Literature DB >> 21207424

Molecular markers of endometrial carcinoma detected in uterine aspirates.

Eva Colas1, Cristina Perez, Silvia Cabrera, Nuria Pedrola, Marta Monge, Josep Castellvi, Fernando Eyzaguirre, Jesus Gregorio, Anna Ruiz, Marta Llaurado, Marina Rigau, Marta Garcia, Tugçe Ertekin, Melania Montes, Rafael Lopez-Lopez, Ramon Carreras, Jordi Xercavins, Alicia Ortega, Tamara Maes, Elisabet Rosell, Andreas Doll, Miguel Abal, Jaume Reventos, Antonio Gil-Moreno.   

Abstract

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most frequent of the invasive tumors of the female genital tract. Although usually detected in its initial stages, a 20% of the patients present with advanced disease. To date, no characterized molecular marker has been validated for the diagnosis of EC. In addition, new methods for prognosis and classification of EC are needed to combat this deadly disease. We thus aimed to identify new molecular markers of EC and to evaluate their validity on endometrial aspirates. Gene expression screening on 52 carcinoma samples and series of real-time quantitative PCR validation on 19 paired carcinomas and normal tissue samples and on 50 carcinoma and noncarcinoma uterine aspirates were performed to identify and validate potential biomarkers of EC. Candidate markers were further confirmed at the protein level by immunohistochemistry and Western blot. We identified ACAA1, AP1M2, CGN, DDR1, EPS8L2, FASTKD1, GMIP, IKBKE, P2RX4, P4HB, PHKG2, PPFIBP2, PPP1R16A, RASSF7, RNF183, SIRT6, TJP3, EFEMP2, SOCS2 and DCN as differentially expressed in ECs. Furthermore, the differential expression of these biomarkers in primary endometrial tumors is correlated to their expression level in corresponding uterine fluid samples. Finally, these biomarkers significantly identified EC with area under the receiver-operating-characteristic values ranging from 0.74 to 0.95 in uterine aspirates. Interestingly, analogous values were found among initial stages. We present the discovery of molecular biomarkers of EC and describe their utility in uterine aspirates. These findings represent the basis for the development of a highly sensitive and specific minimally invasive method for screening ECs.
Copyright © 2011 UICC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21207424     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.25901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  48 in total

Review 1.  Discoidin domain receptor tyrosine kinases: new players in cancer progression.

Authors:  Rajeshwari R Valiathan; Marta Marco; Birgit Leitinger; Celina G Kleer; Rafael Fridman
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 9.264

2.  Kinome expression profiling identifies IKBKE as a predictor of overall survival in clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Michelle A T Hildebrandt; Weiqi Tan; Pheroze Tamboli; Maosheng Huang; Yuanqing Ye; Jie Lin; Ju-Seog Lee; Christopher G Wood; Xifeng Wu
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 4.944

3.  Genetic analysis of uterine aspirates improves the diagnostic value and captures the intra-tumor heterogeneity of endometrial cancers.

Authors:  Alba Mota; Eva Colás; Pablo García-Sanz; Irene Campoy; Alejandro Rojo-Sebastián; Sonia Gatius; Ángel García; Luis Chiva; Sonsoles Alonso; Antonio Gil-Moreno; Xavier González-Tallada; Berta Díaz-Feijoo; August Vidal; Patrycja Ziober-Malinowska; Marcin Bobiński; Rafael López-López; Miguel Abal; Jaume Reventós; Xavier Matias-Guiu; Gema Moreno-Bueno
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 7.842

4.  Molecular determinants for lymph node metastasis in clinically early-stage endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Nadim Bou Zgheib; Douglas C Marchion; Stephen H Bush; Patricia L Judson; Robert M Wenham; Sachin M Apte; Johnathan M Lancaster; Jesus Gonzalez-Bosquet
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 5.  Complex roles of discoidin domain receptor tyrosine kinases in cancer.

Authors:  V Mehta; H Chander; A Munshi
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  Biomarkers in endometrial cancer: Possible clinical applications (Review).

Authors:  Kouji Banno; Iori Kisu; Megumi Yanokura; Kosuke Tsuji; Kenta Masuda; Arisa Ueki; Yusuke Kobayashi; Wataru Yamagami; Hiroyuki Nomura; Eiichiro Tominaga; Nobuyuki Susumu; Daisuke Aoki
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  The novel cyclophilin-D-interacting protein FASTKD1 protects cells against oxidative stress-induced cell death.

Authors:  Kurt D Marshall; Paula J Klutho; Lihui Song; Maike Krenz; Christopher P Baines
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 4.249

8.  Quantitative proteomic analysis in metastatic renal cell carcinoma reveals a unique set of proteins with potential prognostic significance.

Authors:  Olena Masui; Nicole M A White; Leroi V DeSouza; Olga Krakovska; Ajay Matta; Shereen Metias; Bishoy Khalil; Alexander D Romaschin; R John Honey; Robert Stewart; Kenneth Pace; Georg A Bjarnason; K W Michael Siu; George M Yousef
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 5.911

9.  Kinome Profiling of Primary Endometrial Tumors Using Multiplexed Inhibitor Beads and Mass Spectrometry Identifies SRPK1 as Candidate Therapeutic Target.

Authors:  Alison M Kurimchak; Vikas Kumar; Carlos Herrera-Montávez; Katherine J Johnson; Nishi Srivastava; Karthik Davarajan; Suraj Peri; Kathy Q Cai; Gina M Mantia-Smaldone; James S Duncan
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 5.911

10.  Rare coding variants and breast cancer risk: evaluation of susceptibility Loci identified in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Yanfeng Zhang; Jirong Long; Wei Lu; Xiao-Ou Shu; Qiuyin Cai; Ying Zheng; Chun Li; Bingshan Li; Yu-Tang Gao; Wei Zheng
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.