Literature DB >> 21212306

Infections and patellar tendon ruptures after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of ipsilateral and contralateral patellar tendon autografts.

Rodney W Benner1, K Donald Shelbourne, Heather Freeman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No studies document the incidence or results of infections and patellar tendon ruptures after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a contralateral patellar tendon autograft.
PURPOSE: To determine the results of patients who have infections and patellar tendon ruptures after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a patellar tendon autograft and compare the results between ipsilateral and contralateral grafts. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS: The authors determined the incidence of infections requiring surgical intervention and complete patellar tendon ruptures after surgery. Data were analyzed in 2 groups based on the graft source: ipsilateral (n = 2553) or contralateral (n = 2811). Data reviewed included range of motion, quadriceps strength, and subjective evaluations.
RESULTS: Infections occurred in 9 ipsilateral patients (0.35%) and 4 contralateral patients (0.14%) (P = .12). At final follow-up, less than normal knee extension was found in 4 ipsilateral patients and 1 contralateral patient; less than normal flexion was found in 4 ipsilateral patients and 2 contralateral patients. Patellar tendon ruptures occurred in 6 ipsilateral patients (0.24%) and 7 contralateral patients (0.25%) (P = .92). At 1 month after patellar tendon repair, mean motion (degree of hyperextension-degree short of 0° extension-degree of flexion) in the contralateral group was 5-0-137 in the reconstructed knee and 5-0-118 in the graft-donor knee, which was greater than 5-0-98 found in the ipsilateral group for the reconstructed knee (P < .05). The mean Noyes subjective score at a mean of 4 years postoperatively for the tendon-ruptured knee was 87 points in the ipsilateral group and 93 points in the contralateral group (P = .32), which is comparable with the published normative data for the Noyes score reporting a mean score of 93.6 ± 8.3 points.
CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in the incidence of infection or patellar tendon rupture between the ipsilateral and contralateral groups. Patients with complications after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a patellar tendon autograft may have less difficulty obtaining full knee motion when the graft is harvested from the contralateral knee.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21212306     DOI: 10.1177/0363546510388163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  10 in total

1.  [Management algorithm for septic arthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].

Authors:  C Wang; L Y Meng; N Y Chen; D Li; J Q Wang; Y F Ao
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2021-10-18

2.  Painful knee arthroplasty: current practice.

Authors:  Umberto Cottino; Federica Rosso; Antonio Pastrone; Federico Dettoni; Roberto Rossi; Matteo Bruzzone
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-12

Review 3.  Recommendations for the management of septic arthritis after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Cheng Wang; Yee Han Dave Lee; Rainer Siebold
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  The rate of subsequent surgery and predictors after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: two- and 6-year follow-up results from a multicenter cohort.

Authors:  Carolyn M Hettrich; Warren R Dunn; Emily K Reinke; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Can additional information be obtained from claims data to support surgical site infection diagnosis codes?

Authors:  David K Warren; Katelin B Nickel; Anna E Wallace; Daniel Mines; Victoria J Fraser; Margaret A Olsen
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 6.  CONTRALATERAL PATELLAR TENDON AUTOGRAFT IN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION.

Authors:  Paulo Lobo; Eugênio Dos Santos; José Humberto DE Souza Borges; Luana Junqueira Resende Volpe Dias; Ronny DE Souza Machado; Anderson Freitas
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.513

7.  Hamstring Tendon Autograft Contamination in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison between two Harvesting Techniques.

Authors:  Eduardo Frois Temponi; Luís Henrique Grassi Marques da Costa; Luiz Fernando Machado Soares; Lúcio Honório de Carvalho Júnior
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-03-01

Review 8.  Optimal Graft Choice in Athletic Patients with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: Review and Clinical Insights.

Authors:  Katarina Sim; Richard Rahardja; Mark Zhu; Simon W Young
Journal:  Open Access J Sports Med       Date:  2022-07-01

9.  Septic Arthritis After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Clinical and Functional Outcomes Based on Graft Retention or Removal.

Authors:  Brian R Waterman; William Arroyo; Eric J Cotter; Michael A Zacchilli; E'Stephan J Garcia; Brett D Owens
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-03-01

10.  Patellar Tendon Reconstruction Using Semitendinosus Autograft With Preserved Distal Insertion for Treatment of Patellar Tendon Rupture After Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone ACL Reconstruction: A Case Report.

Authors:  John P Haskoor; Brian D Busconi
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-10-16
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.