OBJECTIVES: A statute enacted in 2005 modified the legislative framework of the rights of terminally ill persons in France. Ten years after the EURONIC study, which described the self-reported practices of neonatal caregivers towards ethical decision-making, a new study was conducted to assess the impact of the new law in neonatal intensive care units (NICU) and compare the results reported by EURONIC with current practices. SETTING AND DESIGN: The study was carried out in the same two NICU as in the EURONIC qualitative study. A third centre was added to increase the sample size. From February to October 2007, 19 physicians and 17 nurses participated in semistructured interviews very similar to those for EURONIC. Content analysis identified the recurring themes emerging from the interviews. RESULTS: Compared with the EURONIC results, the caregivers reported that they pay greater attention to the views of parents and provided respectful support to the neonates when life-sustaining treatment is withdrawn. Active termination of life has become exceptional. The possibility of withdrawal of treatment, the administration of sedatives to control pain even at the risk of hastening death, the emphasis on sparing parents the burden of decision, and the relative ignorance of the law were very similar to the EURONIC findings. CONCLUSION: Both the medical and the legal regulation of practices has allowed more dialogue with the parents and more humane care for dying newborns. A new European study is necessary to investigate the possible changes in practices and attitudes also in other countries.
OBJECTIVES: A statute enacted in 2005 modified the legislative framework of the rights of terminally ill persons in France. Ten years after the EURONIC study, which described the self-reported practices of neonatal caregivers towards ethical decision-making, a new study was conducted to assess the impact of the new law in neonatal intensive care units (NICU) and compare the results reported by EURONIC with current practices. SETTING AND DESIGN: The study was carried out in the same two NICU as in the EURONIC qualitative study. A third centre was added to increase the sample size. From February to October 2007, 19 physicians and 17 nurses participated in semistructured interviews very similar to those for EURONIC. Content analysis identified the recurring themes emerging from the interviews. RESULTS: Compared with the EURONIC results, the caregivers reported that they pay greater attention to the views of parents and provided respectful support to the neonates when life-sustaining treatment is withdrawn. Active termination of life has become exceptional. The possibility of withdrawal of treatment, the administration of sedatives to control pain even at the risk of hastening death, the emphasis on sparing parents the burden of decision, and the relative ignorance of the law were very similar to the EURONIC findings. CONCLUSION: Both the medical and the legal regulation of practices has allowed more dialogue with the parents and more humane care for dying newborns. A new European study is necessary to investigate the possible changes in practices and attitudes also in other countries.
Authors: H E McHaffie; M Cuttini; G Brölz-Voit; L Randag; R Mousty; A M Duguet; B Wennergren; P Benciolini Journal: J Med Ethics Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 2.903
Authors: Marina Cuttini; Veronica Casotto; Umberto de Vonderweid; Micheline Garel; Louis A Kollée; Rodolfo Saracci Journal: Early Hum Dev Date: 2009-09-23 Impact factor: 2.079
Authors: M Rebagliato; M Cuttini; L Broggin; I Berbik; U de Vonderweid; G Hansen; M Kaminski; L A Kollée; A Kucinskas; S Lenoir; A Levin; J Persson; M Reid; R Saracci Journal: JAMA Date: 2000-11-15 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: R De Leeuw; M Cuttini; M Nadai; I Berbik; G Hansen; A Kucinskas; S Lenoir; A Levin; J Persson; M Rebagliato; M Reid; M Schroell; U de Vonderweid Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: J Colin Partridge; Alma M Martinez; Hiroshi Nishida; Nem-Yun Boo; Keng Wee Tan; Chap-Yung Yeung; Jen-Her Lu; Victor Y H Yu Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 7.124