Literature DB >> 212105

Mode of coupling between the beta-adrenergic receptor and adenylate cyclase in turkey erythrocytes.

A M Tolkovsky, A Levitzki.   

Abstract

The mode of coupling of the beta-adrenergic receptor to the enzyme adenylate cyclase in turkey erythrocyte membranes was analyzed in detail. A number of experimental techniques have been used: (1) measurement of the kinetics of cyclase activation to its permanetly active state in the presence of guanylyl imidodiphosphate, as a function of hormone concentrations; (2) measurement of antagonist and agoinst binding to the beta-adrenergic receptor prior and subsequent to the enzyme activation by hormone and guanylyl imidodiphosphate. On the bases of these two approaches, all the models of receptor to enzyme coupling which involve an equilibrium between the enzyme and the receptor can be rejected. The binding and the kinetic data, however, can be fitted by two diametrically opposed models of receptor to enzyme coupling: (a) the precouped enzyme-receptor model where activation of the enzyme occurs, according to the following scheme: formula (see text) where H is the hormone, RE is the precoupled respetor-enzyme complex, k1 and k2 are the rate constants describing hormone binding, and k is the rate constant characterizing the formation of HRE' from the intermediate HRE. According to this model, the activated complex is composed of all of the interacting species. (b) The other model is the collision coupling mechanism: formula (see test) wheere KH is the horome-receptor dissociation constant, k1 is the bimolecular rate constant governing the formation of HRE, and k3 the rate constant governing the activation of the enzyme. In this case the intermediate never accumulates and constitutes only a small fraction of the total receptor and adenylate cyclase concentrations. In order to establish which of the two mechanisms governs the mode of adenylate cyclase activation by its receptor, a diagnostic experiment was performed: Progressive inactivation of the beta receptor by a specific affinity label was found to cause a decrease in the maximal binding capacity of the receptor and a proportional decrease in the rate of activation, but no change in the maximum level of activity was attained. Progressive inactivation of the enzyme by p-hydroxymercuribenzoate was found not to change the rate of activation nor the capacity of the receptor to bind hormone. Only the maximal level of activation was found to be decreased. These results are not compatible with the precoupled model of receptor and cyclase nor with floating receptor models in which an intermediate of hormone, receptor, and cyclase is in equilibrium with its reactants. The data strongly suggest that the collision coupling is the mode of coupling between the beta receptor and cyclase coupling in turkey erythrocyte membranes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1978        PMID: 212105     DOI: 10.1021/bi00611a020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  75 in total

1.  A unified model for signal transduction reactions in cellular membranes.

Authors:  Jason M Haugh
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Regulation of adenylate cyclase by adenosine.

Authors:  J N Fain; C C Malbon
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  1979-06-15       Impact factor: 3.396

3.  Third-party bioluminescence resonance energy transfer indicates constitutive association of membrane proteins: application to class a g-protein-coupled receptors and g-proteins.

Authors:  Sudhakiranmayi Kuravi; Tien-Hung Lan; Arnab Barik; Nevin A Lambert
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Distinct interactions between the human adrenergic beta(2) receptor and Galpha(s)--an in silico study.

Authors:  Andrea Strasser; Hans-Joachim Wittmann
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 1.810

5.  Computational modeling reveals how interplay between components of a GTPase-cycle module regulates signal transduction.

Authors:  Scott J Bornheimer; Mano R Maurya; Marilyn Gist Farquhar; Shankar Subramaniam
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Reactions on cell membranes: comparison of continuum theory and Brownian dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Michael I Monine; Jason M Haugh
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Dynamics of receptor/G protein coupling in living cells.

Authors:  Peter Hein; Monika Frank; Carsten Hoffmann; Martin J Lohse; Moritz Bünemann
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2005-11-17       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Heterotrimeric G proteins precouple with G protein-coupled receptors in living cells.

Authors:  Muriel Nobles; Amy Benians; Andrew Tinker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The G protein Gi1 exhibits basal coupling but not preassembly with G protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  Alexey Bondar; Josef Lazar
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Lateral motion of beta receptors in membranes of cultured liver cells.

Authors:  Y I Henis; M Hekman; E L Elson; E J Helmreich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.