Literature DB >> 21208828

Repair of articular cartilage defects with tissue-engineered osteochondral composites in pigs.

Weiding Cui1, Qing Wang, Gang Chen, Shixiang Zhou, Qing Chang, Qiang Zuo, Kewei Ren, Weimin Fan.   

Abstract

To compare the results of repair of knee cartilage defects with tissue-engineered osteochondral composites and tissue-engineered cartilage in pigs. Autologous chondrocytes and osteoblasts were seeded on scaffolds of polylactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) and tricalcium phosphate (TCP) to generate tissue-engineered cartilage and tissue-engineered bone, respectively. The tissue-engineered osteochondral composite was formed by a chondrocyte-PLGA construct sutured to an osteoblast-TCP construct with an absorbable suture. Cartilage defects were surgically created at the weightbearing surface of the bilateral femoral medial condyles of 12 mini-pigs. Thus, 24 defects in 12 pigs were randomly assigned to three treatment groups: tissue-engineered osteochondral composite group, tissue-engineered cartilage group, and blank control group. Six months after surgery, the regenerated cartilage was scored macroscopically and histologically. The compressive properties and glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content of the cartilage were also assessed. The gross grading scale indicated that the mean scores of the tissue-engineered osteochondral composite group were significantly higher than those of the tissue-engineered cartilage group. According to the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) Visual Histological Assessment Scale, the scores of the osteochondral composite group were significantly better than those of the tissue-engineered cartilage group and blank control group. Assessment of compressive properties and GAG content showed better repair results in the osteochondral composite group than those of the tissue-engineered cartilage group. Using tissue-engineered osteochondral composites to repair cartilage defects was better than that of tissue-engineered cartilage.
Copyright © 2010 The Society for Biotechnology, Japan. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21208828     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2010.11.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biosci Bioeng        ISSN: 1347-4421            Impact factor:   2.894


  13 in total

1.  Reinforcement of Mono- and Bi-layer Poly(Ethylene Glycol) Hydrogels with a Fibrous Collagen Scaffold.

Authors:  K R C Kinneberg; A Nelson; M E Stender; A H Aziz; L C Mozdzen; B A C Harley; S J Bryant; V L Ferguson
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  A biphasic scaffold based on silk and bioactive ceramic with stratified properties for osteochondral tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Jiao Jiao Li; Kyungsook Kim; Seyed-Iman Roohani-Esfahani; Jin Guo; David L Kaplan; Hala Zreiqat
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 6.331

Review 3.  Poly (lactic acid)-based biomaterials for orthopaedic regenerative engineering.

Authors:  Ganesh Narayanan; Varadraj N Vernekar; Emmanuel L Kuyinu; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 15.470

4.  Sustained release poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres of bone morphogenetic protein 2 plasmid/calcium phosphate to promote in vitro bone formation and in vivo ectopic osteogenesis.

Authors:  Chunyan Qiao; Kai Zhang; Bin Sun; Jinzhong Liu; Jiyu Song; Yue Hu; Shihui Yang; Hongchen Sun; Bai Yang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 5.  Physiology and Engineering of the Graded Interfaces of Musculoskeletal Junctions.

Authors:  Edward D Bonnevie; Robert L Mauck
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 9.590

6.  Supporting Biomaterials for Articular Cartilage Repair.

Authors:  Daniela Filipa Duarte Campos; Wolf Drescher; Björn Rath; Markus Tingart; Horst Fischer
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Formation of Osteochondral Organoids from Murine Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Authors:  Shannon K O'Connor; Dakota B Katz; Sara J Oswald; Logan Groneck; Farshid Guilak
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 4.080

8.  Bi-layered Composite Scaffold for Repair of the Osteochondral Defects.

Authors:  Dongdong Xu; Gu Cheng; Jinhong Dai; Zhi Li
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 4.947

9.  Biomimetic biphasic scaffolds for osteochondral defect repair.

Authors:  Xuezhou Li; Jianxun Ding; Jincheng Wang; Xiuli Zhuang; Xuesi Chen
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2015-08-24

10.  Spatial Engineering of Osteochondral Tissue Constructs Through Microfluidically Directed Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Authors:  Stephen M Goldman; Gilda A Barabino
Journal:  Biores Open Access       Date:  2016-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.