Literature DB >> 21212335

National Science Foundation. Meeting for peer review at a resort that's virtually free.

John Bohannon.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2011        PMID： 21212335     DOI： 10.1126/science.331.6013.27

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN： 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  Face-to-face panel meetings versus remote evaluation of fellowship applications: simulation study at the Swiss National Science Foundation.

Authors:  Marco Bieri; Katharina Roser; Rachel Heyard; Matthias Egger
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Teleconference versus face-to-face scientific peer review of grant application: effects on review outcomes.

Authors:  Stephen A Gallo; Afton S Carpenter; Scott R Glisson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences?

Authors:  Susan Guthrie; Ioana Ghiga; Steven Wooding
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-08-07

4.  What makes an effective grants peer reviewer? An exploratory study of the necessary skills.

Authors:  Miriam L E Steiner Davis; Tiffani R Conner; Kate Miller-Bains; Leslie Shapard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.