Literature DB >> 21206365

Clinical evaluation of signal-to-noise ratio-based noise reduction in Nucleus® cochlear implant recipients.

Pam W Dawson1, Stefan J Mauger, Adam A Hersbach.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether a real-time noise reduction algorithm provided speech perception benefit for Cochlear™ Nucleus® cochlear implant recipients in the laboratory.
DESIGN: The noise reduction algorithm attenuated masker-dominated channels. It estimated the signal-to-noise ratio of each channel on a short-term basis from a single microphone input, using a recursive minimum statistics method. In this clinical evaluation, the algorithm was implemented in two programs (noise reduction programs 1 [NR1] and 2 [NR2]), which differed in their level of noise reduction. These programs used advanced combination encoder (ACE™) channel selection and were compared with ACE without noise reduction in 13 experienced cochlear implant subjects. An adaptive speech reception threshold (SRT) test provided the signal-to-noise ratio for 50% sentence intelligibility in three different types of noises: speech-weighted, cocktail party, and street-side city noise.
RESULTS: In all three noise types, mean SRTs for both NR programs were significantly better than those for ACE. The greatest improvement occurred for speech-weighted noise; the SRT benefit over ACE was 1.77 dB for NR1 and 2.14 dB for NR2. There were no significant differences in speech perception scores between the two NR programs. Subjects reported no degradation in sound quality with the experimental programs.
CONCLUSIONS: The noise reduction algorithm was successful in improving sentence perception in speech-weighted noise, as well as in more dynamic types of background noise. The algorithm is currently being trialed in a behind-the-ear processor for take-home use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21206365     DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318201c200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  24 in total

1.  Comparison of two channel selection criteria for noise suppression in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Oldooz Hazrati; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Two-microphone spatial filtering provides speech reception benefits for cochlear implant users in difficult acoustic environments.

Authors:  Raymond L Goldsworthy; Lorraine A Delhorne; Joseph G Desloge; Louis D Braida
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Speech enhancement for cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Dongmei Wang; John H L Hansen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Combined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation With Hearing Preservation: Effect of Cochlear Implant Low-Frequency Cutoff on Speech Understanding and Perceived Listening Difficulty.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Timothy J Davis; Linsey W Sunderhaus; Christine Menapace; Barbara Buck; Jillian Crosson; Lori O'Neill; Anne Beiter; Phil Segel
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  SEDA: A tunable Q-factor wavelet-based noise reduction algorithm for multi-talker babble.

Authors:  Roozbeh Soleymani; Ivan W Selesnick; David M Landsberger
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.017

6.  The effect of a coding strategy that removes temporally masked pulses on speech perception by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Wiebke Lamping; Tobias Goehring; Jeremy Marozeau; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Effects of Adaptation Rate and Noise Suppression on the Intelligibility of Compressed-Envelope Based Speech.

Authors:  Ying-Hui Lai; Yu Tsao; Fei Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Using recurrent neural networks to improve the perception of speech in non-stationary noise by people with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Tobias Goehring; Mahmoud Keshavarzi; Robert P Carlyon; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Speech perception and localisation with SCORE bimodal: a loudness normalisation strategy for combined cochlear implant and hearing aid stimulation.

Authors:  Tom Francart; Hugh McDermott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The next generation of Nucleus(®) fitting: a multiplatform approach towards universal cochlear implant management.

Authors:  Andrew Botros; Rami Banna; Saji Maruthurkkara
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 2.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.