CONTEXT: Chromosomal abnormalities (namely 13q, 17p, and 11q deletions) have prognostic implications and are recurrent in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), suggesting that they are involved in a common pathogenetic pathway; however, the molecular mechanism through which chromosomal abnormalities affect the pathogenesis and outcome of CLL is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the microRNA miR-15a/miR-16-1 cluster (located at 13q), tumor protein p53 (TP53, located at 17p), and miR-34b/miR-34c cluster (located at 11q) are linked in a molecular pathway that explains the pathogenetic and prognostic implications (indolent vs aggressive form) of recurrent 13q, 17p, and 11q deletions in CLL. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: CLL Research Consortium institutions provided blood samples from untreated patients (n = 206) diagnosed with B-cell CLL between January 2000 and April 2008. All samples were evaluated for the occurrence of cytogenetic abnormalities as well as the expression levels of the miR-15a/miR-16-1 cluster, miR-34b/miR-34c cluster, TP53, and zeta-chain (TCR)-associated protein kinase 70 kDa (ZAP70), a surrogate prognostic marker of CLL. The functional relationship between these genes was studied using in vitro gain- and loss-of-function experiments in cell lines and primary samples and was validated in a separate cohort of primary CLL samples. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cytogenetic abnormalities; expression levels of the miR-15a/miR-16-1 cluster, miR-34 family, TP53 gene, downstream effectors cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A (p21, Cip1) (CDKN1A) and B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2 binding component 3 (BBC3), and ZAP70 gene; genetic interactions detected by chromatin immunoprecipitation. RESULTS: In CLLs with 13q deletions the miR-15a/miR-16-1 cluster directly targeted TP53 (mean luciferase activity for miR-15a vs scrambled control, 0.68 relative light units (RLU) [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.63-0.73]; P = .02; mean for miR-16 vs scrambled control, 0.62 RLU [95% CI, 0.59-0.65]; P = .02) and its downstream effectors. In leukemic cell lines and primary CLL cells, TP53 stimulated the transcription of miR-15/miR-16-1 as well as miR-34b/miR-34c clusters, and the miR-34b/miR-34c cluster directly targeted the ZAP70 kinase (mean luciferase activity for miR-34a vs scrambled control, 0.33 RLU [95% CI, 0.30-0.36]; P = .02; mean for miR-34b vs scrambled control, 0.31 RLU [95% CI, 0.30-0.32]; P = .01; and mean for miR-34c vs scrambled control, 0.35 RLU [95% CI, 0.33-0.37]; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: A microRNA/TP53 feedback circuitry is associated with CLL pathogenesis and outcome. This mechanism provides a novel pathogenetic model for the association of 13q deletions with the indolent form of CLL that involves microRNAs, TP53, and ZAP70.
CONTEXT: Chromosomal abnormalities (namely 13q, 17p, and 11q deletions) have prognostic implications and are recurrent in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), suggesting that they are involved in a common pathogenetic pathway; however, the molecular mechanism through which chromosomal abnormalities affect the pathogenesis and outcome of CLL is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the microRNA miR-15a/miR-16-1 cluster (located at 13q), tumor protein p53 (TP53, located at 17p), and miR-34b/miR-34c cluster (located at 11q) are linked in a molecular pathway that explains the pathogenetic and prognostic implications (indolent vs aggressive form) of recurrent 13q, 17p, and 11q deletions in CLL. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: CLL Research Consortium institutions provided blood samples from untreated patients (n = 206) diagnosed with B-cell CLL between January 2000 and April 2008. All samples were evaluated for the occurrence of cytogenetic abnormalities as well as the expression levels of the miR-15a/miR-16-1 cluster, miR-34b/miR-34c cluster, TP53, and zeta-chain (TCR)-associated protein kinase 70 kDa (ZAP70), a surrogate prognostic marker of CLL. The functional relationship between these genes was studied using in vitro gain- and loss-of-function experiments in cell lines and primary samples and was validated in a separate cohort of primary CLL samples. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cytogenetic abnormalities; expression levels of the miR-15a/miR-16-1 cluster, miR-34 family, TP53 gene, downstream effectors cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A (p21, Cip1) (CDKN1A) and B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2 binding component 3 (BBC3), and ZAP70 gene; genetic interactions detected by chromatin immunoprecipitation. RESULTS: In CLLs with 13q deletions the miR-15a/miR-16-1 cluster directly targeted TP53 (mean luciferase activity for miR-15a vs scrambled control, 0.68 relative light units (RLU) [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.63-0.73]; P = .02; mean for miR-16 vs scrambled control, 0.62 RLU [95% CI, 0.59-0.65]; P = .02) and its downstream effectors. In leukemic cell lines and primary CLL cells, TP53 stimulated the transcription of miR-15/miR-16-1 as well as miR-34b/miR-34c clusters, and the miR-34b/miR-34c cluster directly targeted the ZAP70 kinase (mean luciferase activity for miR-34a vs scrambled control, 0.33 RLU [95% CI, 0.30-0.36]; P = .02; mean for miR-34b vs scrambled control, 0.31 RLU [95% CI, 0.30-0.32]; P = .01; and mean for miR-34c vs scrambled control, 0.35 RLU [95% CI, 0.33-0.37]; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: A microRNA/TP53 feedback circuitry is associated with CLL pathogenesis and outcome. This mechanism provides a novel pathogenetic model for the association of 13q deletions with the indolent form of CLL that involves microRNAs, TP53, and ZAP70.
Authors: Laura Z Rassenti; Lang Huynh; Tracy L Toy; Liguang Chen; Michael J Keating; John G Gribben; Donna S Neuberg; Ian W Flinn; Kanti R Rai; John C Byrd; Neil E Kay; Andrew Greaves; Arthur Weiss; Thomas J Kipps Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-08-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J L Binet; M Leporrier; G Dighiero; D Charron; P D'Athis; G Vaugier; H M Beral; J C Natali; M Raphael; B Nizet; J Y Follezou Journal: Cancer Date: 1977-08 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: George Adrian Calin; Calin Dan Dumitru; Masayoshi Shimizu; Roberta Bichi; Simona Zupo; Evan Noch; Hansjuerg Aldler; Sashi Rattan; Michael Keating; Kanti Rai; Laura Rassenti; Thomas Kipps; Massimo Negrini; Florencia Bullrich; Carlo M Croce Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2002-11-14 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: H Döhner; S Stilgenbauer; A Benner; E Leupolt; A Kröber; L Bullinger; K Döhner; M Bentz; P Lichter Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-12-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Gordon W Dewald; Stephanie R Brockman; Sarah F Paternoster; Nancy D Bone; Judith R O'Fallon; Cristine Allmer; Charles D James; Diane F Jelinek; Renee C Tschumper; Curtis A Hanson; Rajiv K Pruthi; Thomas E Witzig; Timothy G Call; Neil E Kay Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: Zijun Y Xu-Monette; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Yong Li; Robert Z Orlowski; Michael Andreeff; Carlos E Bueso-Ramos; Timothy C Greiner; Timothy J McDonnell; Ken H Young Journal: Blood Date: 2012-01-24 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Alessandra Ferrajoli; Tait D Shanafelt; Cristina Ivan; Masayoshi Shimizu; Kari G Rabe; Nazila Nouraee; Mariko Ikuo; Asish K Ghosh; Susan Lerner; Laura Z Rassenti; Lianchun Xiao; Jianhua Hu; James M Reuben; Steliana Calin; M James You; John T Manning; William G Wierda; Zeev Estrov; Susan O'Brien; Thomas J Kipps; Michael J Keating; Neil E Kay; George A Calin Journal: Blood Date: 2013-07-02 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Guido Marcucci; Clara D Bloomfield; Heiko Becker; Kati Maharry; Krzysztof Mrózek; Stefano Volinia; Ann-Kathrin Eisfeld; Michael D Radmacher; Jessica Kohlschmidt; Klaus H Metzeler; Sebastian Schwind; Susan P Whitman; Jason H Mendler; Yue-Zhong Wu; Deedra Nicolet; Peter Paschka; Bayard L Powell; Thomas H Carter; Meir Wetzler; Jonathan E Kolitz; Andrew J Carroll; Maria R Baer; Michael A Caligiuri; Richard M Stone Journal: Leukemia Date: 2014-03-21 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Michael R Burgio; John P A Ioannidis; Brett M Kaminski; Eric Derycke; Scott Rogers; Muin J Khoury; Daniela Seminara Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2013-09-17 Impact factor: 4.254