Literature DB >> 21212067

Genome-based prediction of breast cancer risk in the general population: a modeling study based on meta-analyses of genetic associations.

Moniek van Zitteren1, Jeroen B van der Net, Suman Kundu, Andrew N Freedman, Cornelia M van Duijn, A Cecile J W Janssens.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Genome-wide association studies identified novel breast cancer susceptibility variants that could be used to predict breast cancer in asymptomatic women. This review and modeling study aimed to investigate the current and potential predictive performance of genetic risk models.
METHODS: Genotypes and disease status were simulated for a population of 10,000 women. Genetic risk models were constructed from polymorphisms from meta-analysis including, in separate scenarios, all polymorphisms or statistically significant polymorphisms only. We additionally investigated the magnitude of the odds ratios (OR) for 1 to 100 hypothetical polymorphisms that would be needed to achieve similar discriminative accuracy as available prediction models [modeled range of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.70-0.80].
RESULTS: Of the 96 polymorphisms that had been investigated in meta-analyses, 41 showed significant associations. AUC was 0.68 for the genetic risk model based on all 96 polymorphisms and 0.67 for the 41 significant polymorphisms. Addition of 50 additional variants, each with risk allele frequencies of 0.30, requires per-allele ORs of 1.2 to increase this AUC to 0.70, 1.3 to increase AUC to 0.75, and 1.5 to increase AUC to 0.80. To achieve AUC of 0.80, even 100 additional variants would need per-allele ORs of 1.3 to 1.7, depending on risk allele frequencies.
CONCLUSION: The predictive ability of genetic risk models in breast cancer has the potential to become comparable to that of current breast cancer risk models. IMPACT: Risk prediction based on low susceptibility variants becomes a realistic tool in prevention of nonfamilial breast cancer. ©2011 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21212067     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  19 in total

1.  The role of polycomb group protein Bmi-1 and Notch4 in breast cancer stem cell inhibition by benzyl isothiocyanate.

Authors:  Su-Hyeong Kim; Shivendra V Singh
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-02-08       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Targeting RLIP with CRISPR/Cas9 controls tumor growth.

Authors:  Jyotsana Singhal; Shireen Chikara; David Horne; Sanjay Awasthi; Ravi Salgia; Sharad S Singhal
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 4.944

3.  The more from East-Asian, the better: risk prediction of colorectal cancer risk by GWAS-identified SNPs among Japanese.

Authors:  Makiko Abe; Hidemi Ito; Isao Oze; Masatoshi Nomura; Yoshihiro Ogawa; Keitaro Matsuo
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Prediction of breast cancer risk using a machine learning approach embedded with a locality preserving projection algorithm.

Authors:  Morteza Heidari; Abolfazl Zargari Khuzani; Alan B Hollingsworth; Gopichandh Danala; Seyedehnafiseh Mirniaharikandehei; Yuchen Qiu; Hong Liu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Suppression of FOXQ1 in benzyl isothiocyanate-mediated inhibition of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in human breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Anuradha Sehrawat; Su-Hyeong Kim; Andreas Vogt; Shivendra V Singh
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2012-12-30       Impact factor: 4.944

6.  Prevention of breast cancer-induced osteolytic bone resorption by benzyl isothiocyanate.

Authors:  Subrata K Pore; Eun-Ryeong Hahm; Joseph D Latoche; Carolyn J Anderson; Yongli Shuai; Shivendra V Singh
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.944

7.  Predicting the future of genetic risk prediction.

Authors:  Nilanjan Chatterjee; Ju-Hyun Park; Neil Caporaso; Mitchell H Gail
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Notch2 activation is protective against anticancer effects of zerumbone in human breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Anuradha Sehrawat; Kozue Sakao; Shivendra V Singh
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-07-20       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Cancer-selective death of human breast cancer cells by leelamine is mediated by bax and bak activation.

Authors:  Anuradha Sehrawat; Su-Hyeong Kim; Eun-Ryeong Hahm; Julie A Arlotti; Julie Eiseman; Sruti S Shiva; Lora H Rigatti; Shivendra V Singh
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 4.784

10.  Potential usefulness of single nucleotide polymorphisms to identify persons at high cancer risk: an evaluation of seven common cancers.

Authors:  Ju-Hyun Park; Mitchell H Gail; Mark H Greene; Nilanjan Chatterjee
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.