Literature DB >> 21211899

Impact of 5α-reductase inhibitors on men followed by active surveillance for prostate cancer.

Antonio Finelli1, Greg Trottier, Nathan Lawrentschuk, Robert Sowerby, Alexandre R Zlotta, Lenny Radomski, Narhari Timilshina, Andrew Evans, Theodorus H van der Kwast, Ants Toi, Micheal A S Jewett, John Trachtenberg, Neil E Fleshner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In two large randomized controlled trials, 5α-reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) were shown to prevent prostate cancer. No prior work had shown the effect of 5-ARIs on those already diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer.
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine the effect of 5-ARIs on pathologic progression in men on active surveillance. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a single-institution retrospective cohort study comparing men taking a 5-ARI versus no 5-ARI while on active surveillance for prostate cancer. MEASUREMENTS: Pathologic progression was evaluated and defined as Gleason score >6, maximum core involvement >50%, or more than three cores positive on a follow-up prostate biopsy. Kaplan-Meier analyses were conducted along with multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression modeling for predictors of pathologic progression. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 288 men on active surveillance met the inclusion criteria. The median follow-up was 38.5 mo (interquartile range: 23.6-59.4) with 93 men (32%) experiencing pathologic progression and 96 men (33%) abandoning active surveillance. Men taking a 5-ARI experienced a lower rate of pathologic progression (18.6% vs 36.7%; p=0.004) and were less likely to abandon active surveillance (20% vs 37.6%; p=0.006). On multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, lack of 5-ARI use was most strongly associated with pathologic progression (hazard ratio: 2.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-5.6). The main study limitation was the retrospective design and variable duration of 5-ARI therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: The 5-ARIs were associated with a significantly lower rate of pathologic progression and abandonment of active surveillance. Crown
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21211899     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.12.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  13 in total

Review 1.  Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: an update.

Authors:  Nathan Lawrentschuk; Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Could the use of 5α-reductase inhibitors during active surveillance reduce the risk of disease progression?

Authors:  Nick Warde
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  5-alpha reductase inhibitors in patients on active surveillance: do the benefits outweigh the risk?

Authors:  Ghazi Al Edwan; Neil Fleshner
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Active surveillance in patients with a PSA >10 ng/mL.

Authors:  Paul Toren; Lih-Ming Wong; Narhari Timilshina; Shabbir Alibhai; John Trachtenberg; Neil Fleshner; Antonio Finelli
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Co-clinical Analysis of a Genetically Engineered Mouse Model and Human Prostate Cancer Reveals Significance of NKX3.1 Expression for Response to 5α-reductase Inhibition.

Authors:  Aditya Dutta; Sukanya Panja; Renu K Virk; Jaime Yeji Kim; Roseann Zott; Serge Cremers; David M Golombos; Deli Liu; Juan Miguel Mosquera; Elahe A Mostaghel; Christopher E Barbieri; Antonina Mitrofanova; Cory Abate-Shen
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Active surveillance for the management of localized prostate cancer: Guideline recommendations.

Authors:  Chris Morash; Rovena Tey; Chika Agbassi; Laurence Klotz; Tom McGowan; John Srigley; Andrew Evans
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  5α-Reductase inhibitors and risk of high-grade or lethal prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mark A Preston; Kathryn M Wilson; Sarah C Markt; Rongbin Ge; Christopher Morash; Meir J Stampfer; Massimo Loda; Edward Giovannucci; Lorelei A Mucci; Aria F Olumi
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 8.  The Study of Active Monitoring in Sweden (SAMS): a randomized study comparing two different follow-up schedules for active surveillance of low-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ola Bratt; Stefan Carlsson; Erik Holmberg; Lars Holmberg; Eva Johansson; Andreas Josefsson; Annika Nilsson; Maria Nyberg; David Robinsson; Jonas Sandberg; Dag Sandblom; Pär Stattin
Journal:  Scand J Urol       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 1.612

9.  The Relationship Between Metformin and Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels.

Authors:  Viranda H Jayalath; Christopher Ireland; Neil E Fleshner; Robert J Hamilton; David J A Jenkins
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.104

10.  Prognostic influence of 5 alpha reductase inhibitors in patients with localized prostate cancer under active surveillance.

Authors:  Tayyar Alp Özkan; Oğuz Özden Cebeci; İbrahim Çevik; Özdal Dillioğlugil
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2018-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.