Literature DB >> 21211759

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® on chest pain, suggestive of acute coronary syndrome.

Leena Mammen1, Richard D White, Pamela K Woodard, J Jeffrey Carr, James P Earls, Robert C Hendel, Vincent B Ho, Udo Hoffman, Thomas Ryan, U Joseph Schoepf, Charles S White.   

Abstract

Acute chest pain suggestive of acute coronary syndrome is a frequent complaint in the emergency department. Acute coronary syndromes include myocardial infarction and unstable angina. Being able to establish the diagnosis rapidly and accurately may be lifesaving. A cardiac workup is indicated in this subset of patients in the acute setting, even if there are no ischemic changes on electrocardiography. If the clinical examination and initial cardiac workup suggest that a patient is having myocardial ischemia, the patient will usually be urgently referred for invasive coronary angiography and revascularization. In stable patients without evidence of ST elevation and ongoing myocardial ischemia, an initially conservative approach is sometimes considered. Cardiac risk stratification of this subgroup of patients who are at low and intermediate risk for coronary artery disease is recommended before discharge, and imaging is necessary to exclude ischemia as an etiology. Noninvasive cardiac imaging modalities include chest radiography, single photon-emission CT myocardial perfusion imaging, echocardiography, multidetector CT, PET, and MRI. Noncardiac etiologies of chest pain include aortic dissection, aortic aneurysm, pulmonary embolism, pericardial disease, and lung parenchymal disease. Noninvasive cardiac imaging in patients who are at low and intermediate risk for coronary artery disease may improve confidence regarding the safety of discharge from the emergency department. In addition to risk stratification, noncoronary etiologies for chest pain can be established with imaging.
Copyright © 2011 American College of Radiology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21211759     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2010.08.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  3 in total

1.  Comparing two methods for determining appropriateness of myocardial perfusion imaging: Criteria from the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American College of Radiology.

Authors:  Anastasiya Bagrova; Ali Y Alsamarah; David E Winchester
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance-observation unit management of patients at intermediate risk for acute coronary syndrome: a possible strategy for reducing healthcare-related costs.

Authors:  Michael E Hall; Chadwick D Miller; W Gregory Hundley
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2012-02

Review 3.  Coronary computed tomography angiography for the assessment of chest pain: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Arthur Nasis; Ian T Meredith; James D Cameron; Sujith K Seneviratne
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 2.357

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.