| Literature DB >> 21210965 |
Ulises Urzúa1, Garrison A Owens, Gen-Mu Zhang, James M Cherry, John J Sharp, David J Munroe.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The link between reproductive life history and incidence of ovarian tumors is well known. Periods of reduced ovulations may confer protection against ovarian cancer. Using phenotypic data available for mouse, a possible association between the ovarian transcriptome, reproductive records and spontaneous ovarian tumor rates was investigated in four mouse inbred strains. NIA15k-DNA microarrays were employed to obtain expression profiles of BalbC, C57BL6, FVB and SWR adult ovaries.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21210965 PMCID: PMC3045792 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-S5-S1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Figure 1Consistency of microarray results and Q-PCR confirmation of selected genes Normalized microarray data of 5 cDNA clones of Tsc22 (A), 4 clones of Col3a1 (B) and 4 clones of Fubp1 (C) were compared between samples s1 and s2 (corresponding to 2 of the 4 mouse ovarian samples assayed) across 6 microarray replicates each. Adjusted p-values and expression change (ec), defined as the difference between log2 averages are shown. In D, the coordinates of scatter plot depicts the average of normalized microarray ratios (5-6 replicates) and the average of duplicate Q-PCR assays for the genes Spp1, Txnrd1, Anxa5, Fn1, C1s, Ctsl, and Mt1 in each of the 4 mouse strains. The internal control transcript was the 18S rRNA. Q-PCR data was converted to log2 scale ratios as described in Methods. The squared correlation coefficient (R2) shown corresponds to the overall gene subset in the 4 strains (i.e. 28 data pairs). Raw Q-PCR results and individual microarray ratios are detailed in Additional file1, table 1.
Ovarian tumor and reproductive phenotypes in selected mouse strains
| Strain | Tumor frequency | Litter size | Number of litters | Productive matings (%) | Relative fecundity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BALB/c | 3.80 | 4.9 | 3.6 | 55.6 | 9.80 |
| C57BL/6 | 1.60 | 6.6 | 3.8 | 87.4 | 21.9 |
| FVB | 7.00 | 9.5 | 4.8 | 90.0 | 41.0 |
| SWR | 57.0 | 7.5 | 2.3 | 58.3 | 10.1 |
Refers to spontaneously arisen tumors in inbred mice. Data corresponds to the “highest reported tumor frequency” in all literature records collected in the Mouse Tumor Biology Database [9], (http://tumor.informatics.jax.org/mtbwi/dynamicGrid.do;jessession=89370725979E9B939D3DD40AB4961BA5) for each strain/organ combination where organ=ovary.
Litter size, number of litters, and productive matings were taken from the Mouse Phenome Database [8] (http://www.jax.org/phenome). Data acquisition, curation and handling are described at http://phenome.jax.org/db/q?rtn=docs/aboutmpd. The parameter “relative fecundity” is derived form the other 3 reproductive parameters [5].
Data of FVB strain was taken from Silver’s Mouse Genetics textbook [5].
Summary of correlation results between ovarian gene expression and phenotypes
| Trait | Correlated clones | Trait interactions | Direction and strength of correlation (R value range) | Gene expression shift (δ log2 value range) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTF | NL | LS | RF | Positive | Negative | Positive | Negative | ||
| Ovarian tumor frequency (OTF) | 425 (280) | - | 145 | 0 | 0 | 97 (1.00-0.51) | 328 (1.00-0.52) | 3.26 - 0.19 | 2.96 - 0.21 |
| Number of litters (NL) | 234 (82) | 145 | - | 0 | 7 | 161 (1.00-0.73) | 72 (0.99-0.67) | 2.94 - 0.32 | 3.00 - 0.24 |
| Litter size (LS) | 73 (66) | 0 | 0 | - | 7 | 53 (0.99-0.78) | 20 (0.99-0.62) | 2.50 - 0.32 | 2.18 - 0.41 |
| Relative fecundity (RF) | 17 (3) | 0 | 7 | 7 | - | 12 (0.98-0.78) | 5 (0.98-0.90) | 1.50 - 0.29 | 0.85 - 0.51 |
Number of clones resulting from a regression analysis with false discovery rate (FDR) control performed with the multiple test tool Pomelo (accessible at http://pomelo2.bioinfo.cnio.es/). For each trait, genes were filtered with an adjusted p<0.05 resulting in a total of 590 unique arrayed clones showing statistically significant correlation. Under this criterion, the trait “productive matings” did not show correlation. The number of clones exclusively correlated with the indicated trait is shown between parentheses.
Interactions correspond to the number of clones correlated with two or more traits as obtained with Boolean comparisons.
Pearson correlation coefficients (R) were calculated using gene expression log2 ratios as independent variable and each of phenotypic trait (see Table 1) as dependent variables. The observed range of R values for all correlated genes is shown between parentheses.
Gene expression ratios (log2) for the extreme trait values were subtracted (δ) and then ranked. The highest and the lowest ratio difference are shown between parentheses.
Figure 2Strength of OTF correlation as a function of ovarian gene expression shift The squared correlation coefficient (R2) for the 425 clones positively and negatively correlated (adjusted p<0.05) with ovarian tumor frequency (OTF) were plotted against their respective gene expression shifts. The shift is defined as the resultant of the subtracted gene expression log2 ratios between extreme values (see Table 1 and Additional file 1, 2, 3 Results file).
Figure 3Ovarian gene expression correlated to OTF and NL The gene expression ratios of the top-20 OTF(-), NL(+) best correlated clones (A) and the top-10 OTF(+), NL(-) best correlated clones (B) are plotted against their respective phenotypic variables. The average of squared correlation coefficients and four representative tendency lines are shown in each plot. Insets show hierarchical clusters for genes (vertical trees) and samples (horizontal trees). Yellow clusters represent negative correlation and blue clusters represent positive correlation. Color scales and Unigene IDs are shown at the bottom and right side of each cluster, respectively. Unknown clones appear with the NIA-15K clone code.