Literature DB >> 21211931

Initial clinical experience with a sac-anchoring endoprosthesis for aortic aneurysm repair.

Carlos E Donayre1, Christopher K Zarins, Dainis K Krievins, Andrew Holden, Andrew Hill, Carlos Calderas, Jaime Velez, Rodney A White.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: All current aortic endografts depend on proximal and distal fixation to prevent migration. However, migration and rupture can occur, particularly in patients with aortic necks that are short or angulated, or both. We present our initial clinical experience with a new sac-anchoring endoprosthesis designed to anchor and seal the device within the aneurysm sac.
METHODS: The initial worldwide experience using a new endoprosthesis for the treatment of aortic aneurysms (Nellix Endovascular, Palo Alto, Calif) was reviewed. The endoprosthesis consists of dual balloon-expandable endoframes surrounded by polymer-filled endobags designed to obliterate the aneurysm sac and maintain endograft position. Clinical results and follow-up contrast computed tomography (CT) scans at 30 days and 6 and 12 months were reviewed.
RESULTS: The endograft was successfully deployed in 21 patients with infrarenal aortic aneurysms measuring 5.7 ± 0.7 cm (range, 4.3-7.4 cm). Two patients with common iliac aneurysms were treated with sac-anchoring extenders that maintained patency of the internal iliac artery. Infusion of 71 ± 37 mL of polymer (range, 19-158 mL) into the aortic endobags resulted in complete aneurysm exclusion in all patients. Mean implant time was 76 ± 35 minutes, with 33 ± 17 minutes of fluoroscopy time and 180 ± 81 mL of contrast; estimated blood loss was 174 ± 116 mL. One patient died during the postoperative period (30-day mortality, 4.8%), and one died at 10 months from non-device-related causes. During a mean follow-up of 8.7 ± 3.1 months and a median of 6.3 months, there were no late aneurysm- or device-related adverse events and no secondary procedures. CT imaging studies at 6 months and 1 year revealed no increase in aneurysm size, no device migration, and no new endoleaks. One patient had a limited proximal type I endoleak at 30 days that resolved at 60 days and remained sealed. One patient has an ongoing distal type I endoleak near the iliac bifurcation, with no change in aneurysm size at 12 months.
CONCLUSION: Initial clinical experience with this novel intrasac anchoring prosthesis is promising, with successful aneurysm exclusion and good short-term results. This new device platform has the potential to address the anatomic restrictions and limitations of current endografts. Further studies with a longer follow-up time are needed.
Copyright © 2011 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21211931     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  10 in total

Review 1.  Current treatment strategies for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Andreas S Peters; Maani Hakimi; Philipp Erhart; Michael Keese; Thomas Schmitz-Rixen; Markus Wortmann; Moritz S Bischoff; Dittmar Böckler
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Chimney Technique with Nellix EndoVascular Aneurysm Sealing System in a Patient with Single Kidney and Juxtarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

Authors:  Kaspars Kisis; Janis Savlovskis; Marcis Gedins; Natalija Ezite; Edgars Zellans; Dainis Krievins
Journal:  Aorta (Stamford)       Date:  2016-08-01

Review 3.  Endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Dominique B Buck; Joost A van Herwaarden; Marc L Schermerhorn; Frans L Moll
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  Endovascular aneurysm sealing for the treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Jorg L de Bruin; Jack R W Brownrigg; Alan Karthikesalingam; Benjamin O Patterson; Peter J E Holt; Robert J Hinchliffe; Robert A Morgan; Ian M Loftus; Matthew M Thompson
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 3.487

5.  Two-Year Outcomes of the Nellix EndoVascular Aneurysm Sealing System for Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Authors:  Aleksandra C Zoethout; Johannes T Boersen; Jan M M Heyligers; Jean-Paul P M de Vries; Clark J A M Zeebregts; Michel M P J Reijnen
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 3.487

Review 6.  The Nellix endovascular aneurysm sealing system: current perspectives.

Authors:  Xin Y Choo; Shahab Hajibandeh; Shahin Hajibandeh; George A Antoniou
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2019-02-19

7.  Degradation Phenomena on "Homemade" Explanted Aortic Textile Endografts.

Authors:  Sheng-Heng Cao; Jennifer Canonge; Julien Gaudric; Delphine Dion; Salomé Kuntz; Jérémie Jayet; Fabien Koskas; Frédéric Heim; Anne Lejay; Nabil Chakfé
Journal:  EJVES Vasc Forum       Date:  2021-08-03

8.  Systematic Review on the Mid-Term Outcomes of Elective Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing in Comparison to Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

Authors:  Aleksandra C Zoethout; Iris Hochstenbach; Maarten J van der Laan; Jean-Paul P M de Vries; Michel M P J Reijnen; Clark J Zeebregts
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 3.089

9.  Late failure of a Nellix endoprosthesis treated with the t-Branch off-the-shelf multibranched stent graft.

Authors:  Antonio Lorido; Matteo Orrico; Mario Marino; Alessio Vona; Sonia Ronchey; Nicola Mangialardi
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech       Date:  2019-11-22

10.  Stabilization of the Abdominal Aorta During the Cardiac Cycle with the Sac-Anchoring Nellix Device.

Authors:  Nathan K Itoga; Ga-Young Suh; Christopher P Cheng
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2018-06-09       Impact factor: 1.466

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.