| Literature DB >> 21218118 |
Jana Králová1, Michaela Pekarová, Katarína Drábiková, Viera Jančinová, Radomír Nosáľ, Milan Cíž, Antonín Lojek.
Abstract
As reported in our previous studies, dithiaden (an antagonist of histamine H(1)-receptor, used clinically as an anti-allergic or anti-emetic drug) in a concentration range of 5×10(-5)-10(-4) M decreased the production of reactive oxygen species by phagocytes. In this study we investigated the influence of dithiaden on nitric oxide (NO) production by LPS-stimulated macrophages.The cell viability in the presence of 10(-4)-5×10(-5) M dithiaden was evaluated by an ATP-test. RAW 264.7 cells (2.5×10(6)/well) were preincubated with dithiaden for 60 mins and subsequently stimulated with 0.1 µg/ml of bacterial lipopolysaccharide. After incubating for 24 hours the NO production was determined spectrophotometrically using Griess reaction as a concentration of nitrites (the end product of NO metabolism) accumulated in the cell supernatants. The expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in cell-lysates was evaluated using Western blot analysis. Scavenging properties of dithiaden against NO were evaluated amperometrically.Our data demonstrate that dithiaden in the concentration of 5×10(-5) M (approved by ATP test as non toxic) caused a significant decrease in the accumulation of nitrites, and in addition, this decline was followed by a marked reduction of iNOS protein expression. Amperometrical analysis did not show any scavenging properties of dithiaden against NO.From this data it can be suggested that the inhibition effect of dithiaden on macrophage NO production is caused exclusively by the suppression of iNOS protein expression.Entities:
Keywords: RAW 264.7 cells; dithiaden; inducible nitric oxide synthase; lipopolysaccharide; nitric oxide; nitrites
Year: 2008 PMID: 21218118 PMCID: PMC2994028 DOI: 10.2478/v10102-010-0044-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Interdiscip Toxicol ISSN: 1337-6853
Figure 1The effect of dithiaden on the concentration of nitrites in the supernatant collected from RAW 264.7 cells stimulated by 0.1 µM LPS after a 24 hour incubation period at 37°C in comparison with non-treated cells (control). Data are expressed as percentages of the control. Values represent mean ± SEM, n=3. Asterisks show significant differences as compared to control, p<0.05 was considered as statistically significant as compared to control.
Figure 2The expression of iNOS in the cell lysates from RAW 264.7 cells stimulated by 0.1 µM LPS after 24 hour incubation with 5×10−5 M dithiaden at 37°C in comparison with non-treated cells (control). Data are expressed as percentages of the control. Values represent mean ± SEM, n=3. Asterisks show significant differences as compared to control, p<0.05 was considered as statistically significant as compared to control.
Figure 3The effect of 5×10−5 M dithiaden against nitric oxide (NO) evaluated amperometrically. The electrochemical signal was induced by the addition of the NO stock solution as described in the text. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 3.