Literature DB >> 21216631

Hepatic vessel segmentation for 3D planning of liver surgery experimental evaluation of a new fully automatic algorithm.

Francesco Conversano1, Roberto Franchini, Christian Demitri, Laurent Massoptier, Francesco Montagna, Alfonso Maffezzoli, Antonio Malvasi, Sergio Casciaro.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify the optimal parameter configuration of a new algorithm for fully automatic segmentation of hepatic vessels, evaluating its accuracy in view of its use in a computer system for three-dimensional (3D) planning of liver surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A phantom reproduction of a human liver with vessels up to the fourth subsegment order, corresponding to a minimum diameter of 0.2 mm, was realized through stereolithography, exploiting a 3D model derived from a real human computed tomographic data set. Algorithm parameter configuration was experimentally optimized, and the maximum achievable segmentation accuracy was quantified for both single two-dimensional slices and 3D reconstruction of the vessel network, through an analytic comparison of the automatic segmentation performed on contrast-enhanced computed tomographic phantom images with actual model features.
RESULTS: The optimal algorithm configuration resulted in a vessel detection sensitivity of 100% for vessels > 1 mm in diameter, 50% in the range 0.5 to 1 mm, and 14% in the range 0.2 to 0.5 mm. An average area overlap of 94.9% was obtained between automatically and manually segmented vessel sections, with an average difference of 0.06 mm(2). The average values of corresponding false-positive and false-negative ratios were 7.7% and 2.3%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: A robust and accurate algorithm for automatic extraction of the hepatic vessel tree from contrast-enhanced computed tomographic volume images was proposed and experimentally assessed on a liver model, showing unprecedented sensitivity in vessel delineation. This automatic segmentation algorithm is promising for supporting liver surgery planning and for guiding intraoperative resections.
Copyright © 2011 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21216631     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.11.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  20 in total

1.  Theranostic applications: Non-ionizing cellular and molecular imaging through innovative nanosystems for early diagnosis and therapy.

Authors:  Sergio Casciaro
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2011-10-28

2.  Quantitative measurement of contrast enhancement of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma on clinical MDCT.

Authors:  Rui Li; Tian-Wu Chen; Li-Ying Wang; Li Zhou; Hang Li; Xiao-Li Chen; Chun-Ping Li; Xiao-Ming Zhang; Ru-Hui Xiao
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2012-04-28

3.  A critical inventory of preoperative skull replicas.

Authors:  J H D Fasel; J Beinemann; K Schaller; P Gailloud
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 4.  Survey on Liver Tumour Resection Planning System: Steps, Techniques, and Parameters.

Authors:  Omar Ibrahim Alirr; Ashrani Aizzuddin Abd Rahni
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Usefulness of two-point Dixon fat-water separation technique in gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ying Ding; Sheng-Xiang Rao; Cai-Zhong Chen; Ren-Chen Li; Meng-Su Zeng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Modified simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy for an unresectable huge refractory pelvic tumor diagnosed as a rectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Takuma Nomiya; Hiroko Akamatsu; Mayumi Harada; Ibuki Ota; Yasuhito Hagiwara; Mayumi Ichikawa; Misako Miwa; Shouhei Kawashiro; Motohisa Hagiwara; Masahiro Chin; Eiji Hashizume; Kenji Nemoto
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Three-dimensional skeletonization and symbolic description in vascular imaging: preliminary results.

Authors:  L Verscheure; L Peyrodie; A S Dewalle; N Reyns; N Betrouni; S Mordon; M Vermandel
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  Do 3D Printing Models Improve Anatomical Teaching About Hepatic Segments to Medical Students? A Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Xiangxue Kong; Lanying Nie; Huijian Zhang; Zhanglin Wang; Qiang Ye; Lei Tang; Wenhua Huang; Jianyi Li
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  An overview on 3D printing for abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Andrea Pietrabissa; Stefania Marconi; Erika Negrello; Valeria Mauri; Andrea Peri; Luigi Pugliese; Enrico Maria Marone; Ferdinando Auricchio
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Comparative study of hepatic venography using non-linear-blending images, monochromatic images and low-voltage images of dual-energy CT.

Authors:  Q Wang; S Gaofeng; F Xueli; W Lijia; W Runze
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.