Literature DB >> 21207967

Comparison of inlet geometry in microfluidic cell affinity chromatography.

Peng Li1, Yu Tian, Dimitri Pappas.   

Abstract

Cell separation based on microfluidic affinity chromatography is a widely used methodology in cell analysis research when rapid separations with high purity are needed. Several successful examples have been reported with high separation efficiency and purity; however, cell capture at the inlet area and inlet design have not been extensively described or studied. The most common inlets-used to connect the microfluidic chip to pumps, tubing, etc.-are vertical (top-loading) inlets and parallel (in-line) inlets. In this work, we investigated the cell capture behavior near the affinity chip inlet area and compared the different performances of vertical inlet devices and parallel inlet devices. Vertical inlet devices showed significant cell capture capability near the inlet area, which led to the formation of cell blockages as the separation progressed. Cell density near the inlet area was much higher than that in the remaining channel, whereas for parallel inlet chips cell density at the inlet area was similar to that in the rest of the channel. In this paper, we discuss the effects of inlet type on chip fabrication, nonspecific binding, cell capture efficiency, and separation purity. We also discuss the possibility of using vertical inlets in negative-selection separations. Our findings show that inlet design is critical and must be considered when fabricating cell affinity microfluidic devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21207967      PMCID: PMC3059352          DOI: 10.1021/ac102975g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  33 in total

Review 1.  Macro-to-micro interfaces for microfluidic devices.

Authors:  Carl K Fredrickson; Z Hugh Fan
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2004-11-10       Impact factor: 6.799

2.  World-to-chip microfluidic interface with built-in valves for multichamber chip-based PCR assays.

Authors:  Kwang W Oh; Chinsung Park; Kak Namkoong; Jintae Kim; Kyeong-Sik Ock; Suhyeon Kim; Young-A Kim; Yoon-Kyoung Cho; Christopher Ko
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 6.799

3.  Quantitative measurements of the strength of adhesion of human neutrophils to a substratum in a microfluidic device.

Authors:  Edgar Gutierrez; Alex Groisman
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2007-02-17       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 4.  Cellular separations: a review of new challenges in analytical chemistry.

Authors:  Dimitri Pappas; Kelong Wang
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2007-08-25       Impact factor: 6.558

5.  Comparison of two immunomagnetic separation technologies to deplete T cells from human blood samples.

Authors:  Oscar Lara; Xiaodong Tong; Maciej Zborowski; Sherif S Farag; Jeffrey J Chalmers
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Rapid Prototyping of Microfluidic Systems in Poly(dimethylsiloxane).

Authors:  D C Duffy; J C McDonald; O J Schueller; G M Whitesides
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Human mammalian cell sorting using a highly integrated micro-fabricated fluorescence-activated cell sorter (microFACS).

Authors:  Sung Hwan Cho; Chun H Chen; Frank S Tsai; Jessica M Godin; Yu-Hwa Lo
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 6.799

8.  A microfluidic device for practical label-free CD4(+) T cell counting of HIV-infected subjects.

Authors:  Xuanhong Cheng; Daniel Irimia; Meredith Dixon; Kazuhiko Sekine; Utkan Demirci; Lee Zamir; Ronald G Tompkins; William Rodriguez; Mehmet Toner
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2006-11-24       Impact factor: 6.799

9.  Development of an epoxy-based monolith used for the affinity capturing of Escherichia coli bacteria.

Authors:  Caroline Peskoller; Reinhard Niessner; Michael Seidel
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 4.759

10.  An equilibrium method for continuous-flow cell sorting using dielectrophoresis.

Authors:  M D Vahey; J Voldman
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 6.986

View more
  7 in total

1.  Negative enrichment of target cells by microfluidic affinity chromatography.

Authors:  Peng Li; Yan Gao; Dimitri Pappas
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 2.  Rare cell isolation and analysis in microfluidics.

Authors:  Yuchao Chen; Peng Li; Po-Hsun Huang; Yuliang Xie; John D Mai; Lin Wang; Nam-Trung Nguyen; Tony Jun Huang
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 6.799

3.  Optofluidic fluorescent imaging cytometry on a cell phone.

Authors:  Hongying Zhu; Sam Mavandadi; Ahmet F Coskun; Oguzhan Yaglidere; Aydogan Ozcan
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Recent Advances in Supramolecular Affinity Separations: Affinity Chromatography and Related Methods.

Authors:  Ashley G Woolfork; Sazia Iftekhar; Susan Ovbude; Kyungah Suh; Sadia Sharmeen; Isaac Kyei; Jacob Jones; David S Hage
Journal:  Adv Chromatogr       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 0.400

Review 5.  Recent advances in microfluidic cell separations.

Authors:  Yan Gao; Wenjie Li; Dimitri Pappas
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 4.616

6.  Multiparameter cell affinity chromatography: separation and analysis in a single microfluidic channel.

Authors:  Peng Li; Yan Gao; Dimitri Pappas
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Comparison of Chip Inlet Geometry in Microfluidic Devices for Cell Studies.

Authors:  Yung-Shin Sun
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 4.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.