human adaptation: hard sweeps, soft sweeps, and polygenic adaptation.

Authors:  Jonathan K Pritchard; Joseph K Pickrell; Graham Coop
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  69 in total

1.  Novel tools for an old lineage: Population genomics for cycads.

Authors:  Angelica Cibrián-Jaramillo; Thomas E Marler
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2011-07-01

2.  Harnessing genomics for delineating conservation units.

Authors:  W Chris Funk; John K McKay; Paul A Hohenlohe; Fred W Allendorf
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Extensive linkage disequilibrium and parallel adaptive divergence across threespine stickleback genomes.

Authors:  Paul A Hohenlohe; Susan Bassham; Mark Currey; William A Cresko
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Transcriptome resources for the white-footed mouse (Peromyscus leucopus): new genomic tools for investigating ecologically divergent urban and rural populations.

Authors:  Stephen E Harris; Rachel J O'Neill; Jason Munshi-South
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 7.090

5.  Genomic signatures reveal new evidences for selection of important traits in domestic cattle.

Authors:  Lingyang Xu; Derek M Bickhart; John B Cole; Steven G Schroeder; Jiuzhou Song; Curtis P Van Tassell; Tad S Sonstegard; George E Liu
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Local adaptation (mostly) remains local: reassessing environmental associations of climate-related candidate SNPs in Arabidopsis halleri.

Authors:  C Rellstab; M C Fischer; S Zoller; R Graf; A Tedder; K K Shimizu; A Widmer; R Holderegger; F Gugerli
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 7.  Evolution and population genomics of the Lyme borreliosis pathogen, Borrelia burgdorferi.

Authors:  Stephanie N Seifert; Camilo E Khatchikian; Wei Zhou; Dustin Brisson
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 8.  Finding the Genomic Basis of Local Adaptation: Pitfalls, Practical Solutions, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Sean Hoban; Joanna L Kelley; Katie E Lotterhos; Michael F Antolin; Gideon Bradburd; David B Lowry; Mary L Poss; Laura K Reed; Andrew Storfer; Michael C Whitlock
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  The population structure and recent colonization history of Oregon threespine stickleback determined using restriction-site associated DNA-sequencing.

Authors:  Julian Catchen; Susan Bassham; Taylor Wilson; Mark Currey; Conor O'Brien; Quick Yeates; William A Cresko
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  Stacks: an analysis tool set for population genomics.

Authors:  Julian Catchen; Paul A Hohenlohe; Susan Bassham; Angel Amores; William A Cresko
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 6.185

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.