| Literature DB >> 21217875 |
Vladislav Eybl1, Dana Kotyzová.
Abstract
Oxidative tissue damage is considered an early sign of cadmium (Cd) toxicity and has been linked with carcinogenesis. Manganese(II)-at low doses, was found to act as a potent antioxidant against oxidative stress in different in vitro systems producing lipid peroxidation conditions. The present study investigates in vivo antioxidant effects of Mn(2+) pretreatment in acute Cd intoxication with regard to lipid peroxidation, antioxidant defense system and cadmium distribution in the tissues of mice. Four groups of male mice (n=7-8) were used: Cd group was injected sc a single dose of CdCl(2) · 2½ H(2)O · (7 mg/kg b.w.); Cd+Mn group was treated ip with MnCl(2) · 4H(2)O (20 mg/kg b.w.) 24 hours before Cd intoxication; Mn group received manganese treatment only; Control group received saline only. Twenty-four hours after Cd intoxication an increased lipid peroxidation (p<0.05), depleted GSH level (p<0.01), increased activity of GSH-Px (p<0.05) and inhibited CAT activity (p<0.01) were found in Cd-treated group compared to controls. Manganese(II) pre-treatment either completely prevented (LP, GSH, GSH-Px) or significantly attenuated (CAT) these changes. Manganese(II) treatment alone decreased LP, enhanced hepatic GSH level and had no effect on antioxidant enzymes compared to control group. A significant increase of Cd concentration in the liver and decreased Cd concentration in the kidneys and testes were found in Cd+Mn treated mice compared to Cd-only treated group. The effect of manganese may result from a different metallothionein induction in particular organs. Manganese(II) pretreatment attenuated the interference of cadmium with Ca homeostasis, the alteration in Zn and Cu levels remained mostly unaffected.Entities:
Keywords: cadmium; essential elements; manganese; oxidative stress
Year: 2010 PMID: 21217875 PMCID: PMC2984133 DOI: 10.2478/v10102-010-0013-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Interdiscip Toxicol ISSN: 1337-6853
Figure 1The effect of Mn2+ on the lipid peroxidation in the liver of Cd-intoxicated mice. Data represent mean ± SD; N=7 animals in control and Mn groups, N=8 animals in Cd and Cd+Mn groups; Significant differences: *p<0.05 vs. control group, #p<0.05 vs. Cd group.
Figure 2The effect of Mn2+ on glutathione depletion in the liver of Cd-intoxicated mice. Data represent mean ± SD; N=7 animals in control and Mn groups, N=8 animals in Cd and Cd+Mn groups; Significant differences: **p<0.01 vs. control group, ##p<0.01 vs. Cd group.
Figure 3The effect of Mn2+ on GSH-Px activity in the liver of Cd-intoxicated mice. Data represent mean ± SD; N=7 animals in control and Mn groups, N=8 animals in Cd and Cd+Mn groups; Significant differences: *p<0.05 vs. control group.
Figure 4The effect of Mn2+ on catalase activity in the liver of Cd-intoxicated mice. Data represent mean ± SD; N=7 animals in control and Mn groups, N=8 animals in Cd and Cd+Mn groups; Significant differences: **p<0.01 vs. control group.
The effect of manganese on cadmium distribution in the tissues of Cd-intoxicated mice.
| Liver | Kidneys | Testes | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ≤0.2 | ≤0.2 | ≤0.02 | |
| 20.2 ± 2.6 | 9.2 ± 1.5 | 0.42 ± 0.07 | |
| 25.1 ± 3.4 | 6.0 ± 0.6 | 0.23 ± 0.04 |
Values in µg/g of tissue wet weight; presented as means ± SD of N=7 animals in control group, N=8 animals in Cd and Cd+Mn groups;
Significant differences: ## p<0.01 versus Cd-group
The effect of manganese treatment on trace element concentration in the tissues of control and Cd-intoxicated mice.
| Ca | Mg | Zn | Cu | Fe | Mn | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30.5 ± 1.8 | 246 ± 21 | 22.5 ± 3.1 | 3.94 ± 0.42 | 81 ± 15 | 0.89 ± 0.12 | |
| 45.0 ± 9.5 | 235 ± 29 | 33.8 ± 4.9 | 4.25 ± 0.49 | 105 ± 32 | 0.92 ± 0.11 | |
| 35.9 ± 4.5 | 243 ± 32 | 34.9 ± 4.1 | 4.25 ± 0.56 | 90 ± 19 | 1.41 ± 0.27 | |
| 30.5 ± 1.4 | 216 ± 8 | 21.7 ± 1.8 | 3.40 ± 0.28 | 71 ± 13 | 1.08 ± 0.10 | |
| 52.6 ± 5.8 | 211 ± 10 | 16.8 ± 0.8 | 3.27 ± 0.19 | 35.6 ± 2.3 | 1.38 ± 0.13 | |
| 53.5 ± 6.5 | 217 ± 10 | 19.4 ± 0.6 | 3.44 ± 0.24 | 35.6 ± 4.0 | 1.20 ± 0.11 | |
| 50.4 ± 2.4 | 204 ± 4 | 17.6 ± 0.3 | 3.37 ± 0.25 | 35.2 ± 3.2 | 3.10 ± 0.44 | |
| 55.6 ± 9.8 | 210 ± 5 | 15.7 ± 0.6 | 3.07 ± 0.21 | 34.5 ± 2.2 | 3.10 ± 0.43 | |
| 41.8 ± 5.9 | 165 ± 6 | 19.4 ± 2.9 | 1.23 ± 0.10 | 11.6 ± 0.8 | n.a. | |
| 181 ± 32 | 64 ± 11 | 14.5 ± 2.4 | 0.96 ± 0.12 | 39.2 ± 19 | n.a. | |
| 139 ± 8 | 65 ± 6 | 13.6 ± 0.8 | 0.98 ± 0.05 | 24.7 ± 2.6 | n.a. | |
| 39.4 ± 2.8 | 160 ± 4 | 17.3 ± 0.6 | 1.17 ± 0.05 | 11.8 ± 1.4 | n.a. | |
Values in mg/g of tissue wet weight; presented as mean ± SD; N=7 animals in control and Mn groups, N=8 animals in Cd and Cd+Mn groups;
Significant differences: *p<0.05 and
**p<0.01 versus control group;
# p<0.05 and
## p<0.01 versus Cd-group;
n.a.=not analysed