BACKGROUND: Despite increasing availability of three-dimensional imaging modalities for estimating right ventricular (RV) size, linear and two-dimensional measures of RV size are the most universally accessible clinical methods. Right ventricular end-diastolic area (RVED area) is known to identify pulmonary pathologies and have prognostic value for cardiovascular mortality in various disease states. To date, there is a paucity of adequately powered studies to define gender- and ethnicity-related differences in normal RVED area. Therefore, we derived gender-based normative values for echocardiographic measurements of RVED area, in a large bi-racial cohort of young adults. METHODS: Healthy young adults participants (n = 2088) in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study, aged 23-35 years, at the time of echocardiogram, were evaluated. RVED area was stratified according to gender and race. The contributions of clinical, allometric and left heart morphology and function to the variability in RVED area were determined. RESULTS: RVED area in males was significantly larger than in females of similar age, but whites had similar values compared to same-gender blacks. RVED area for men and women of >24.7 cm(2) and 20.7cm(2) , or RVED area indexed to BSA (cm(2) /m(2) ) of >12.6 and >11.7, respectively, are at the 97.5th percentile of normal values. RVED area correlated significantly with left ventricular volume and left atrial size. Lung capacity measured as FVC showed significant body size adjusted correlation with RVED area only in black males. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides normative values for echocardiographically defined RV end-diastolic area, and highlights the necessity to use gender-specific normative values.
BACKGROUND: Despite increasing availability of three-dimensional imaging modalities for estimating right ventricular (RV) size, linear and two-dimensional measures of RV size are the most universally accessible clinical methods. Right ventricular end-diastolic area (RVED area) is known to identify pulmonary pathologies and have prognostic value for cardiovascular mortality in various disease states. To date, there is a paucity of adequately powered studies to define gender- and ethnicity-related differences in normal RVED area. Therefore, we derived gender-based normative values for echocardiographic measurements of RVED area, in a large bi-racial cohort of young adults. METHODS: Healthy young adults participants (n = 2088) in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study, aged 23-35 years, at the time of echocardiogram, were evaluated. RVED area was stratified according to gender and race. The contributions of clinical, allometric and left heart morphology and function to the variability in RVED area were determined. RESULTS: RVED area in males was significantly larger than in females of similar age, but whites had similar values compared to same-gender blacks. RVED area for men and women of >24.7 cm(2) and 20.7cm(2) , or RVED area indexed to BSA (cm(2) /m(2) ) of >12.6 and >11.7, respectively, are at the 97.5th percentile of normal values. RVED area correlated significantly with left ventricular volume and left atrial size. Lung capacity measured as FVC showed significant body size adjusted correlation with RVED area only in black males. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides normative values for echocardiographically defined RV end-diastolic area, and highlights the necessity to use gender-specific normative values.
Authors: W Hui; M Y Abd El Rahman; F Dsebissowa; M Gutberlet; V Alexi-Meskishvili; R Hetzer; P E Lange; H Abdul-Khaliq Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2005-12-07 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: G de Simone; S R Daniels; R B Devereux; R A Meyer; M J Roman; O de Divitiis; M H Alderman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1992-11-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Michael T Lu; Tianxi Cai; Hale Ersoy; Amanda G Whitmore; Rene Quiroz; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Frank J Rybicki Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: J M Gardin; N D Wong; W Bommer; H S Klopfenstein; V E Smith; B Tabatznik; D Siscovick; S Lobodzinski; H Anton-Culver; T A Manolio Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 1992 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: A Kitabatake; M Inoue; M Asao; T Masuyama; J Tanouchi; T Morita; M Mishima; M Uematsu; T Shimazu; M Hori; H Abe Journal: Circulation Date: 1983-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Vinzenz Hombach; Nico Merkle; Jan Torzewski; Johann M Kraus; Markus Kunze; Oliver Zimmermann; Hans A Kestler; Jochen Wöhrle Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2009-07-24 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Diana Bonderman; Ingrid Pretsch; Regina Steringer-Mascherbauer; Pavel Jansa; Stephan Rosenkranz; Caroline Tufaro; Andja Bojic; Carolyn S P Lam; Reiner Frey; Michael Ochan Kilama; Sigrun Unger; Lothar Roessig; Irene M Lang Journal: Chest Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Faisal Rahman; Na Wang; Xiaoyan Yin; Patrick T Ellinor; Steven A Lubitz; Paul A LeLorier; David D McManus; Lisa M Sullivan; Sudha Seshadri; Ramachandran S Vasan; Emelia J Benjamin; Jared W Magnani Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2015-07-28 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Cora E Lewis; Pamela J Schreiner; James M Shikany; Stephen Sidney; Jared P Reis Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2021-07-20 Impact factor: 27.203