Literature DB >> 21212053

Two decades after legislation on identifiable donors in Sweden: are recipient couples ready to be open about using gamete donation?

S Isaksson1, A Skoog Svanberg, G Sydsjö, A Thurin-Kjellberg, P-O Karlström, N-G Solensten, C Lampic.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND Two decades after the introduction of Swedish legislation that allows children born as a result of gamete donation access to identifying information about the donor, a nationwide multicentre study on the psychosocial consequences of this legislation for recipients and donors of gametes was initiated in 2005. The aim of the present study was to investigate recipient couples' attitudes and behaviour regarding disclosure to offspring and others, attitudes towards genetic parenthood and perceptions of information regarding parenthood after donation. METHODS The present study is part of the prospective longitudinal 'Swedish study on gamete donation', including all fertility clinics performing donation treatment in Sweden. A consecutive cohort of 152 heterosexual recipient couples of donated oocytes (72% response) and 127 heterosexual recipient couples of donated sperm (81% response) accepted participation in the study. In connection with the donation treatment, male and female participants individually completed two questionnaires with study-specific instruments concerning disclosure, genetic parenthood and informational aspects. RESULTS About 90% of participants (in couples receiving anonymous donated gametes) supported disclosure and openness to the offspring concerning his/her genetic origin. Only 6% of all participants had not told other people about their donation treatment. Between 26 and 40% of participants wanted additional information/support about parenthood following donation treatment. CONCLUSIONS Two decades after the Swedish legislation of identifiable gamete donors, recipient couples of anonymously donated sperm and oocytes are relatively open about their treatment and support disclosure to offspring. Recipient couples may benefit from more information and support regarding parenthood after gamete donation. Further studies are required to follow-up on the future parents' actual disclosure behaviour directed to offspring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21212053     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  18 in total

1.  Exploring Motivations, Awareness of Side Effects, and Attitudes among Potential Egg Donors.

Authors:  Lindsay B Gezinski; Sharvari Karandikar; James Carter; Melinda White
Journal:  Health Soc Work       Date:  2016-05

Review 2.  Counselling on disclosure of gamete donation to donor offspring:a search for facts.

Authors:  M Visser; P A L Kop; M van Wely; F van der Veen; G J E Gerrits; M C B van Zwieten
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2012

3.  Proposed legislative change mandating retrospective release of identifying information: consultation with donors and Government response.

Authors:  Karin Hammarberg; Louise Johnson; Kate Bourne; Jane Fisher; Maggie Kirkman
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Disclosure behaviour and intentions among 111 couples following treatment with oocytes or sperm from identity-release donors: follow-up at offspring age 1-4 years.

Authors:  S Isaksson; G Sydsjö; A Skoog Svanberg; C Lampic
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Attitudes towards disclosure and relationship to donor offspring among a national cohort of identity-release oocyte and sperm donors.

Authors:  C Lampic; A Skoog Svanberg; G Sydsjö
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Relationships in couples treated with sperm donation - a national prospective follow-up study.

Authors:  Gunilla Sydsjö; Agneta Skoog Svanberg; Marie Bladh; Claudia Lampic
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 3.223

7.  It takes two to tango: information-sharing with offspring among heterosexual parents following identity-release sperm donation.

Authors:  S Isaksson; A Skoog-Svanberg; G Sydsjö; L Linell; C Lampic
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Development of A Questionnaire to Measure Attitude toward Oocyte Donation.

Authors:  Reza Omani Samani; Leila Mounesan; Zahra Ezabadi; Samira Vesali
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-10-31

9.  Ethical Challenges of Embryo Donation in Embryo Donors and Recipients.

Authors:  Mahboubeh Taebi; Reyhane Bahrami; Narges Bagheri-Lankarani; Mohsen Shahriari
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb

10.  Parenting stress and its association with perceived agreement about the disclosure decision in parents following donor conception.

Authors:  Anja J Gebhardt; Gunilla Sydsjö; Agneta Skoog Svanberg; Astrid Indekeu; Claudia Lampic
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 3.636

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.