Literature DB >> 21217102

Crossing the technology divide: practical strategies for transitioning patients from multiple daily insulin injections to sensor-augmented pump therapy.

Richard R Rubin1, Sarah K Borgman2, Becky T Sulik3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the benefits of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) systems compared with self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) and multiple daily injection (MDI) therapy; to assess the benefits of sensor-augmented pump therapy (SAPT) in patients with type 1 diabetes; and to present an evidence-based practical protocol for introducing SAPT in patients with no prior pump or CGM experience.
CONCLUSION: Continuous glucose monitoring and CSII have advantages over SMBG and MDI, respectively, in terms of A1C and hypoglycemia reduction. The Sensor-Augmented Pump Therapy for A1C Reduction (STAR) 3 trial demonstrated that initiating both CGM and CSII in selected adult and pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes unable to meet glycemic goals with intensive insulin injection therapy significantly improved glucose control. In all subjects using SAPT, A1C levels fell rapidly from baseline to 3 months and remained significantly lower than among subjects in the SMBG+MDI group for 1 year. A distinguishing feature of the STAR 3 study was its stepwise protocol for systematizing education and self-management support using Web-based training modules and therapy management software. The demonstrated strengths of this education protocol recommend it as a model for implementing SAPT in the broader population of patients with type 1 diabetes who have not achieved their glycemic goals with optimized MDI therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21217102     DOI: 10.1177/0145721710391107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Educ        ISSN: 0145-7217            Impact factor:   2.140


  5 in total

1.  Health-related quality of life and treatment satisfaction in the Sensor-Augmented Pump Therapy for A1C Reduction 3 (STAR 3) trial.

Authors:  Richard R Rubin; Mark Peyrot
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 6.118

2.  Optimal Use of Diabetes Devices: Clinician Perspectives on Barriers and Adherence to Device Use.

Authors:  Molly L Tanenbaum; Rebecca N Adams; Sarah J Hanes; Regan C Barley; Kellee M Miller; Shelagh A Mulvaney; Korey K Hood
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-01-10

Review 3.  Closed-loop glucose control: psychological and behavioral considerations.

Authors:  Linda Gonder-Frederick; Jaclyn Shepard; Ninoska Peterson
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-11-01

4.  A Minority of Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Routinely Downloads and Retrospectively Reviews Device Data.

Authors:  Jenise C Wong; Aaron B Neinstein; Matthew Spindler; Saleh Adi
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 6.118

5.  'Striving for freedom or remaining with what is well-known': a focus-group study of self-management among people with type 1 diabetes who have suboptimal glycaemic control despite continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion.

Authors:  Margareta Persson; Janeth Leksell; Åsa Ernersson; Ulf Rosenqvist; Åsa Hörnsten
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.