Literature DB >> 21209275

Quantifying target conspicuity in contextual modulation by visual search.

Bilge Sayim1, Gerald Westheimer, Michael H Herzog.   

Abstract

Contextual elements can strongly modulate visual performance. For example, performance deteriorates when a vernier is flanked by neighboring lines. On a neural level, such contextual modulation is often explained by local spatial interactions such as lateral inhibition or pooling. However, these mechanisms cannot account for a number of recent results which showed that global rather than local factors play a key role in contextual modulation. On a level of perceptual organization, we proposed that contextual modulation increases when the target groups with the flankers and decreases when the target stands out from the flankers. To quantify this "standing out" in foveal vision, here, we performed both a visual search and a vernier offset discrimination task on the same stimulus configurations. Stimulus configurations yielding short reaction times in visual search yielded good vernier discrimination performance. Stimulus configurations yielding long reaction times yielded weaker discrimination. Hence, vernier offset discrimination is superior for targets that are efficiently searched and vice versa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21209275     DOI: 10.1167/11.1.6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  13 in total

1.  Crowding, grouping, and object recognition: A matter of appearance.

Authors:  Michael H Herzog; Bilge Sayim; Vitaly Chicherov; Mauro Manassi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Broad attention uncovers benefits of stimulus uniformity in visual crowding.

Authors:  Koen Rummens; Bilge Sayim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Multidimensional feature interactions in visual crowding: When  configural  cues  eliminate the polarity advantage.

Authors:  Koen Rummens; Bilge Sayim
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 2.004

4.  Visual crowding cannot be wholly explained by feature pooling.

Authors:  Edward F Ester; Daniel Klee; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Electrophysiological evidence for failures of item individuation in crowded visual displays.

Authors:  David E Anderson; Edward F Ester; Daniel Klee; Edward K Vogel; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  On the rules of integration of crowded orientation signals.

Authors:  Endel Põder
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2012-07-09

7.  Diagnosing the Periphery: Using the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Drawing Test to Characterize Peripheral Visual Function.

Authors:  Daniel R Coates; Johan Wagemans; Bilge Sayim
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-05-29

8.  Grouping and crowding affect target appearance over different spatial scales.

Authors:  Bilge Sayim; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Emergent features break the rules of crowding.

Authors:  Natalia Melnik; Daniel R Coates; Bilge Sayim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Redundancy masking: The loss of repeated items in crowded peripheral vision.

Authors:  Fazilet Zeynep Yildirim; Daniel R Coates; Bilge Sayim
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.