Literature DB >> 21212472

Bragg peak prediction from quantitative proton computed tomography using different path estimates.

Dongxu Wang1, T Rockwell Mackie, Wolfgang A Tomé.   

Abstract

This paper characterizes the performance of the straight-line path (SLP) and cubic spline path (CSP) as path estimates used in reconstruction of proton computed tomography (pCT). The GEANT4 Monte Carlo simulation toolkit is employed to simulate the imaging phantom and proton projections. SLP, CSP and the most-probable path (MPP) are constructed based on the entrance and exit information of each proton. The physical deviations of SLP, CSP and MPP from the real path are calculated. Using a conditional proton path probability map, the relative probability of SLP, CSP and MPP are calculated and compared. The depth dose and Bragg peak are predicted on the pCT images reconstructed using SLP, CSP, and MPP and compared with the simulation result. The root-mean-square physical deviations and the cumulative distribution of the physical deviations show that the performance of CSP is comparable to MPP while SLP is slightly inferior. About 90% of the SLP pixels and 99% of the CSP pixels lie in the 99% relative probability envelope of the MPP. Even at an imaging dose of ∼0.1 mGy the proton Bragg peak for a given incoming energy can be predicted on the pCT image reconstructed using SLP, CSP, or MPP with 1 mm accuracy. This study shows that SLP and CSP, like MPP, are adequate path estimates for pCT reconstruction, and therefore can be chosen as the path estimation method for pCT reconstruction, which can aid the treatment planning and range prediction of proton radiation therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21212472      PMCID: PMC4552339          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/3/005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  10 in total

1.  On the use of a proton path probability map for proton computed tomography reconstruction.

Authors:  Dongxu Wang; T Rockwell Mackie; Wolfgang A Tomé
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Density resolution of proton computed tomography.

Authors:  Reinhard W Schulte; Vladimir Bashkirov; Márgio C Loss Klock; Tianfang Li; Andrew J Wroe; Ivan Evseev; David C Williams; Todd Satogata
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Reconstruction for proton computed tomography by tracing proton trajectories: a Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  Tianfang Li; Zhengrong Liang; Jayalakshmi V Singanallur; Todd J Satogata; David C Williams; Reinhard W Schulte
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  A maximum likelihood proton path formalism for application in proton computed tomography.

Authors:  R W Schulte; S N Penfold; J T Tafas; K E Schubert
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  The calibration of CT Hounsfield units for radiotherapy treatment planning.

Authors:  U Schneider; E Pedroni; A Lomax
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  An analytical approximation of the Bragg curve for therapeutic proton beams.

Authors:  T Bortfeld
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Multiple Coulomb scattering and spatial resolution in proton radiography.

Authors:  U Schneider; E Pedroni
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  The relation between X-ray CT numbers and charged particle stopping powers and its significance for radiotherapy treatment planning.

Authors:  A A Mustafa; D F Jackson
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique (SART): a superior implementation of the art algorithm.

Authors:  A H Andersen; A C Kak
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 1.578

10.  The precision of proton range calculations in proton radiotherapy treatment planning: experimental verification of the relation between CT-HU and proton stopping power.

Authors:  B Schaffner; E Pedroni
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.609

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  200 MeV proton radiography studies with a hand phantom using a prototype proton CT scanner.

Authors:  Tia Plautz; V Bashkirov; V Feng; F Hurley; R P Johnson; C Leary; S Macafee; A Plumb; V Rykalin; H F-W Sadrozinski; K Schubert; R Schulte; B Schultze; D Steinberg; M Witt; A Zatserklyaniy
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Comprehensive analysis of proton range uncertainties related to patient stopping-power-ratio estimation using the stoichiometric calibration.

Authors:  Ming Yang; X Ronald Zhu; Peter C Park; Uwe Titt; Radhe Mohan; Gary Virshup; James E Clayton; Lei Dong
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  Proton radiography and tomography with application to proton therapy.

Authors:  G Poludniowski; N M Allinson; P M Evans
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  An inhomogeneous most likely path formalism for proton computed tomography.

Authors:  Mark D Brooke; Scott N Penfold
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 2.685

5.  Basics of particle therapy I: physics.

Authors:  Seo Hyun Park; Jin Oh Kang
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2011-09-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.