Literature DB >> 21212646

Is there a paternal age effect for aneuploidy?

K G L Fonseka1, D K Griffin.   

Abstract

Finding a positive association between paternal age and the incidence of aneuploidy is not difficult. A cursory analysis however reveals that any association is indirect, brought about by a close correlation between paternal age and maternal age. Approaches for dissecting out the confounding age effects of the mother has led to a lively exchange among epidemiologists, with perhaps a consensus for the absence of a paternal age effect, at least for trisomy 21. Molecular studies revealed the relatively minor contribution of paternal errors to trisomy, but even research on the paternally derived trisomies alone has been inconclusive; thus studies focussed directly on the sperm heads. Human-hamster fusion assays were superseded by FISH for establishing any possible link between age and the proportion of disomic sperm in an ejaculate. Despite innumerable microscope hours however, although convincing studies suggesting an age effect for disomies 1, 9, 18 and 21 and the sex chromosomes are in the literature, others failed to notice any association for these or other chromosomes. It is biologically plausible that chromosomal non-disjunction errors should increase with age. Male reproductive hormone production, testicular morphology and semen parameters all decline slowly with age and paternal age is implicated in congenital birth defects, such as achondroplasia and Apert syndromes and also linked to compromised DNA repair mechanisms. Despite several decades of epidemiological and molecular cytogenetic studies, however, we are still not close to a definitive answer of whether or not there is a paternal age effect for aneuploidy. In this review we conclude by questioning the efficacy of FISH because of difficulties in detecting nullisomy and because of evidence that the centromeres (from which most sperm-FISH probes are derived) cluster at the nuclear centre. Array-based approaches may well supersede FISH in addressing the question of a paternal age effect; for now, however, the jury is still out.
Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21212646     DOI: 10.1159/000322816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res        ISSN: 1424-8581            Impact factor:   1.636


  15 in total

1.  The effect of father's age in fertile, subfertile, and assisted reproductive technology pregnancies: a population based cohort study.

Authors:  Judy E Stern; Barbara Luke; Mark D Hornstein; Howard Cabral; Daksha Gopal; Hafsatou Diop; Milton Kotelchuck
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Evidence for paternal age-related alterations in meiotic chromosome dynamics in the mouse.

Authors:  Lisa A Vrooman; So I Nagaoka; Terry J Hassold; Patricia A Hunt
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Male biological clock: a critical analysis of advanced paternal age.

Authors:  Ranjith Ramasamy; Koji Chiba; Peter Butler; Dolores J Lamb
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Advanced paternal age does not affect embryo aneuploidy following blastocyst biopsy in egg donor cycles.

Authors:  Robert J Carrasquillo; Taylor P Kohn; Cengiz Cinnioglu; Carmen Rubio; Carlos Simon; Ranjith Ramasamy; Nasser Al-Asmar
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  Molecular basis of reproductive senescence: insights from model organisms.

Authors:  Cristina Quesada-Candela; Julia Loose; Arjumand Ghazi; Judith L Yanowitz
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.357

6.  Increasing live birth rate by preimplantation genetic screening of pooled polar bodies using array comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Michael Feichtinger; Tina Stopp; Christian Göbl; Elisabeth Feichtinger; Enrico Vaccari; Ulrike Mädel; Franco Laccone; Monika Stroh-Weigert; Markus Hengstschläger; Wilfried Feichtinger; Jürgen Neesen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Assessing the impact of semen quality on embryo development in an egg donation model.

Authors:  Lusine Aghajanova; Chia-Ning Kao; Marcelle Cedars; Nam Tran
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2020-11-11

8.  Disomy 21 in spermatozoa and the paternal origin of trisomy 21 Down syndrome.

Authors:  Erik Iwarsson; Ulrik Kvist; Maj A Hultén
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 9.  Impact of sperm DNA chromatin in the clinic.

Authors:  Dimitrios Ioannou; David Miller; Darren K Griffin; Helen G Tempest
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Evidence of Selection against Complex Mitotic-Origin Aneuploidy during Preimplantation Development.

Authors:  Rajiv C McCoy; Zachary P Demko; Allison Ryan; Milena Banjevic; Matthew Hill; Styrmir Sigurjonsson; Matthew Rabinowitz; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.