Literature DB >> 21213170

A comprehensive observational coding scheme for analyzing instrumental, affective, and relational communication in health care contexts.

Laura A Siminoff1, Mary M Step.   

Abstract

Many observational coding schemes have been offered to measure communication in health care settings. These schemes fall short of capturing multiple functions of communication among providers, patients, and other participants. After a brief review of observational communication coding, the authors present a comprehensive scheme for coding communication that is (a) grounded in communication theory, (b) accounts for instrumental and relational communication, and (c) captures important contextual features with tailored coding templates: the Siminoff Communication Content & Affect Program (SCCAP). To test SCCAP reliability and validity, the authors coded data from two communication studies. The SCCAP provided reliable measurement of communication variables including tailored content areas and observer ratings of speaker immediacy, affiliation, confirmation, and disconfirmation behaviors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21213170      PMCID: PMC3147015          DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2010.535109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Commun        ISSN: 1081-0730


  23 in total

1.  The relationship between residents' and attending physicians' communication during primary care visits: an illustrative use of the Roter Interaction Analysis System.

Authors:  D L Roter; S Larson
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2001

2.  Analyzing patient participation in medical encounters.

Authors:  R L Street; B Millay
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2001

3.  A conceptual framework for patient-professional communication: an application to the cancer context.

Authors:  D Feldman-Stewart; M D Brundage; C Tishelman
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Effects of affiliation arousal (hope of closeness) and affiliation stress (fear of rejection) on progesterone and cortisol.

Authors:  Michelle M Wirth; Oliver C Schultheiss
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2006-09-28       Impact factor: 3.587

5.  Physicians' communication style and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  M K Buller; D B Buller
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1987-12

6.  Patient participation in medical consultations: why some patients are more involved than others.

Authors:  Richard L Street; Howard S Gordon; Michael M Ward; Edward Krupat; Richard L Kravitz
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Cancer communication patterns and the influence of patient characteristics: disparities in information-giving and affective behaviors.

Authors:  Laura A Siminoff; Gregory C Graham; Nahida H Gordon
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2006-07-24

8.  Affective and instrumental communication in primary care interactions: predicting the satisfaction of nursing staff and patients.

Authors:  Kelly B Haskard; M Robin DiMatteo; John Heritage
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2009-01

9.  Modeling patient-centered communication: oncologist relational communication and patient communication involvement in breast cancer adjuvant therapy decision-making.

Authors:  Mary M Step; Julia Hannum Rose; Jeffrey M Albert; Vinay K Cheruvu; Laura A Siminoff
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-10-06

10.  Computer-based interaction analysis of the cancer consultation.

Authors:  P N Butow; S M Dunn; M H Tattersall; Q J Jones
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  11 in total

1.  An exploratory study of relational, persuasive, and nonverbal communication in requests for tissue donation.

Authors:  Laura A Siminoff; Heather M Traino; Nahida H Gordon
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2011-05-24

2.  Physician use of persuasion and colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Jennifer Elston Lafata; Tracy Wunderlich; Susan A Flocke; Nancy Oja-Tebbe; Karen E Dyer; Laura A Siminoff
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Consenting to donation: an examination of current practices in informed consent for tissue donation in the US.

Authors:  Laura A Siminoff; Heather M Traino
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 1.522

Review 4.  The advantages and challenges of unannounced standardized patient methodology to assess healthcare communication.

Authors:  Laura A Siminoff; Heather L Rogers; Allison C Waller; Sonja Harris-Haywood; Ronald M Esptein; Francesc Borrell Carrio; Gayle Gliva-McConvey; Daniel R Longo
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-03

5.  Fears, Uncertainties, and Hopes: Patient-Initiated Actions and Doctors' Responses During Oncology Interviews.

Authors:  Wayne A Beach; David M Dozier
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2015-07-02

6.  Impact of Patient Gender and Race and Physician Communication on Colorectal Cancer Diagnostic Visits in Primary Care.

Authors:  Heather L Rogers; Levent Dumenci; Ronald M Epstein; Laura A Siminoff
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  The interpersonal process in tissue donation requests with "undecided" next of kin.

Authors:  Lindsey Dorflinger; Stephen M Auerbach; Laura A Siminoff
Journal:  Prog Transplant       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.187

8.  Patients' and family members' views on patient-centered communication during cancer care.

Authors:  Kathleen M Mazor; Reneé L Beard; Gwen L Alexander; Neeraj K Arora; Cassandra Firneno; Bridget Gaglio; Sarah M Greene; Celeste A Lemay; Brandi E Robinson; Douglas W Roblin; Kathleen Walsh; Richard L Street; Thomas H Gallagher
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  Using artificial intelligence to analyse and teach communication in healthcare.

Authors:  Phyllis Butow; Ehsan Hoque
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 4.380

Review 10.  Measurement of physician-patient communication--a systematic review.

Authors:  Jördis M Zill; Eva Christalle; Evamaria Müller; Martin Härter; Jörg Dirmaier; Isabelle Scholl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.